Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129478291" data-attributes="member: 1428007">From ESPN--and some of you should read the bold highlight here:excerpt:In essence, the proposal was almost exclusively a vote about the future of the Big 12 and whether the conference would be given the green light to implement a championship game at its own discretion.A “no” vote would’ve forced the Big 12 to expand by two schools in order to add a title game, pitting the two divisional winners against one another. But in light of the proposal’s adoption, any expansion talk will probably be put back on the back burner for the time being and the debate on whether the Big 12 should re-institute a conference championship game will be propelled to the forefront.<a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/108867/title-game-deregulation-leaves-big-12-to-decide-if-it-controls-path-to-cfp">http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/108867/title-game-deregulation-leaves-big-12-to-decide-if-it-controls-path-to-cfp</a>As I've stated, the deregulation doesn't END expansion, just pushes it back so that it isn't immediately necessary--which is just what the conference wanted.&nbsp; After they know what the Big Ten is getting, things may change again.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129478291, member: 1428007"] From ESPN--and some of you should read the bold highlight here: excerpt: In essence, the proposal was almost exclusively a vote about the future of the Big 12 and whether the conference would be given the green light to implement a championship game at its own discretion. A “no” vote would’ve forced the Big 12 to expand by two schools in order to add a title game, pitting the two divisional winners against one another. [B]But in light of the proposal’s adoption, any expansion talk will probably be put back on the back burner for the time being [/B]and the debate on whether the Big 12 should re-institute a conference championship game will be propelled to the forefront. [URL]http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/108867/title-game-deregulation-leaves-big-12-to-decide-if-it-controls-path-to-cfp[/URL] As I've stated, the deregulation doesn't END expansion, just pushes it back so that it isn't immediately necessary--which is just what the conference wanted. After they know what the Big Ten is getting, things may change again. [/QUOTE]

Name

Texas Tech emerges as early school to watch for Thomas Castellanos as Red Raiders work through compliance

From Lane Kiffin to James Franklin: 10 first-year head coaches built to win right away

Latest on Tennessee quarterback battle as Volunteers finish final scrimmage

4-star OT Austin Attalah sets commitment date: Texas, USC, and Texas Tech final three

Rece Davis pushes back on Kalen DeBoer hot seat talk: 'I just don't think his job is in any jeopardy'

Reply to thread

Latest