Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Baseball Transfer Portal
Rivals300
Team Recruiting Rankings
Prediction Machine
CFB Player Rankings
Todd Golden opens up on Thomas Haugh’s return, Florida’s expectations and more
College quarterback standouts from the 2026 Manning Passing Academy
After breakout freshman season, Mason Heintschel has Pitt dreaming bigger in Year 2
Most believe raising the revenue-share cap is a must, but agreement on a figure remains difficult
Marcel Reed has unfinished business at Texas A&M — and a CFP berth isn't enough
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129504205" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>Yes, you did clearly $2 million + subscription fees. Here's your exact comment:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See, all you did was take $2 million and add it to the $6 million. That's exactly what I said. You just added $2 million + subscription fees.</p><p></p><p>I do know what the Big Ten made and what it distributed. <a href="http://btn.com/2013/05/06/report-big-ten-payouts-to-hit-25-7-million/">http://btn.com/2013/05/06/report-big-ten-payouts-to-hit-25-7-million/</a></p><p>This is the Big Ten payout from 2013:</p><p></p><p><em>According to a report by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, each Big Ten school will receive $25.7 million this year from the conference. The Big Ten Network will contribute $7.6 million of that figure. Big Ten schools also received $10.9 million apiece from the conference’s television deal with ABC and ESPN.</em></p><p></p><p>The BTN paid out $7.6 million to each team. So we have concrete figures. Now, let's apply your formula and see what we get. In 2013, The BTN had 52 million subscribers, 20 million of which were in the footprint. <a href="http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/5/3/4295242/sec-network-big-ten-network-comparison">http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/5/3/4295242/sec-network-big-ten-network-comparison</a></p><p></p><p>The BTN gets $1.00 inside the footprint, and $.20 outside. Ok, so let's add up the numbers:</p><p>20 million * $1.00 = $20 million</p><p>32 million * $.20 = $6.4 million</p><p>$20 million + $6.4 million =$26.4 million</p><p>$26.4 million * 12 months = $316.8 million</p><p>$316.8 million / 2 (half for Fox) = $158.4 million</p><p>$158.4 million / 13 (in 2013, the Big Ten only had 12 teams, plus the conference HQ) = $12.2 million</p><p></p><p>So there you go. Using your formula, the Big Ten would get $12.2 million. However, they actually got $7.6 million. Pretty big difference. That shows you the expenses, etc. that come off the top before the money is actually distributed. Your figures predicted $8-9 million for the Big 12. Well, obviously, a fairly good chuck has to come out of that for expenses, as evidenced by the Big Ten. That means you are looking at closer to $4-5 million coming from the Big 12 network.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129504205, member: 1459051"] Yes, you did clearly $2 million + subscription fees. Here's your exact comment: See, all you did was take $2 million and add it to the $6 million. That's exactly what I said. You just added $2 million + subscription fees. I do know what the Big Ten made and what it distributed. [URL]http://btn.com/2013/05/06/report-big-ten-payouts-to-hit-25-7-million/[/URL] This is the Big Ten payout from 2013: [I]According to a report by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, each Big Ten school will receive $25.7 million this year from the conference. The Big Ten Network will contribute $7.6 million of that figure. Big Ten schools also received $10.9 million apiece from the conference’s television deal with ABC and ESPN.[/I] The BTN paid out $7.6 million to each team. So we have concrete figures. Now, let's apply your formula and see what we get. In 2013, The BTN had 52 million subscribers, 20 million of which were in the footprint. [URL]http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/5/3/4295242/sec-network-big-ten-network-comparison[/URL] The BTN gets $1.00 inside the footprint, and $.20 outside. Ok, so let's add up the numbers: 20 million * $1.00 = $20 million 32 million * $.20 = $6.4 million $20 million + $6.4 million =$26.4 million $26.4 million * 12 months = $316.8 million $316.8 million / 2 (half for Fox) = $158.4 million $158.4 million / 13 (in 2013, the Big Ten only had 12 teams, plus the conference HQ) = $12.2 million So there you go. Using your formula, the Big Ten would get $12.2 million. However, they actually got $7.6 million. Pretty big difference. That shows you the expenses, etc. that come off the top before the money is actually distributed. Your figures predicted $8-9 million for the Big 12. Well, obviously, a fairly good chuck has to come out of that for expenses, as evidenced by the Big Ten. That means you are looking at closer to $4-5 million coming from the Big 12 network. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom