Derek Simpson 2.0

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,283
50,435
113
After watching a full season of Lino Mark, I get the strong feeling this guy is literally another Derek Simpson type - has some intriguing qualities but a bad shooter at the end of the day and belongs at low major/mid major program.
 

RUskoolie

Hall of Famer
Aug 1, 2007
221,397
112,057
63
I think it's too early to say that. He's a kid I would definitely like to keep. You guys think people can't improve. Clang couldn't hit the water if he fell out of a boat.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,283
50,435
113
I think it's too early to say that. He's a kid I would definitely like to keep. You guys think people can't improve. Clang couldn't hit the water if he fell out of a boat.
Like with Simpson, there are red flags here that we witnessed this year - lacks discipline, doesn't facilitate when he can't get to the rim and poor shooting/shot selection.

While the shooting can improve, he needs to break serious bad habits for the former two. Can't be the hero when your shot keeps getting stuffed at the rim.
 

Knightmoves

Heisman
Jul 31, 2001
30,442
16,351
113
Like with Simpson, there are red flags here that we witnessed this year - lacks discipline, doesn't facilitate when he can't get to the rim and poor shooting/shot selection.

While the shooting can improve, he needs to break serious bad habits for the former two. Can't be the hero when your shot keeps getting stuffed at the rim.
Imo he has skills but mostly plays out of control on Offense. He is very quick to get into the lane but is not able to dish off or finish well at the rim. This will improve over time but I dont expect him to be a starter in a major conference next year if he leaves.

Shooting 23% on 3 point shots indicates that he’s not going to become a shooter anytime soon.

Let him go the highest bidder.
 
Last edited:

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,073
12,417
78
The difference between Derek and Lino (massive) was that Derek played alongside guys like Cliff who had proven ability and the stats to prove it when playing with different guards at Rutgers. Cliff’s numbers dropped significantly because at that time Derek couldn’t (or wouldn’t - either way failed at) getting Cliff the ball in position to do something with it.

The reality of the 2025-26 roster in the frontcourt was pretty simple. Pike had nothing. Ogbole actually seemed to improve a little down the stretch in fairness, but don’t forget how many bunnies he missed early down there either. Dylan Grant and Chris Nwuli had no ability to make anything happen when receiving the ball in the post. Buchanan simply is not a true post player - he’s a thrasher 3 who can defend bigger guys in a pinch (though not ideal of course). But he’s also not an inside / out option. Denis, Fall, Ware useless. So we had NOTHING.

The pattern was obvious against Creighton as it had been often this season. The two guards - Tariq and Lino got off to a hot start. Ogbole executed our rehearsed opening drive play that works once or twice a game. But then over time Creighton realized we had nothing inside and were able to extend the help defense out to make it harder for the guards to penetrate. Think about how many games Tariq started hot and then was contained later. This is why. (I don’t think it would be fair to take much away on Tariq vs Creighton. It’s crap what some are saying about Creighton having lengthy defenders. Their D stinks and TF was getting the same shots he always gets. It seemed pretty obvious to me the timing of his release was a tad behind usual - probably tenderness in that ankle (practice injury reported) on the jump stop. Those were shots he made all season and despite perhaps his shot not having the same smoothness - his ability to draw contact after the landing was as good as ever. Hopefully his NIL value went down a bit for us. That’d be great.

As for Lino - the point is, he’s a frosh who didn’t have a post threat to target. It doesn’t seem fair to me to judge him poorly for thinking he could draw contact at a higher rate than kicking it out to Dylan Grant and company for 3.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,831
25,514
113
The only thing I remember about Simpson is he getting to make the last shot in the loss to Hofstra.
Revisit the away game at PSU, where we came back to win after being down about 19
Towards the end of the game, the announcer said "A star is born"

Didn't happen, but he directed the RU offense very well that day

I still think.Mark has tons of potential and,I would try to keep
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUforJERSEY

NightKnight

All-Conference
Jul 21, 2008
3,207
1,606
68
Small, can't shoot from outside (22.5% from 3 is abysmal), not big on assists and paired with another small guard who is also a defensive liability -that's a bad fit. He played much better down the stretch when his back was feeling better. Never-the-less, even at his best he is a good player on an A-10 team.
 

