Example of media corruption

[WVPATX]

The media is in an uproar over the appointment of Steve Bannon as Trump's strategic advisor. Bannon runs Breitbart news which the media claims has hosted articles that they deemed offensive and racist (one such article was written by David Horowitz, a jew, labeling Bill Kristol, a jew, as a Renegade Jew). They also state that Bannon supports the Alt Right movement. During the campaign, of course, they labeled Trump a racist.

On the Dem side, Hillary desperately sought support from the Black Lives Matter Movement. She also sought support from La Raza. Both have overtly racist elements in their movement. Yet, the silence is deafening from the media.

Why does the media only focus on one side in the racist debate but completely ignores the other? Do they believe that blacks and hispanics cannot be racist?

 

[moe]

The media is in an uproar over the appointment of Steve Bannon as Trump's strategic advisor. Bannon runs Breitbart news which the media claims has hosted articles that they deemed offensive and racist (one such article was written by David Horowitz, a jew, labeling Bill Kristol, a jew, as a Renegade Jew). They also state that Bannon supports the Alt Right movement. During the campaign, of course, they labeled Trump a racist.

On the Dem side, Hillary desperately sought support from the Black Lives Matter Movement. She also sought support from La Raza. Both have overtly racist elements in their movement. Yet, the silence is deafening from the media.

Why does the media only focus on one side in the racist debate but completely ignores the other? Do they believe that blacks and hispanics cannot be racist?

Did Hillary hire someone from the far left to run her campaign? Answer = No. It was bad enough for Trump to have that guy in his campaign and now Mr. Alt Right is entrenched in the White House. Sweet. Nothing to see here, keep moving.

 

[WVPATX]

Did Hillary hire someone from the far left to run her campaign? Answer = No. It was bad enough for Trump to have that guy in his campaign and now Mr. Alt Right is entrenched in the White House. Sweet. Nothing to see here, keep moving.

Hillary sought out support and endorsements from both BLM and La Raza, both racists organizations. Not a peep from the media. Not one person has posted any comment Bannon ever made that is considered racist. His employees, some of whom quit and are NEVERTRUMPers, have stated that he is not a racist and they never heard him make any racist comments. The media only point to his website (which is in the business of eliciting clicks) and thereby publish articles that are provocative. Would someone from the Huff Post be excluded from Bannon's position because of that website? Not in the world of the liberal media, I can assure you.

The media did not make one mention of Hillary seeking the support of racists organizations.

 

[moe]

Hillary seeking the support of racists organizations.

Not sure why you fail to make the distinction between your theories and things that actually happen. One happened and the other only exists in your mind. Please forgive the media for discussing Trumps questionable appointments and thinking that they are newsworthy. Do you think you'll recover from the election? from you obsession with all things Hillary (and Obama)?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Hillary sought out support and endorsements from both BLM and La Raza, both racists organizations. Not a peep from the media. Not one person has posted any comment Bannon ever made that is considered racist. His employees, some of whom quit and are NEVERTRUMPers, have stated that he is not a racist and they never heard him make any racist comments. The media only point to his website (which is in the business of eliciting clicks) and thereby publish articles that are provocative. Would someone from the Huff Post be excluded from Bannon's position because of that website? Not in the world of the liberal media, I can assure you.

The media did not make one mention of Hillary seeking the support of racists organizations.

I'm not going to presume to support Breitbart but I think there exists a million examples where we can point to the blatant hypocrisy within the media coverage of this election. Most of them have come out and said they failed to accurately depict this because they were so entrenched in blocking Trump that they lost site of what was actually resonating with the people and their legitimate concerns with Hillary Clinton. The funny thing is that all of the **** that I was talking about in the lead up to the election are reasons as to what the media is stating were real and valid concerns American's had. They reasoned that middle America agreed with them regarding Trump's trumpisms being more unfavorable than a very real and very corrupt Hillary Clinton. NYT, WaPo, and quite a few others have stated this. I've heard pundits on CNN, MSNBC and elsewhere acknowledge it as well.

 

[WVPATX]

Not sure why you fail to make the distinction between your theories and things that actually happen. One happened and the other only exists in your mind. Please forgive the media for discussing Trumps questionable appointments and thinking that they are newsworthy. Do you think you'll recover from the election? from you obsession with all things Hillary (and Obama)?

What amazes me is the lib denial of media corruption (as clearly evidence in this election) and their amazing hypocrisy.

Let me ask you a question. Can blacks or hispanics be racist?

 

[DvlDog4WVU]

Not sure why you fail to make the distinction between your theories and things that actually happen. One happened and the other only exists in your mind. Please forgive the media for discussing Trumps questionable appointments and thinking that they are newsworthy. Do you think you'll recover from the election? from you obsession with all things Hillary (and Obama)?

So Hillary didn't court BLM and La Raza? bahwhahahahah

 

[moe]

What amazes me is the lib denial of media corruption (as clearly evidence in this election) and their amazing hypocrisy.

Let me ask you a question. Can blacks or hispanics be racist?

Hillary and Trump both courted black and latino voters, not sure what's so shocking about that. You must be a blast at parties.

 

[WVPATX]

I'm not going to presume to support Breitbart but I think there exists a million examples where we can point to the blatant hypocrisy within the media coverage of this election. Most of them have come out and said they failed to accurately depict this because they were so entrenched in blocking Trump that they lost site of what was actually resonating with the people and their legitimate concerns with Hillary Clinton. The funny thing is that all of the **** that I was talking about in the lead up to the election are reasons as to what the media is stating were real and valid concerns American's had. They reasoned that middle America agreed with them regarding Trump's trumpisms being more unfavorable than a very real and very corrupt Hillary Clinton. NYT, WaPo, and quite a few others have stated this. I've heard pundits on CNN, MSNBC and elsewhere acknowledge it as well.

I think you and I were in agreement that Trump is an idiot. I voted for him as the lesser of two evils. I think we were also in agreement that Hillary was equally bad. You're observation is correct, imo. The media is not biased (bias is an unintentional slanting of the news). The media is corrupt. They decided on their candidate and their coverage reflected that decision. I have never seen the corruption so apparent and blatant. They normally hide it better than this. In the end, I think this actually helped Trump since most Americans don't trust, respect or think the media is fair.

The reason Trump won is because Americans feel that government is out of control and they want to drain the swamp. They also feel economically insecure and reason that Trump can improve the economy. They may be right, they may be wrong. This election had very, very little to do with racism or sexism.

But this blatant hypocrisy focusing SOLELY on GOP "racism" and saying absolutely nothing about Dem racism is galling. But it is part of the Dem and the media playbook and they are still running it.

 

[WVPATX]

Hillary and Trump both courted black and latino voters, not sure what's so shocking about that. You must be a blast at parties.

You've missed the point. Trump did not request the endorsement of La Raza, Clinton did. Trump did not request the support of BLM, Hillary did. Hillary would not even meet with the Fraternal Order of Police union. It's one thing to court black or hispanic voters it is quite another to seek endorsements from racist organizations.

 

[moe]

Trump did not request the endorsement of La Raza, Clinton did. Trump did not request the support of BLM, Hillary did.

Provide documentation. I'm sorry that you don't like those groups.

 

[mneilmont]

Hillary and Trump both courted black and latino voters, not sure what's so shocking about that. You must be a blast at parties.

With your limited range of thinking, do you even get invited to parties?

 

[moe]

With your limited range of thinking, do you even get invited to parties?

With your limited IQ, does someone help you get dressed of a morning?

 

[mneilmont]

Provide documentation. I'm sorry that you don't like those groups.

Like? Like? Does Hillary "like" those groups, or was she prostituting herself for their votes? Not many people see Hillary as liking anyone or anybody save herself.

 

[mneilmont]

With your limited IQ, does someone help you get dressed of a morning?

Did you miss ING? Getting dressed in the morning is not important. Usually take my shower and put PJs back on. Too busy policing the internet to waste time on dressing.

That is more proper usage. Thank you for making the corrections that I point out. Just here to help you through another day.

 

[WVUCOOPER]

With your limited range of thinking, do you even get invited to parties?

This has to be my all time favorite burn. LOL. Very Knoxian

 

[mneilmont]

This has to be my all time favorite burn. LOL. Very Knoxian

I am glad you are so easily entertained. Were you not on the Knox side of ledger? Should have picked up on his best prior to banishment.

