Why was myles in? Two things if he gets fouled he is not making both foul shots and why in the hell was on the other side of the court it allowed Garza to guard no one; Also Jacob had more time to go around Garza and why didn't we just pass it in to Jacob they weren't even guarding the inbounds that wasted more time
Final Play
- Thread starter richthedentist
- Start date
because the board that vents together, stays together
You can nitpick and not be wrong and say that we messed up the last 3.7 seconds.
our best opportunity to get the best look would have been a play designed off of a FT miss. I would have thought we would have had a set play for situation. A timeout definitely not optimal.
our best opportunity to get the best look would have been a play designed off of a FT miss. I would have thought we would have had a set play for situation. A timeout definitely not optimal.
I thought that was a well designed play
The only thing better I would have liked is young to pull it up clean ...even from 35 feet. Taking that shot on run is almost impossible
The only thing better I would have liked is young to pull it up clean ...even from 35 feet. Taking that shot on run is almost impossible
He was in to set the screen. I like the play but it’s probably better if there was like 5 seconds on the clock . Jacob even with his speed could only get slightly to mid court . Ideally I thought Myles would inbound the ball to see over the defender and throw it to half court . However with 3 seconds we probably needed to lob it up to Myles at half court and have someone streaking by he could pass to
I think PIke was hoping that we would be inbounding from the sideline after the TO. Announcers mentioned it too. That probably had a huge impact on what was drawn up.
I was expecting someone to come out of bounds to get the ball from Jacob and then pass it back to him to keep an extra second on the clock and allow for Jacob to get a full head of steam. Downside is getting the ball in would have been more difficult I guess