PhillyRU

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2021
979
1,602
76
The upshot with Lino is that he’s excellent at getting to the rim and greatly improved at finishing there. Raises his ceiling as far as offensive efficiency, even if the shooting never totally materializes
 

RU-ROCS

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
12,405
7,571
113
Imo he has skills but mostly plays out of control on Offense. He is very quick to get into the lane but is not able to dish off or finish well at the rim. This will improve over time but I dont expect him to be a starter in a major conference next year if he leaves.

Shooting 23% on 3 point shots indicates that he’s not going to become a shooter anytime soon.

Let him go the highest bidder.
That 3 pt. field-goal percentage is a little deceptive because he missed his first 18 3 point attempts IIRC while adjusting to the college game. His three-point shooting percentage was considerably better down the stretch in Big Ten play. In the last 11 games he shot 39% from 3. I think he was one of the top shooters on RU during that stretch.
 

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,776
113
Like with Simpson, there are red flags here that we witnessed this year - lacks discipline, doesn't facilitate when he can't get to the rim and poor shooting/shot selection.

While the shooting can improve, he needs to break serious bad habits for the former two. Can't be the hero when your shot keeps getting stuffed at the rim.
As a point guard, Simpson had better skills, was taller, and didn't need a haircut. Mark's play might actually make good players around him less productive. He is kind of selfish.
 
Last edited:

RU MAN

Heisman
Oct 29, 2001
23,607
10,192
113
I really think it's still too early to judge him against Simpson. Yes, Lino needs to work on his outside shot, but his quickness to the basket is phenomenal compared to
Simpson. If he stays, let's see how he does with a viable center he can feed the ball to before judging him and comparing him to Simpson. BTW, I think Simpson ended up in a good place for his abilities.
 

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,512
9,816
113
The upshot with Lino is that he’s excellent at getting to the rim and greatly improved at finishing there. Raises his ceiling as far as offensive efficiency, even if the shooting never totally materializes

That 3 pt. field-goal percentage is a little deceptive because he missed his first 18 3 point attempts IIRC while adjusting to the college game. His three-point shooting percentage was considerably better down the stretch in Big Ten play. In the last 11 games he shot 39% from 3. I think he was one of the top shooters on RU during that stretch.

Agree with these. Not sure why fans think Freshman come in as fully baked cakes. They are generally inconsistent and need to develop. Lino got better as the season progressed and in conference play which is a great sign. Problem with the team was not Lino, it was that the roster was too reliant overall on Freshmen when paired with mediocre (at best) upper classmen.

For me it comes down to overall NIL budget.....If RU can bring in 3 quality players from the portal (C, Wing, PF), Lino if he chooses to stay and depending on his NIL, will be just fine on the roster next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSAL_Hoops

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,283
50,435
113
Agree with these. Not sure why fans think Freshman come in as fully baked cakes. They are generally inconsistent and need to develop. Lino got better as the season progressed and in conference play which is a great sign. Problem with the team was not Lino, it was that the roster was too reliant overall on Freshmen when paired with mediocre (at best) upper classmen.

For me it comes down to overall NIL budget.....If RU can bring in 3 quality players from the portal (C, Wing, PF), Lino if he chooses to stay and depending on his NIL, will be just fine on the roster next season.
Then why are some here insisting he's worth a $1m bag? He's nowhere near that price tag.
 

RUInsanityToo

All-American
May 5, 2006
9,512
9,816
113
Then why are some here insisting he's worth a $1m bag? He's nowhere near that price tag.

Not sure who is insisting Lino deserves $1m. Are u sure they are not referring to Tariq? Also, hard to say what anyone is worth in NIL without any type of transparency overall on NIL levels across the NCAA which may never happen.
 

