Blowout redux stats

BeKnighted_rivals

All-Conference
Jan 15, 2003
16,269
1,360
0
Two blowouts in a row is twice as nice.

Gametracker stats, so no specialty scoring yet.

Rutgers

Tyler 21 points (9-16, 1-2 3 pt, 2-2 ft), 5 reb, 2 a, 0 s, 0 b, 3 to - she's baa-ack
Kahleah 16 points (5-9, 6-8 ft), 2 reb, 2 a, 1 s, 0 b, 2 to
Rachel 14 points (5-8, 4-4 ft), 6 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 3 b, 4 to
Betnijah 14 points (7-13, 0-2 3 pt), 5 feb, 7(!) a, 1 s, 0 b, 1 to
Cynthia 6 points (2-2 3 pt) in 3 minutes
Syessence 5 points (2-3, 1-2 ft), 4 reb, 7(!) a, 5(!) s, 0 b, 0 !) to
Ariel 2 points (1-3, 0-2 ft), 7 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 2 b, 1 to
Shrita 2 points (1-3, 0-1 3 pt), 1 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 1 to
Briyona 0 points (0-0), 2 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 0 to
Christa 0 points (0-1), 0 reb, 1 s, 1 b, 1 to
Natalie - no stats in 2 minutes
Alex - no stats in 1 minute

The team shot a great 55.2%, a nice 72.2% from the line and an excellent 42.9% from 3 (albeit on just 7 attempts). They had 35 rebounds, 18 assists, 6 blocks 13 turnovers (10 in the 1st half) and 8 steals.

The four double-digit scorers all shot over 50%, and shot 56.5% overall.


Illinois

Crawford 15 points (7-11, 1-2 3 pt, 0-1 ft), 2 reb, 6 a, 2 s, 1 b, 5 to
Simmons 12 points (4-9, 4-9 3 pt), 2 reb, 4 a, 0 s, 0 b, 4 to
Carter 11 points (4-8, 3-5 3 pt), 6 reb, 2 a, 1 s, 0 b, 0 to
White 10 points (4-15, 0-2 3 pt, 2-5 ft), 6 reb, 1 a, 0 s, 0 b, 7 to - 10 and 6 sounds okay, but she had a bad game
Coleman 4 points (1-2, 1-1 3 pt, 1-2 ft), 2 reb, 2 a, 0 s, 0 b, 2 to
Grant 2 points (1-5, 0-2 3 pt), 2 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 1 to
Hartwell 2 points (0-1, 2-2 ft) in 1 minute
Oden - 1 reb, 1 s in 5 minutes
Cattenhead - 1 reb, 1 to in 4 minutes
Tuck - 1 reb in 1 minute
McConnell - no stats in 1 minute
Kissinger - no stats in 1 minute

The Fighting Illini shot 40.4%, a fine 40.9% from 3 and a not so hot 50.0% from the line. They had 26 rebounds, 15 assists (on 21 baskets, very nice), 1 block, 21 turnovers and 4 steals.

You'd think a game in which both teams had 4 double-digit scorers would be close, but RU's top 4 almost had as many points as the entire Illinois team. Turnovers and contributions from other players (25 points for RU v. 8 for the Fighting Illini) made the difference.
 

sammybb

Senior
Jul 25, 2001
2,588
653
0
A great stat from the AP story:

The Scarlet Knights had 10 turnovers in the first half, but didn't have its 11th until the 6:20 mark of the second.


Really nice to see Scaife have a good game. Now we just need Canty to re-find her footing, and the team will start to look real good
 

chriswasky

Redshirt
Aug 9, 2011
655
1
0
Not saying anything harsh but Canty to me doesn't seem like a scorer. Didn't watch tonight but seems her shots are line drive like.

Anyway, glad Scaife had a good game. Laney continues to be tough and Copper continues her tear. Keep it up!
 

motorb54

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2005
10,060
4,434
113
A few interesting combinations on the floor last night, even before it was a blowout.
At one point Scaife, Davis and Parker were all in.
At another Butts and Evans were both in.
Haven't had enough comfortable leads for Stringer to do things like this often.
Also nice when the players who don't see the floor much get a chance to play
 

ScarletEd

Sophomore
Feb 5, 2003
2,831
152
0
Originally posted by BeKnighted:
Two blowouts in a row is twice as nice.

Gametracker stats, so no specialty scoring yet.

Rutgers

Tyler 21 points (9-16, 1-2 3 pt, 2-2 ft), 5 reb, 2 a, 0 s, 0 b, 3 to - she's baa-ack
Kahleah 16 points (5-9, 6-8 ft), 2 reb, 2 a, 1 s, 0 b, 2 to
Rachel 14 points (5-8, 4-4 ft), 6 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 3 b, 4 to
Betnijah 14 points (7-13, 0-2 3 pt), 5 feb, 7(!) a, 1 s, 0 b, 1 to
Cynthia 6 points (2-2 3 pt) in 3 minutes
Syessence 5 points (2-3, 1-2 ft), 4 reb, 7(!) a, 5(!) s, 0 b, 0 !) to
Ariel 2 points (1-3, 0-2 ft), 7 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 2 b, 1 to
Shrita 2 points (1-3, 0-1 3 pt), 1 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 1 to
Briyona 0 points (0-0), 2 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 0 to
Christa 0 points (0-1), 0 reb, 1 s, 1 b, 1 to
Natalie - no stats in 2 minutes
Alex - no stats in 1 minute

The team shot a great 55.2%, a nice 72.2% from the line and an excellent 42.9% from 3 (albeit on just 7 attempts). They had 35 rebounds, 18 assists, 6 blocks 13 turnovers (10 in the 1st half) and 8 steals.

The four double-digit scorers all shot over 50%, and shot 56.5% overall.


Illinois

Crawford 15 points (7-11, 1-2 3 pt, 0-1 ft), 2 reb, 6 a, 2 s, 1 b, 5 to
Simmons 12 points (4-9, 4-9 3 pt), 2 reb, 4 a, 0 s, 0 b, 4 to
Carter 11 points (4-8, 3-5 3 pt), 6 reb, 2 a, 1 s, 0 b, 0 to
White 10 points (4-15, 0-2 3 pt, 2-5 ft), 6 reb, 1 a, 0 s, 0 b, 7 to - 10 and 6 sounds okay, but she had a bad game
Coleman 4 points (1-2, 1-1 3 pt, 1-2 ft), 2 reb, 2 a, 0 s, 0 b, 2 to
Grant 2 points (1-5, 0-2 3 pt), 2 reb, 0 a, 0 s, 0 b, 1 to
Hartwell 2 points (0-1, 2-2 ft) in 1 minute
Oden - 1 reb, 1 s in 5 minutes
Cattenhead - 1 reb, 1 to in 4 minutes
Tuck - 1 reb in 1 minute
McConnell - no stats in 1 minute
Kissinger - no stats in 1 minute

The Fighting Illini shot 40.4%, a fine 40.9% from 3 and a not so hot 50.0% from the line. They had 26 rebounds, 15 assists (on 21 baskets, very nice), 1 block, 21 turnovers and 4 steals.

You'd think a game in which both teams had 4 double-digit scorers would be close, but RU's top 4 almost had as many points as the entire Illinois team. Turnovers and contributions from other players (25 points for RU v. 8 for the Fighting Illini) made the difference.
How can you give all those stats without telling us what the final score was?