Can’t Wait Another Year

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,696
19,750
61
I think they're going to, but they really shouldn't.

The thing that I have a tough time with is football does have pieces to work with for next season. More rev share % for that program allows for more of an impact on the field.

If we've already determined the bball program is dead, and almost everyone knows it, how are we not giving football a bigger piece of the pie for next season? Seems really dumb to give bball 4 million (?) in rev share when you could just funnel that money to football for 2 elite defensive lineman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rume and RUChet

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,631
3,156
113
I think they're going to, but they really shouldn't.

The thing that I have a tough time with is football does have pieces to work with for next season. More rev share % for that program allows for more of an impact on the field.

If we've already determined the bball program is dead, and almost everyone knows it, how are we not giving football a bigger piece of the pie for next season? Seems really dumb to give bball 4 million (?) in rev share when you could just funnel that money to football for 2 elite defensive lineman.
Football is fools gold
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,234
176,897
113
I think they're going to, but they really shouldn't.

The thing that I have a tough time with is football does have pieces to work with for next season. More rev share % for that program allows for more of an impact on the field.

If we've already determined the bball program is dead, and almost everyone knows it, how are we not giving football a bigger piece of the pie for next season? Seems really dumb to give bball 4 million (?) in rev share when you could just funnel that money to football for 2 elite defensive lineman.
4 million saving doesnt matter
 

richthedentist

All-American
Aug 2, 2001
11,002
8,547
113
Is this going to be after every game RICH the dentist?
Yes when you have watched this team for 50 years and you sit there and watch game after game of a team that goes 40 minutes without running a single offensive set substitutions/rotations that are mind blowing and tonight the icing on the cake outrebounded by freaking PENN by 13 we are going to get annihilated in the BIG
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,631
3,156
113
The reality is, we do have offensive pieces that are high level.

I'd rather have that rev share put towards football for next season.
What a wr or two. Without a line they’re not enough to win games. You’ll blow the stack on keeping them but gone is the qb that threw to them and the line isn’t big ten caliber. Fools gold.
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,761
1,920
113
I personally believe we could go to Rucker Park, find eight guys who have never been to college, and give them scholarships and 25k each and we'd be better than the team we currently have (btw, this is basically what the Univ of Houston does), but ...

There is no money for a new coach. I wish there is, but there isn't. So stop asking for a new coach hire because you're only going to be disappointed. We can't afford one and we can't afford one for a very long time into the future. It is not going to happen.
 

shields

Heisman
Aug 5, 2002
79,811
17,715
113
I have watched for 50 years also and I am not happy either. We get it. But not all the time. We went to Final Four and recruited Todd Milligan. Two NCAA trips and we get Jalen Miller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
6,806
7,569
113
Should have gone after this guy in the portal. Has a great shooting touch and high basketball IQ.

 

dpwhite

All-American
Jan 21, 2003
2,905
7,004
103
I think they're going to, but they really shouldn't.

The thing that I have a tough time with is football does have pieces to work with for next season. More rev share % for that program allows for more of an impact on the field.

If we've already determined the bball program is dead, and almost everyone knows it, how are we not giving football a bigger piece of the pie for next season? Seems really dumb to give bball 4 million (?) in rev share when you could just funnel that money to football for 2 elite defensive lineman.
This is so dumb and not how you run a department or attract a top candidate. I get it, you’re probably a casual hoops fan, but you can’t just take all the money away. Football hasn’t done anything of note in 20 years, take the money from them-see how silly that sounds. Imagine the word that would get around? You give a coach resources to succeed and then if they don’t, then you have to move on.
 

Scarlet Shack

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
26,256
15,925
73
Here is the thing

what are we doing this year to develop to be better for next year

1.) finally …Ogoble got the bench. Leave him there . He isn’t a long term or short term answer and he just doesn’t understand how to rotate in pike defense

2.) finally …we played Dortch minures. He at least gets what we are doing on defense . He is a legit back up canter next year to the portal center we sign with the money we were chasing Devon Adkins

3.) Nuwuli on the bench does not devwkoo
Him . With orgoble needing to be on the bench ,he needs 25 minutes a game to fevelop

4.) I’m flat out ricked off thar powers didn’t play last night . He should be playing over Zrno . He will get bette defensively and he gets his shot off better arguable better than anyone on team

5.) mark finally got minures …and he must keep getting 25 minutes a game at the expense of Jmike (who just can’t get his shot off unless a rotational three )

If we had to be 6-6, it should have been pkaying Dortch , mark, powers , nuwuki and even grant more minutes …they would be further along …..

now we are going to big ten season …and we just are not going to win big ten game with Buchannan, Jmike ,
Ogoble gettong carve out. Ditto badalau , who will get massively chewed up . Zrno can get a few minutes as a spot up shooter off the bench

Play the frosh and sooh …and go through the growing pains
 

Redrich66

Junior
Sep 19, 2025
231
252
63
I personally believe we could go to Rucker Park, find eight guys who have never been to college, and give them scholarships and 25k each and we'd be better than the team we currently have (btw, this is basically what the Univ of Houston does), but ...

There is no money for a new coach. I wish there is, but there isn't. So stop asking for a new coach hire because you're only going to be disappointed. We can't afford one and we can't afford one for a very long time into the future. It is not going to happen.
Agree with you on the Rucker Park analogy. These guys (mostly) play rec league bb. No discipline, dribble drive shoot and miss, poor shooting overall, lack of rebounding.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,696
19,750
61
What a wr or two. Without a line they’re not enough to win games. You’ll blow the stack on keeping them but gone is the qb that threw to them and the line isn’t big ten caliber. Fools gold.
Blow the stack on them? Collectively what are they worth? 2.5 million? Still plenty of money leftover for other position groups. Our RB is pretty special as well.

Thanks for proving my point, having a high level offensive line sure would be nice to pair with those 3 NFL caliber players. Almost like you could achieve that by allocating the funds differently.
 

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,631
3,156
113
Blow the stack on them? Collectively what are they worth? 2.5 million? Still plenty of money leftover for other position groups. Our RB is pretty special as well.

Thanks for proving my point, having a high level offensive line sure would be nice to pair with those 3 NFL caliber players. Almost like you could achieve that by allocating the funds differently.
Do you know what linemen cost?
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,696
19,750
61
This is so dumb and not how you run a department or attract a top candidate. I get it, you’re probably a casual hoops fan, but you can’t just take all the money away. Football hasn’t done anything of note in 20 years, take the money from them-see how silly that sounds. Imagine the word that would get around? You give a coach resources to succeed and then if they don’t, then you have to move on.
First, I grew up on R Hoops, I would hardly consider myself a casual fan.

Second, this is big business, and it's time to stop pretending it's not. Mind you, I also posted a couple weeks ago that I would be okay with Hoops pulling additional funds from football IF they committed to an actual well known winning HC.

I just acknowledge that in it's current form, you're better off taking the allocated rev share and putting it towards something that you believe has a pulse at minimum.

I do not think putting 3.5-4 million into this program next season is a smart decision. That money could be used to build a very strong OL or DL which would have a far bigger impact on Rutgers than anything happening in hoops right now.

Unless you're telling me we're moving on from an assistant coach and bringing in a real offensive game plan, and we're moving on from the 5-7 player freshman classes and landing bigger, older portal players who fit the specific system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Chaewsky_rivals

dpwhite

All-American
Jan 21, 2003
2,905
7,004
103
First, I grew up on R Hoops, I would hardly consider myself a casual fan.

Second, this is big business, and it's time to stop pretending it's not. Mind you, I also posted a couple weeks ago that I would be okay with Hoops pulling additional funds from football IF they committed to an actual well known winning HC.

I just acknowledge that in it's current form, you're better off taking the allocated rev share and putting it towards something that you believe has a pulse at minimum.

I do not think putting 3.5-4 million into this program next season is a smart decision. That money could be used to build a very strong OL or DL which would have a far bigger impact on Rutgers than anything happening in hoops right now.

Unless you're telling me we're moving on from an assistant coach and bringing in a real offensive game plan, and we're moving on from the 5-7 player freshman classes and landing bigger, older portal players who fit the specific system.
I totally disagree with your sentiment. A) I don’t think you starve a coach. It’s a bad look. B) if you give the 3-4 mil to the other guy do you think you’re ever getting it back?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDiddy777

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,696
19,750
61
I totally disagree with your sentiment. A) I don’t think you starve a coach. It’s a bad look. B) if you give the 3-4 mil to the other guy do you think you’re ever getting it back?
We'll have to agree to disagree then. Your next coach isn't going to care what you did with NIL and the last guy, he just wants to know what you're going to DO with NIL for him and the position he will be in.

It's not the coach's money. It's the athletic department's money, they will decide how it's spent.
 
Jun 7, 2001
35,848
43,307
113
We'll have to agree to disagree then. Your next coach isn't going to care what you did with NIL and the last guy, he just wants to know what you're going to DO with NIL for him and the position he will be in.

It's not the coach's money. It's the athletic department's money, they will decide how it's spent.
The Athletic Department isn’t going to deprive Basketball of needed funds. Football already gets the bulk of revshare. Any additional needed will have to be donated by fans.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,301
1,809
42
I personally believe we could go to Rucker Park, find eight guys who have never been to college, and give them scholarships and 25k each and we'd be better than the team we currently have (btw, this is basically what the Univ of Houston does), but ...

There is no money for a new coach. I wish there is, but there isn't. So stop asking for a new coach hire because you're only going to be disappointed. We can't afford one and we can't afford one for a very long time into the future. It is not going to happen.
Not asking just know Pike is not coaching here next year. We have begun the HC search.
 

Luvscarletknights

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2018
3,894
4,668
113
He does it on the women's bball board too, after every win and every loss. Soccer too. Makes me laugh every game, its like a treasure hunt, lets find the thread where Rich says to fire a coach!
Especially womens soccer.....Dentist whines incessantly about 18-22 year old women. Quite hysterical 🤣. I do not even post anymore because the world is apparently always going to end.
 
Last edited:

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,342
4,644
66
Agree with you on the Rucker Park analogy. These guys (mostly) play rec league bb. No discipline, dribble drive shoot and miss, poor shooting overall, lack of rebounding.
And Rucker guys would be better shooters and be more disciplined LOL ? Less ISO? Is there an anti Rucker we don’t know about ?
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,696
19,750
61
The Athletic Department isn’t going to deprive Basketball of needed funds. Football already gets the bulk of revshare. Any additional needed will have to be donated by fans.
To be clear, I'm not arguing what I think they will do, I'm arguing what I believe they should do.

Again, if 90% of the fan base and people surrounding Rutgers believe he's a dead man walking and him being here next season is solely because we don't want to pay his buyout, then what are we doing?

We have 20.5 million to spend on athletes next season. Are we really giving a percentage of that away for the sake of being "fair." Would be a foolish decision IMO. At minimum give football an extra million and go buy a difference maker for next season.

Too many people are worried about being "nice." This isn't personal, it's business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Magoo1

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,761
1,920
113
And Rucker guys would be better shooters and be more disciplined LOL ? Less ISO? Is there an anti Rucker we don’t know about ?
They'd be more athletic and play much better 1v1 defense. Better rebounders. They'd run up and down the court on offense. They'd just be better.
 

RUDivision

All-Conference
Jan 6, 2023
2,301
1,809
42
You know this how?
I believe we now have a competent Athletic Department. There will be 2500-4000 fans in the seats by mid January. Coming off the biggest failure in college basketball last year.

By Mid - End of January the rumors will start on line and in print. Early-Mid February the names will be leaked. Gain interest in behind the scenes dialogue.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

rume

Senior
Oct 27, 2001
2,146
997
113
Not asking just know Pike is not coaching here next year. We have begun the HC search.
I believe we now have a competent Athletic Department. There will be 2500-4000 fans in the seats by mid January. Coming off the biggest failure in college basketball last year.

By Mid - End of January the rumors will start on line and in print. Early-Mid February the names will be leaked. Gain interest in behind the scenes dialogue.
It would be the best thing for men's basketball, but not the athletic department unless Pike agrees to a settlement well below the contract value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUDivision

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,642
38,123
113
Think you need staff changes, but I’d rather spend money on NIL than pay Pike 20 million not to coach and hire a coach who will have the same talent issues because he has no money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tru2ru1

dark_check

All-Conference
Mar 7, 2022
2,631
3,156
113
Think you need staff changes, but I’d rather spend money on NIL than pay Pike 20 million not to coach and hire a coach who will have the same talent issues because he has no money.
I agree the buyout is also money we don’t have to spend but not really anyone wants to invest in Pike, it’s like burning money.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,448
16,280
113
To be clear, I'm not arguing what I think they will do, I'm arguing what I believe they should do.

Again, if 90% of the fan base and people surrounding Rutgers believe he's a dead man walking and him being here next season is solely because we don't want to pay his buyout, then what are we doing?

We have 20.5 million to spend on athletes next season. Are we really giving a percentage of that away for the sake of being "fair." Would be a foolish decision IMO. At minimum give football an extra million and go buy a difference maker for next season.

Too many people are worried about being "nice." This isn't personal, it's business.
Exactly. In the corporate world, Pike would have been bought out long ago. 3.5 million per year for this shiit product is absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
Jun 7, 2001
35,848
43,307
113
Exactly. In the corporate world, Pike would have been bought out long ago. 3.5 million per year for this shiit product is absurd.
In the corporate world, Pike would have had the resources to retain Cliff, Mag, and Spencer. But this is Rutgers where people have unrealistic expectations of success, without providing the requisite support. That won’t fly any more. People have to pony up, or be content with mediocre seasons or worse.