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,089
10,610
82
Then why are some here insisting he's worth a $1m bag? He's nowhere near that price tag.
You compare Lino to Simpson but how about comparing him to Jacob Young who stunk his first couple of years and then became a huge player for us. Lino improved a bunch from his first game to his last game and he is further along than Young was after his freshman year. Getting on Lino for not passing to anyone of our front court players is dumb because those players were awful and he knew that he had a better chance of making shot than first trying to pass it to a guy who can't catch.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,283
50,435
113
You compare Lino to Simpson but how about comparing him to Jacob Young who stunk his first couple of years and then became a huge player for us. Lino improved a bunch from his first game to his last game and he is further along than Young was after his freshman year. Getting on Lino for not passing to anyone of our front court players is dumb because those players were awful and he knew that he had a better chance of making shot than first trying to pass it to a guy who can't catch.
It's a valid comparison of two players who recently played here as true freshman and Young had way more talent than both players. He was a 4* recruit out of HS and you could see the talent was there when he finally got on the floor at RU. Lino hasn't shown anything this year that says he can get to Young's level.

Now claiming Mark didn't pass to front court players because they were awful is outrageously dumb when Buchanan and Grant shot 46% and 44%, respectively. Ogbole was the only one with bad hands so no one is ever going to say he had to pass to him. Plus, you're completely ignoring that they ran 3 guards a lot in the small ball lineups so there was always one of Francis or Davis always on the floor with him available for a better shot than his out of control drives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Chaewsky_rivals

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,089
10,610
82
It's a valid comparison of two players who recently played here as true freshman and Young had way more talent than both players. He was a 4* recruit out of HS and you could see the talent was there when he finally got on the floor at RU. Lino hasn't shown anything this year that says he can get to Young's level.

Now claiming Mark didn't pass to front court players because they were awful is outrageously dumb when Buchanan and Grant shot 46% and 44%, respectively. Ogbole was the only one with bad hands so no one is ever going to say he had to pass to him. Plus, you're completely ignoring that they ran 3 guards a lot in the small ball lineups so there was always one of Francis or Davis always on the floor with him available for a better shot than his out of control drives.
Lino was a four star on TOS and Jacob Young was a junior when he came to Rutgers so your commentary above is just plain stupid and inaccurate. As I mentioned, Lino was much better as a freshman than Young. In fact, Young was not very good his fist half of season here even though it was his fourth season in college ball.

Did you even watch this season? Dortch and Ogbole couldn't catch and had zero inside game. Additionally, Buchanon nor Grant were any type of inside presence and you site their shooting percentages as being good. Those are not good shooting percentages for big men who would get a lot of points in the paint
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
13,969
14,900
113
Lino was a four star on TOS and Jacob Young was a junior when he came to Rutgers so your commentary above is just plain stupid and inaccurate. As I mentioned, Lino was much better as a freshman than Young. In fact, Young was not very good his fist half of season here even though it was his fourth season in college ball.

Did you even watch this season? Dortch and Ogbole couldn't catch and had zero inside game. Additionally, Buchanon nor Grant were any type of inside presence and you site their shooting percentages as being good. Those are not good shooting percentages for big men who would get a lot of points in the paint
Young's freshman year at Texas was a young roster that was worse offensively than this years RU team. Lino probably did play better than Young, but is meaningless and he still is an awful PG that doesn't look to distribute the ball at all. Like the 5th highest assist percent on this team, and the four above all had the same players to pass to.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,283
50,435
113
Lino was a four star on TOS and Jacob Young was a junior when he came to Rutgers so your commentary above is just plain stupid and inaccurate. As I mentioned, Lino was much better as a freshman than Young. In fact, Young was not very good his fist half of season here even though it was his fourth season in college ball.

Did you even watch this season? Dortch and Ogbole couldn't catch and had zero inside game. Additionally, Buchanon nor Grant were any type of inside presence and you site their shooting percentages as being good. Those are not good shooting percentages for big men who would get a lot of points in the paint
LOL, I compared two PGs who actually played at true freshman here and then you complain what about Jacob Young who didn't play here until later on. Let me make this easy Lino Mark nor Derek Simpson can carry Young's jock. Neither have the qualities that led Jacob to be a very good player.

I give you kudos with trying to shift the goal posts by frequently citing Ogbole and now Dortch who I was not ever referring to in this discussion. But you're holding on to them like Linus and his blue blanket...lol.

I apparently watched more of the season than you because Grant or Buchanan were never "big men" even though they were forced at times to play there on defense in the small ball lineups. If they were bigs, they would have played with their back to the basket at the block on offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Chaewsky_rivals

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,776
113
Lino was a four star on TOS and Jacob Young was a junior when he came to Rutgers so your commentary above is just plain stupid and inaccurate. As I mentioned, Lino was much better as a freshman than Young. In fact, Young was not very good his fist half of season here even though it was his fourth season in college ball.

