Anybody else see the reference in the commercial (forget which!) to “1876” as the date for the birth of college football?
I believe Princeton has 1869 on the front of their helmets.Well not even RU pushed its history.
They should put "The Birthplace" on rear bumper of helmet
Well not even RU pushed its history.
Because it's not. Football was played (usually as a hazing ritual) on various college campuses for decades. they also played it sporatically elsewhere without consistent rules or oversight. When Rutgers hosted Princeton on November 6, 1869 it became the birthplace of intercollegiate football. The two colleges started a chain of football happenings that continue into today. Intercollegiate football shaped the infrastructure, rules and play of American Football for the next half century.No idea why we say Birthplace of “college” football
why not just Birthplace of football
Have you thought about the location of the first football game recently? It’s a weedy, ugly parking lot with a plaque somewhere nearby and nothing else. It should be a shrine, museum and destination. But Rutgers has crapped on it. Rutgers has been such a terrible steward that I’ve been expecting somebody, something to come along and take the title away. Somebody in the administration or state should pull their head out of their *** and fix it.Anybody else see the reference in the commercial (forget which!) to “1876” as the date for the birth of college football?
IIRC, didn’t the College Football HOF make overtures to RU when they were deciding to make a new permanent home, with RU passing on the opportunity?Have you thought about the location of the first football game recently? It’s a weedy, ugly parking lot with a plaque somewhere nearby and nothing else. It should be a shrine, museum and destination. But Rutgers has crapped on it. Rutgers has been such a terrible steward that I’ve been expecting somebody, something to come along and take the title away. Somebody in the administration or state should pull their head out of their *** and fix it.
Not just ovetures. The spot the first game was played on was to be the site of the National Football Foundation's College Football Hall of Fame. Technically, the Hall was at Rutgers from 1949 through 1972 and was in eternal fund raising for a building that never got built. They had changed plans several times (the latest looked a lot like the Waksman Institute Building on Busch Campus).IIRC, didn’t the College Football HOF make overtures to RU when they were deciding to make a new permanent home, with RU passing on the opportunity?
When I attended RU 1965-1969, I 'remember' a sign where the yellow lot is that read "Future Site of the Collgege FB Hall of Fame'.Not just ovetures. The spot the first game was played on was to be the site of the National Football Foundation's College Football Hall of Fame. Techinically, the Hall was at Rutgers from 1949 through 1972 and was in eternal fund raising for a building that never got built. They had changed plans several times (the latest looked a lot like the Waksman Institute Building on Busch Campus).
Rutgers played Hall of Fame Games in the 1950s to raise money. Because the originally planned site was so crowded on campus, the HOF site was moved to be about 400 yards north of Rutgers Stadium - probably across the roadway where the Sonny Werblin Recreation Center currently sits.
I was in the same class and you remember correctlyWhen I attended RU 1965-1969, I 'remember' a sign where the yellow lot is that read "Future Site of the Collgege FB Hall of Fame'.
That's if memory serves me correctly but at this point it may not.
I always felt that if Werblin didn't die so early it would have happened here.