Efficiency rating to date schedule adjusted per Bart

Night Man

All-Conference
Jan 8, 2006
29,783
3,710
113
Who says Pike's program has no identity, I could've told you in July we'd be here.

What I wouldn't have guessed is DEFENSIVE GENIUS MIKE WOODSON
 

Eagleton95.99

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
7,555
6,479
113
I'm guessing this is good??
I have no idea what this graph is telling me.
And the slash lines across show how the chart should be read and how to compare the teams. As you move bottom left to top right crossing lines you can see which teams are better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
Imagine where we would be if your back up 5s weren't traffic cones on defense
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Hmmm.. like that graphic.. if the numbers can be trusted...
Huskers suck both ways..
Illinis are great both ways..
Indiana is great D, suck O..
Iowa is great O, suck D
Rutgers is good D, bad O

ummm.. wait a minute.. where do you want to be on the Adj DE axis.. high or low? Typical magic-quadrant stuff would suggest you want to be up near Illinois.

ahh.. just read the comment about the slashes.. yeah.. that makes sense.. I wonder how we'd look if we tossed out our stinker games.... that is, if we assumed that we were just not ourselves vs PSU and Illinois.... where would we be? I know, every team can say that... but maybe we could put in that same effort in our better games more consistently and we've finally figured that out... doubt it.. but it is what I hope for R guys. My guess is we'd be square in the middle with MSU and OSU
 
Last edited: