Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
CBB Transfer Portal
Team Recruiting Rankings
2027 Rivals300
MegaBoard
Message Boards
Inside Kalani Sitake's decision to turn down Penn State, stay at BYU: 'It got real'
Heisman favorites, draft locks and one alien: The 10 best returning players in 2026
Auburn spring intel: Byrum Brown's leadership, Jeremiah Cobb buzz, transfer standouts
The scheme behind Matt Campbell's tight end obsession at Penn State
The NFL can wait: Why Marcus Freeman's build of Notre Dame still has new heights to reach
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129504761" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>Deflection on your part. You said:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Boren actually said:</p><p></p><p><em>He (Boren) said Big 12 schools are losing $4 million to $6 million per year because of the lack of a conference network.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p>He didn't make any specification about Tier 3 rights, like you claimed. His point is clear. The conference is losing $4-6 million a year because they don't have a network. Well, if they are losing $4-6 million, then the payout can't be $8 million, because then they would be losing MORE than $4-6 million.</p><p></p><p>The problem is not with your arithmetic. The problem is with your formula. You are assuming all the revenue goes to the schools. It doesn't. The Big 12 will not get $8 million from a network after expenses are factored in. That's illustrated by the payouts from both the Big Ten and SEC. And yes, it is perfectly reasonable to compare those two conferences. Your formula does not accurately predict what the Big Ten and SEC make BECAUSE YOU DON'T FACTOR IN FOR EXPENSES. The payouts in the Big Ten are known. The payouts in the SEC are known. They don't pay out as much as your formula predicts. Therefore, your formula is wrong. It's pretty simple.</p><p></p><p>Oh by the way. Show me some evidence the Big Ten only got $.10 per subscriber in Philadelphia. I'm still waiting for that one.</p><p></p><p>Oh another point. You are criticizing me for not knowing the distribution model for the Big Ten (which isn't true). Well, you have absolutely no idea what distribution mode the Big 12 will have. You don't even know what kind of network model the Big 12 will have. Even Boren's plan includes extra compensation to Texas, which would further skew the numbers for the rest of the league.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129504761, member: 1459051"] Deflection on your part. You said: Boren actually said: [I]He (Boren) said Big 12 schools are losing $4 million to $6 million per year because of the lack of a conference network. [/I] He didn't make any specification about Tier 3 rights, like you claimed. His point is clear. The conference is losing $4-6 million a year because they don't have a network. Well, if they are losing $4-6 million, then the payout can't be $8 million, because then they would be losing MORE than $4-6 million. The problem is not with your arithmetic. The problem is with your formula. You are assuming all the revenue goes to the schools. It doesn't. The Big 12 will not get $8 million from a network after expenses are factored in. That's illustrated by the payouts from both the Big Ten and SEC. And yes, it is perfectly reasonable to compare those two conferences. Your formula does not accurately predict what the Big Ten and SEC make BECAUSE YOU DON'T FACTOR IN FOR EXPENSES. The payouts in the Big Ten are known. The payouts in the SEC are known. They don't pay out as much as your formula predicts. Therefore, your formula is wrong. It's pretty simple. Oh by the way. Show me some evidence the Big Ten only got $.10 per subscriber in Philadelphia. I'm still waiting for that one. Oh another point. You are criticizing me for not knowing the distribution model for the Big Ten (which isn't true). Well, you have absolutely no idea what distribution mode the Big 12 will have. You don't even know what kind of network model the Big 12 will have. Even Boren's plan includes extra compensation to Texas, which would further skew the numbers for the rest of the league. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom