Nothing personal, I know its not your article Greene, but thats total BS. He loves playing defense he is quoted in saying that and it has shown from all the steals and blocks in the gazillion videos online. His biggest jam in the AA game was off a steal.
Exactly. If he was a defensive stewart, he wouldn't be at Rutgers.From the article....
If Sanders played with as high of a motor on defense as he does on offense, there is no doubt he'd be amongst the five-star prospects in his class. The hyped freshman tends to take plays off on defense and lacks the consistent effort to become fully engaged on that side of the court.
I haven't seen that anywhere except for this article. If true, it is essential Jordan changes this.
From the article....
If Sanders played with as high of a motor on defense as he does on offense, there is no doubt he'd be amongst the five-star prospects in his class. The hyped freshman tends to take plays off on defense and lacks the consistent effort to become fully engaged on that side of the court.
I haven't seen that anywhere except for this article. If true, it is essential Jordan changes this.
[QUOTE="higgins3, post: 738968, member: 5098"]Exactly. If he was a defensive stewart, he wouldn't be at Rutgers.
He has the ability, just has to stay focused on that end. Same thing for the kid he grew up playnig with- Dwayne Bacon. Future NBA kid, but doesn't lock in on defense. Just has to change the habit. Guard defense is so crucial. If Sanders doesn't defend well, we will win far less games. All breaks down from the guard.
Really ? First time I heard that one.
Just what I read and saw man. Don't have to get so defensive on a message board. I t hink very highly of Sanders.
Lol[/QUOTE
What is your point again?
Sanders is a good defensive player. If he were a better defensive player he would be at B1G rival OSU or Michigan......He would not be at Rutgers......at least that's what I read somewhere
Sanders is a good defensive player. If he were a better defensive player he would be at B1G rival OSU or Michigan......He would not be at Rutgers......at least that's what I read somewhere
Sounds like Jordan has a full roster.
1. It will be up to him to change the culture. Defense, rebounding and winning 50/50s.
2. Bench has to be used. Players give it their all for 7 minutes and get rests.
3. Conditioning
If Sanders has the skills to play D, which it sounds like he does, it will be up to the staff to bring it out. If Laurent is Evil Kenievel getting thru screens we have start.
Daniels will be the other lead guard. Eddie has been clear about that, and the players skill sets makes it clear. We are fine there.I cant agree that EJ has a full roster. I don't see a backup PG or a legitimate 3 man.
Optimistically, I am HOPING that there is a viable plan to get Sanders off the court for at least 8 minutes a game so he doesn't completely wear down. I've been banging this drum for a while and no one seems to know exactly what the backup PG plan is.
More optimistically, I am HOPING that Laurent, Grier and maybe even Foreman can adequately man the 3 spot, but again, that is a hope and one without much basis in history.
Next year we may have a full roster, assuming Laurent is that 3 man, joined by Johnson and Parker to back up the point/combo guard and recruiting a promising big man to replace Lewis.
I am excited for the season.
The back up PG spot will be by committee...Daniels would be first in line there, but Williams can handle competently if not spectacularly if called upon. Grier and Goode are admittedly more one dimensional and best suited for SG duty, but Grier will play plenty in 3 guard sets.
The offense that we now employ doesn't rely on the 1-5 mindset. Sure you need little guys to handle, and big guys to rebound, but the other 3 spots are almost interchangeable. The fact that DJ Foreman might be your starting 3 right now pretty much confirms that. Our guys, save Doorson and Sanders, who's obvious best positions will probably be the only place they play this year, can flex to 2 or even 3 spots on the floor to varying degrees. That will enable Coach Jordan to do some things that he hasn't had the luxury of even thinking about his first 2 seasons.
The team has made great progress in practice in the short time there. Nobody is kidding themselves about the youth of this team and what they may have to learn game by game, both physically and X/Os wise. But damn, I'm friggin excited about this group of kids. Everyone will play a role, and it's been a long time since I could say that about a RU team.
I cant agree that EJ has a full roster. I don't see a backup PG or a legitimate 3 man.
Optimistically, I am HOPING that there is a viable plan to get Sanders off the court for at least 8 minutes a game so he doesn't completely wear down. I've been banging this drum for a while and no one seems to know exactly what the backup PG plan is.
More optimistically, I am HOPING that Laurent, Grier and maybe even Foreman can adequately man the 3 spot, but again, that is a hope and one without much basis in history.
Next year we may have a full roster, assuming Laurent is that 3 man, joined by Johnson and Parker to back up the point/combo guard and recruiting a promising big man to replace Lewis.
I am excited for the season.
They need a true Big Ten calibre Center IMO.
I'm looking forward to seeing improved D. We don't seem to be blessed with alot of outside shooters so transition baskets will be key. Our offense needs to begin the moment the opponent posssses the ball. Very excited to see this team develop beginning on Sat!!
No doubt it is a big asset in B1G play to be versatile....
6'1'' 6'3'' 6'8'' 6'10'' 7'0'' at times
6'1'' 6'3'' 6'3'' 6'8'' 6'10'' others
I am going on record that Bishop Daniels has a major role on the team and ends up our leading scorer.
We are clearly college basketball fans on this board so I get confused at folks who wonder "who will play the...". College basketball is very different than the NBA.
Who played what position for Michigan State last season? : Starters: Appling 6'1", Trice 6'0", Valentine 6'5", Dawson 6'6", Payne 6'10"
Who is the "3" on Ohio State last year? Scott 6'1", Tate 6'4", Russell 6'5", Thompson 6'7", Williams 6'11".
Like BK said above, in CBB there is a "1" and usually a "5" after that everything else is pretty much interchangeable. Not just for RU, but for just about every team.
I'm a big Daniels fan. I think he was benefit because, with Sanders, he will be able to catch passes while moving towards the rim. He should be able to use his athletic ability to finish. His main issue last year was too many turnovers while trying to dribble drive towards the basket.
I also hope to see more run outs with him and Sanders in the open court.
It isn't the guy's role in the offense (where numbers have the meaning). Looking at the 2 examples Foreman at the "3" (meaning there are 2 less agile guys on the court)....vs. Michigan State he guards Valentine---OK, vs. OSU guards Tate---NOT OK.
To me Foreman is a college tweener. His minutes become contingent on the opposition's lineup. caveat would be 1. if he is quick or becomes quicker than I thought AND 2. if he becomes the offensive weapon where we force the hand of the opposing coach to adapt to our lineup.
To your original point offensively 2-3-4 are interchangable....rarely do we see the '80s-'90s NBA prototype 4 man that is 6'9''+ that plays mostly back to the basket.