You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
That's worse than the greedy whores.I think I'm about the only evangelical here, and I'm voting Negan. So what's your point?
You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
That's worse than the greedy whores.
He's on an awful TV show. Vote Theo Epstein. He brought a World Series title to Boston AND Chicago.Blasphemy. He does what he says, he takes less than the federal government, and keeps rule and order. Vote Negan!
You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
Attack the messenger!You would have to opine from a position of integrity for your views to have value. Otherwise you're just another hypocrite.
Holy crap, you are still alive? Darwinism fail.Attack the messenger!
As usual you miss the point. Who is refusing to perceive the evil? The one who think they found the direction in which no evil or less evil exists. Do you still not get it? There is no where around to turn.
You may not like it but contrary to your post the messenger has a message, just click the OP's link above.As usual you miss the point. Who is refusing to perceive the evil? The one who think they found the direction in which no evil or less evil exists. Do you still not get it? There is no where around to turn.
It's meaningless because there is no better alternative.You may not like it but contrary to your post the messenger has a message, just click the OP's link above.
You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
You may not like it but contrary to your post the messenger has a message, just click the OP's link above.
It's meaningless because there is no better alternative.
Which candidate on the ballot could those guys support and save their integrity?
Which candidate ever perfectly reflected the values and principles of Jesus? Which candidate lay in modern history was even close?Since none of the candidates reflect the values and principles that Jesus taught
You have no integrity any more. Your voice is meaningless.
Ironic considering who you already voted for.How does this sound? "Since none of the candidates reflect the values and principles that Jesus taught, we are not endorsing nor supporting any of the candidates for the office of the President of the United States".
Ironic considering who you already voted for.
No, you're prancing on a football cast-off message board forum extolling the virtues of an enabler of a woman abuser, and in Weiner's case, a pedophile.I'm not parading around on tv convincing millions of others that they should vote for someone based "Christian" principles.
See the difference?
I do. I see that you are projecting a standard onto a group of people that you won't abide by yourself.I'm not parading around on tv convincing millions of others that they should vote for someone based "Christian" principles.
See the difference?
I thought you guys wanted people to stop voting based on religion? Just a guess but I bet the religious people who support Hilldabeast are OK in your book.If they were really concerned about their integrity and if they were really concerned about the potential harmful effects of making their gospel message seem fraudulent, they wouldn't support either candidate.
How does this sound? "Since none of the candidates reflect the values and principles that Jesus taught, we are not endorsing nor supporting any of the candidates for the office of the President of the United States".
I do. I see that you are projecting a standard onto a group of people that you won't abide by yourself.
No, but please try to keep up. You claimed you supported Bernie, which I rightly believe you were. He is as much of a polar opposite to Hillary as he was to Trump. Now, you have done exactly what you are condemning them for doing. You sacrificed your principles and voted for Hillary. How can you hold them to a standard of ethics you yourself are unwilling to live by? Religion actually has nothing to with the point I am making.Did I ever claim that my vote was based on religious principles?
Bingo, now you get it.
Now, you have done exactly what you are condemning them for doing.
shocking, unable to grasp concept or unwilling to accept personal hypocrisy. Either way...pretty clear to everyone the reality.They are supposedly voting for someone based on their religious beliefs. That someone possesses none of the religious qualities that they claim they espouse.
I am not voting based on religion. I am voting against a despicable dirt bag. Pretty simple.
They are supposedly voting for someone based on their religious beliefs. That someone possesses none of the religious qualities that they claim they espouse.
I am not voting based on religion. I am voting against a despicable dirt bag. Pretty simple.
You think Jesus was for abortion on demand?
You think Jesus was for abortion on demand?
So am I.I am voting against a despicable dirt bag. Pretty simple.
Jesus never even mentioned abortion. He threw money changers out of the temple. He was a socialist Jew.