Per D1 teams will be seeded 1-32. Makes sense because there is some wacky stuff that happens with 2 seeds.
Changes to NCAA tournament
- Thread starter premn
- Start date
I'm not sure what this is supposed to accomplish. Between the "geographical considerations" and not being able to pair teams from the same conference in a regional, it still won't be anything close to a true bracket seeding.
I think it's reached the point where more than one team per conference can be allowed to play in the same region.
The ncaa tends to send teams to the closest regional which is wrong. We should not get tough NC, SC and VA teams because they are "close." If we are a Top 4/8 seed then we need to have teams at the lower end of the Top 32 even if that means schools from UT, IL, NM, etc.
Geographic considerations leaves the door wide open to pretty much make it up as you go.
So, we are concerned about geographic considerations when the ACC and B1G have teams on both coasts.
Sounds about right.
It helps a bit but we will sellout the Bosh hosting a regional.
It is more like some ncaa clowns want to target us with tough a regional to take us down. ABCers are in all sports especially those helping the SEC.
Compare our regional with Oregon's regional last season...
Considering the insane number of not good, but GREAT teams in the south this just seems like a way to get more teams from the Northeast, Midwest and West into the CWS.
We just had Arizona in the Super and they seemed to overcome the road trip even after an 18-2 drubbing in the first game. I don't want to hear about the unfairness of having to travel.
We just had Arizona in the Super and they seemed to overcome the road trip even after an 18-2 drubbing in the first game. I don't want to hear about the unfairness of having to travel.