Did you even watch this season? Dortch and Ogbole couldn't catch and had zero inside game. Additionally, Buchanon nor Grant were any type of inside presence and you site their shooting percentages as being good. Those are not good shooting percentages for big men who would get a lot of points in the paint
Mark will never be as good as Young was, and as a freshman I believe Young was sixth man for a better Texas team than this year's Rutgers team. Right now Mark is a mid level D1 player. Absolutely awful shooters, which he is, don't usually become good shooters, and as far as the players around him not being good enough to pass to - he doesn't even see who's open when he drives as his head is usually down.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Knightmoves

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,089
10,610
82
LOL, I compared two PGs who actually played at true freshman here and then you complain what about Jacob Young who didn't play here until later on. Let me make this easy Lino Mark nor Derek Simpson can carry Young's jock. Neither have the qualities that led Jacob to be a very good player.

I give you kudos with trying to shift the goal posts by frequently citing Ogbole and now Dortch who I was not ever referring to in this discussion. But you're holding on to them like Linus and his blue blanket...lol.

I apparently watched more of the season than you because Grant or Buchanan were never "big men" even though they were forced at times to play there on defense in the small ball lineups. If they were bigs, they would have played with their back to the basket at the block on offense.
Not saying Young played here as a freshman. He just compares to Young much more than any other player you name. Young shot 28% from floor his freshman year so thus far Lino has outperformed Young if you compare year one
 

Bob Chaewsky_rivals

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2008
7,401
4,776
113
lol Young shot 28% from floor his freshman year. Nobody knows if Lino will be as good as Young but he certainly had a better freshman year
Eye test - Mark is terrible - out of control, can't shoot, decent defender on the ball. What is worse is he doesn't even want to be here - maybe a nice fit for Santa Clara.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
13,969
14,900
113
Mark will never be as good as Young was, and as a freshman I believe Young was sixth man for a better Texas team than this year's Rutgers team. Right now Mark is a mid level D1 player. Absolutely awful shooters, which he is, don't usually become good shooters, and as far as the players around him not being good enough to pass to - he doesn't even see who's open when he drives as his head is usually down.
Pretty sure his freshman Texas team was young, and terrible. Maybe decent defensively.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,073
12,417
78
It's a valid comparison of two players who recently played here as true freshman and Young had way more talent than both players. He was a 4* recruit out of HS and you could see the talent was there when he finally got on the floor at RU. Lino hasn't shown anything this year that says he can get to Young's level.

Now claiming Mark didn't pass to front court players because they were awful is outrageously dumb when Buchanan and Grant shot 46% and 44%, respectively. Ogbole was the only one with bad hands so no one is ever going to say he had to pass to him. Plus, you're completely ignoring that they ran 3 guards a lot in the small ball lineups so there was always one of Francis or Davis always on the floor with him available for a better shot than his out of control drives.

Lol - does the type of shot they “made” not matter at all? Ogbole was actually the only one of those 3 you mention who had any ability at all to occasionally use his body to finish in the paint against high major opponents. Grant lost the ball every time he tried to do anything with it down low once conference play started. Almost all of his baskets were put backs, a couple 3s and in garbage time against lesser competition. No ability whatsoever to be a target down low. Buchanan scored almost every one of his baskets in isolation and a handful from 3. He’s not really a forward and has no post up moves to use if he were to receive the ball down low either - not against high major opposition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knightmoves

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,006
12,811
113
You compare Lino to Simpson but how about comparing him to Jacob Young who stunk his first couple of years and then became a huge player for us. Lino improved a bunch from his first game to his last game and he is further along than Young was after his freshman year. Getting on Lino for not passing to anyone of our front court players is dumb because those players were awful and he knew that he had a better chance of making shot than first trying to pass it to a guy who can't catch.

Comparing to Young is fine.
As a sophomore Young was a bench player at 16mpg.

The problem is some seem to want to designate Lino a starter and playing significant minutes next year.

If your point is Lino should be a backup PG next year and come off the bench - not sure many will disagree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-