 

[The Dunedein]

The media is in an uproar over the appointment of Steve Bannon as Trump's strategic advisor. Bannon runs Breitbart news which the media claims has hosted articles that they deemed offensive and racist (one such article was written by David Horowitz, a jew, labeling Bill Kristol, a jew, as a Renegade Jew). They also state that Bannon supports the Alt Right movement. During the campaign, of course, they labeled Trump a racist.

On the Dem side, Hillary desperately sought support from the Black Lives Matter Movement. She also sought support from La Raza. Both have overtly racist elements in their movement. Yet, the silence is deafening from the media.

Why does the media only focus on one side in the racist debate but completely ignores the other? Do they believe that blacks and hispanics cannot be racist?

Why? Clinton lost the election. Trump won the election. Trump is the President-Elect and is in the process of naming his administration. The focus is on Trump now as the man who will be President. Clinton will not be President in two months, Trump will. It is a diversion and misdirection to argue about Clinton's campaign conduct; the campaign is over. Trump's decisions will affect the country now, not Clinton's. It is healthy, and important, for the country to look closely at the people who will have the ear of the incoming President, no matter who the incoming President is. As to Bannon, specifically, it is a fair question to ask the American people if they want the person who ran an Alt-Right website to have that much influence with the President. Numerous Republican leaders have spoken out against Bannon (no, i don't have a link to all of them). Whatever Bannon's involvement or lack of involvement with any particular article, he was in charge of the business (cue Harry S. Truman re the buck). We are now talking about the President of the United States, not candidates. Clinton doesn't matter in this discussion (which should please Trump's supporters). That's probably why. If Clinton were the President-elect, i hope the media and the Republicans would do their job and closely examine the person she named as Chief Strategist. In that situation, perhaps a Mrs. Anthony Wiener would be carefully scrutinized by the media and the Republicans.

 

[BombadEER]

Provide documentation. I'm sorry that you don't like those groups.

How about you providing documentation on Bannon being a racists or anti-semite

 

[WVPATX]

How about you providing documentation on Bannon being a racists or anti-semite

He can't and that is his big problem. John Podests was a huge part of the Clinton campaign and the WikiLeaks emails proved him to be a Catholic biggot. Nary a word from the media.

This poster is claiming that because Trump won the presidency, the media should only focus on him. If I recall, before the election, both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were running for president and deserved equal scrutiny. The Liberals can't point to a single piece of evidence that Bsnnon is a bigot. They simply point to a website he ran that tried to get clicks. The same kind of website as the Huffington Post and many, many other liberal blogs. They cannot produce one person that has any evidence at all that he is a racist or anti-Jewish.

It is laughable for this poster to claim that because Hillary did not win, she therefore does not deserve any scrutiny for going after vitulent racists at BLM and La Rasa. Staggeringly hypocritical of this poster

 

[moe]

How about you providing documentation on Bannon being a racists or anti-semite

Since I didn't say that he is a racist or anti-Semite, can I skip that assignment? Apparently no one likes that assignment.

 

[WVPATX]

Since I didn't say that he is a racist or anti-Semite, can I skip that assignment? Apparently no one likes that assignment.

You can skip it because you have zero proof. But that is what libs do, especially the liberal, corrupt media, accuse without proof, especially accusing someone of homophobia, xenophobia, racisms, sexisms, etc. Such weak, intellectually dishonest arguments and past their due date. The good news is that the American people are on to the liberal media. No one trusts them. They gave 96% of their donations to Hillary. The American people believe on a 90%-10% basis, that the media wanted Hillary to win. The media is so stupid, they can't even hide their own corruption anymore.

ESPN is losing subscribers so quickly they forced their employees to stop tweeting political commentary. I wonder why?

 

[bornaneer]

Did Hillary hire someone from the far left to run her campaign? Answer = No.

John Podesta.....nothing else to say.

 

[WVPATX]

John Podesta.....nothing else to say.

Libs tend to want to forget the WikiLeaks explosion. Podesta is a virulent anti-Catholic. But silence from the Libs on this board. They accuse Bannon with zero evidence. Give Podesta a pass. Hypocrites .

 

[bornaneer]

Libs tend to want to forget the WikiLeaks explosion. Podesta is a virulent anti-Catholic. But silence from the Libs on this board. They accuse Bannon with zero evidence. Give Podesta a pass. Hypocrites .

They also forgot about the head puppeteer........ George Soros.