Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rootmaster" data-source="post: 129518951" data-attributes="member: 1428050">Buck...check your eyes this morning LOL.&nbsp; I am saying&nbsp; that it is entirely possible that the Presidents will kick the can down the road and let the next group deal with the expansion issue.&nbsp; If you haven't noticed that is the political norm today.As far as the Big 12-2=10 is concerned....I use that to point out the fact that Big 12 is not...well 12, but 10 and that is a perceived weakness with a lot of folks.&nbsp; At least the rest of the conferences that have expanded and got with the program have incorrect names but are bigger than their name says they are LOLx2.&nbsp; Sorry you don't like me saying it, but the Big12 is neither big in regards to market numbers or to the actual number of teams within it.&nbsp; They are what they can't be called...the Big 10.&nbsp; So, I will stick with Big 12-2=10 and you can either read it or not.&nbsp; Your choice.&nbsp; Bye.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rootmaster, post: 129518951, member: 1428050"] Buck...check your eyes this morning LOL. I am saying that it is entirely possible that the Presidents will kick the can down the road and let the next group deal with the expansion issue. If you haven't noticed that is the political norm today. As far as the Big 12-2=10 is concerned....I use that to point out the fact that Big 12 is not...well 12, but 10 and that is a perceived weakness with a lot of folks. At least the rest of the conferences that have expanded and got with the program have incorrect names but are bigger than their name says they are LOLx2. Sorry you don't like me saying it, but the Big12 is neither big in regards to market numbers or to the actual number of teams within it. They are what they can't be called...the Big 10. So, I will stick with Big 12-2=10 and you can either read it or not. Your choice. Bye. [/QUOTE]

Name