Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Sports Predictions
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Toggle sidebar
Teams
Rivals300
Team Recruiting Rankings
CFB Player Rankings
Prediction Machine
Transfer Portal
Search
New posts
Toggle sidebar
Menu
Install the app
Install
As the Big Ten vs. SEC battle rages, a deeper look at how schools have fared against opponents ranked in the final AP Top 25
College football fall camp preview: Hot seats, QB battles, title contenders & more
J.D. PicKell predicts College Football Playoff, national champions
USC, Notre Dame renew rivalry with series beginning in 2030
Joel Klatt ranks top 10 college football players entering 2026 season
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does anybody else think the UNC situation....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129549718" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>Actually, no, you can't imagine that. The NCAA's toughest sanctions have involved improper benefits, i.e. players getting paid. If you look back at how the NCAA has handed out punishments previously, the UNC case is sort of uncharted waters. Will fake classes fall into the same category as paying players? Nobody really knows at this point.</p><p></p><p>Aside from that, you have the facts all mixed up. First off, UNC has been sanctioned. The football team got a bowl ban and reduced scholarships in 2012. The AFAM scandal was discovered as an offshoot of that. The state of North Carolina did its own investigation, and the NCAA followed suit. The NCAA finished the investigation and sent UNC a Notice of Allegations last fall (which is what starts the formal disciplinary procedure). They were supposed to have their hearing at the beginning of March, which is normal procedure. The hearing was delayed because UNC self-reported additional violations, which is again normal procedure. One thing I will agree with is that UNC self-reported so that the investigation would continue until after the basketball tournament. It was a calculated move by UNC, but that's how the NCAA rules are set up. The NCAA has to investigate the additional charges before the disciplinary hearing can commence.</p><p></p><p>See, that's the thing you don't get. The NCAA can't do the investigation piecemeal like you want, because the NCAA bylaws on investigations don't allow for that. They have to conduct it as one entire investigation. If the NCAA breaks its own bylaws in the investigation, then you just end up with another situation like Miami where the school gets away with everything.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129549718, member: 1459051"] Actually, no, you can't imagine that. The NCAA's toughest sanctions have involved improper benefits, i.e. players getting paid. If you look back at how the NCAA has handed out punishments previously, the UNC case is sort of uncharted waters. Will fake classes fall into the same category as paying players? Nobody really knows at this point. Aside from that, you have the facts all mixed up. First off, UNC has been sanctioned. The football team got a bowl ban and reduced scholarships in 2012. The AFAM scandal was discovered as an offshoot of that. The state of North Carolina did its own investigation, and the NCAA followed suit. The NCAA finished the investigation and sent UNC a Notice of Allegations last fall (which is what starts the formal disciplinary procedure). They were supposed to have their hearing at the beginning of March, which is normal procedure. The hearing was delayed because UNC self-reported additional violations, which is again normal procedure. One thing I will agree with is that UNC self-reported so that the investigation would continue until after the basketball tournament. It was a calculated move by UNC, but that's how the NCAA rules are set up. The NCAA has to investigate the additional charges before the disciplinary hearing can commence. See, that's the thing you don't get. The NCAA can't do the investigation piecemeal like you want, because the NCAA bylaws on investigations don't allow for that. They have to conduct it as one entire investigation. If the NCAA breaks its own bylaws in the investigation, then you just end up with another situation like Miami where the school gets away with everything. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
×
Disable Video Player
On3
Latest
01
On3
As the Big Ten vs. SEC battle rages, a deeper look at how schools have fared against opponents ranked in the final AP Top 25
02
On3
College football fall camp preview: Hot seats, QB battles, title contenders & more
03
On3
J.D. PicKell predicts College Football Playoff, national champions
04
On3
USC, Notre Dame renew rivalry with series beginning in 2030
05
On3
Joel Klatt ranks top 10 college football players entering 2026 season
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Does anybody else think the UNC situation....
Top
Bottom