Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129506123" data-attributes="member: 1459051">Personal insults just show your argument can't stand on its own merit.You keep missing my point. Your formula doesn't take into account expenses. Therefore, the amount of money the Big 12 schools actually get is going to be less than what you calculated, because your calculations are BEFORE expenses. Let me respond to your statement in bold:THE NUMBERS THAT WENT INTO CREATING $7.6 IN ACTUAL REVENUES ARE NOT THE SAME AS MY FORMULA!!!!!!!!!That's exactly the point. The actual numbers end up being less than the formula. So that proves my point. The amount the Big 12 schools get is going to be less than what you figured, because the actual numbers are going to be smaller than the numbers you used. That's because the Big 12 is going to have to pay expenses before it distributes the remaining money to the schools. Therefore, the actual amount of money the schools get from the Big 12 network is going to be less than the $8-10 million you calculated, because the network will take out expenses before they pay the schools.Regarding the Big Ten numbers, the relevance there is that the Big Ten numbers are the amount left over after the network pays expenses. The same thing will happen with the Big 12.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129506123, member: 1459051"] Personal insults just show your argument can't stand on its own merit. You keep missing my point. Your formula doesn't take into account expenses. Therefore, the amount of money the Big 12 schools actually get is going to be less than what you calculated, because your calculations are BEFORE expenses. Let me respond to your statement in bold: [I]THE NUMBERS THAT WENT INTO CREATING $7.6 IN ACTUAL REVENUES ARE NOT THE SAME AS MY FORMULA!!!!!!!!![/I] That's exactly the point. The actual numbers end up being less than the formula. So that proves my point. The amount the Big 12 schools get is going to be less than what you figured, because the actual numbers are going to be smaller than the numbers you used. That's because the Big 12 is going to have to pay expenses before it distributes the remaining money to the schools. Therefore, the actual amount of money the schools get from the Big 12 network is going to be less than the $8-10 million you calculated, because the network will take out expenses before they pay the schools. Regarding the Big Ten numbers, the relevance there is that the Big Ten numbers are the amount left over after the network pays expenses. The same thing will happen with the Big 12. [/QUOTE]

Name