Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129502785" data-attributes="member: 1459051">You are all over the place. Here is what Boren says:He (Boren) said Big 12 schools are losing $4 million to $6 million per year because of the lack of a conference network.Ok, well what the means is, the $4-6 million they are losing is the amount they would get paid from a conference network. So, no, I'm not saying Boren is lying. What I'm saying is, you don't understand Boren's comment.You have arbitrarily made up this $8-9 million figure. Boren's comments clearly indicate what the payouts would be for a Big 12 network: $4-6 million a year to each school. That makes sense, because that's inline with that the SEC and Big Ten already get.What I am saying is wrong is your back-of-the-napkin calculations you used to arrive at the $8-9 million figure.Also, I didn't imply anything about the Big 12's coverage being lesser somehow. You inferred that because you have you antenna up looking for anything anti-Big 12. You said that Texas would get more national coverage from a Big 12 network than the LHN. I said that wasn't true, because the Big 12 is not automatically nationally broadcasted. As I pointed out, a Big 12 network would have to be purchased as an add-on in some areas, which is no different than the situation with the LHN now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129502785, member: 1459051"] You are all over the place. Here is what Boren says: [I]He (Boren) said Big 12 schools are losing $4 million to $6 million per year because of the lack of a conference network. [/I] Ok, well what the means is, the $4-6 million they are losing is the amount they would get paid from a conference network. So, no, I'm not saying Boren is lying. What I'm saying is, you don't understand Boren's comment. You have arbitrarily made up this $8-9 million figure. Boren's comments clearly indicate what the payouts would be for a Big 12 network: $4-6 million a year to each school. That makes sense, because that's inline with that the SEC and Big Ten already get. What I am saying is wrong is your back-of-the-napkin calculations you used to arrive at the $8-9 million figure. Also, I didn't imply anything about the Big 12's coverage being lesser somehow. You inferred that because you have you antenna up looking for anything anti-Big 12. You said that Texas would get more national coverage from a Big 12 network than the LHN. I said that wasn't true, because the Big 12 is not automatically nationally broadcasted. As I pointed out, a Big 12 network would have to be purchased as an add-on in some areas, which is no different than the situation with the LHN now. [/QUOTE]

Name

Texas Tech emerges as early school to watch for Thomas Castellanos as Red Raiders work through compliance

From Lane Kiffin to James Franklin: 10 first-year head coaches built to win right away

Latest on Tennessee quarterback battle as Volunteers finish final scrimmage

Pat Kelsey reveals approach to recruiting in NIL, transfer portal era

Dan Lanning: NFL players returning to college football 'unfair to the sport'

Reply to thread

Latest