Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Hot
CBB Transfer Portal
MegaBoard
2027 Rivals300
Team Recruiting Rankings
Message Boards
Transfer Portal Intel: Indiana, Tennessee, & North Carolina gaining momentum with top prospects
Wake Forest transfer Juke Harris intel: Latest on Michigan, North Carolina & Tennessee pursuing
10 college football players with breakout potential in 2026
Not a lot of fluff with Alex Golesh, who's dead set on building back the Auburn brand on the Plains
Jeff Brohm explains why 'hungry' Lincoln Kienholz was right fit for Louisville
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129484385" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>The issue isn't that UT makes more than others. The issue is having a strong conference top to bottom so that everyone benefits in the arrangement. In other conferences, everyone shares in the media rights of the schools in the conference. In the BIG 12 some are doing fantastic, some are on par or a little better than schools in other leagues. Several though, are beginning to fall behind. This gap is going to continue to grow. Some of the schools now even or slightly better than the other P5s are going to slip some as new media rights deals push other leagues higher in revenues.</p><p></p><p>This doesn't help the BIG 12 to be a stable league or help all members to be as successful as possible.</p><p></p><p>Creating a conference network brings everyone up to the financial situation of other conferences and gives them the chance to be as successful as anyone. Texas' financial status is not affected. The question then becomes why would UT be opposed to the rest of their conference having success as well?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129484385, member: 1428007"] The issue isn't that UT makes more than others. The issue is having a strong conference top to bottom so that everyone benefits in the arrangement. In other conferences, everyone shares in the media rights of the schools in the conference. In the BIG 12 some are doing fantastic, some are on par or a little better than schools in other leagues. Several though, are beginning to fall behind. This gap is going to continue to grow. Some of the schools now even or slightly better than the other P5s are going to slip some as new media rights deals push other leagues higher in revenues. This doesn't help the BIG 12 to be a stable league or help all members to be as successful as possible. Creating a conference network brings everyone up to the financial situation of other conferences and gives them the chance to be as successful as anyone. Texas' financial status is not affected. The question then becomes why would UT be opposed to the rest of their conference having success as well? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Expansion
Top
Bottom