3 more years of FACTS coming.
"Trusting the recent climate report from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is problematic due to its lack of scientific credibility, according to numerous climate experts and organizations. The report, titled "A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate," was released on July 23, 2025. It was commissioned by the current administration and written by a small group of five scientists, many of whom are known for being climate skeptics."
Key Issues with the Report
Multiple scientific bodies and climate scientists have criticized the report for the following reasons:
Lack of Peer Review and Transparency: The report was drafted in secret over a period of less than two months, without the traditional, extensive peer-review process that is standard for such scientific assessments.
Cherry-Picked Data and Misrepresentation: The authors are accused of selectively using data, misrepresenting existing scientific studies, and ignoring the overwhelming body of evidence that contradicts their conclusions. Some scientists whose work was cited in the report have come forward, stating that their research was taken out of context.
Contrarian Authors: The five authors of the report were hand-selected by the Secretary of Energy. Critics argue that they were chosen to advance a specific viewpoint rather than to provide a balanced scientific review.
Pre-Determined Conclusions: The report's findings, which downplay the economic damage of climate change and minimize the human influence on it, are seen by many as being politically motivated to justify the rollback of federal climate regulations.
Widespread Rejection
The report has been widely condemned by the scientific community. Over 85 climate experts co-authored a detailed review that found the DOE report to be biased, full of errors, and unfit to inform policymaking. The Washington State Department of Ecology also issued an official rebuke of the report, stating that it "lacks integrity" and "ignores current climate impacts."
In summary, the DOE's report is seen by most of the scientific community as a political document that does not align with the broad scientific consensus on climate change. For credible and trustworthy information, experts recommend consulting sources like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the U.S. National Climate Assessments, which are developed over years with input from hundreds of scientists and undergo rigorous peer review.
A YouTube video from a news channel discusses how scientists are pushing back against the findings of the DOE report.
Dozens of scientists slam Energy Department's report
Created with Gemini
g.co