The real issue, however, is that Rutgers picks styles of play, especially on offense, that don't let the team play over its head--which is exactly what it needs since it will never recruit as well as many competitors. As a result, not only does it not beat ranked teams it almost never beats any team ranked higher, even relatively mediocre ones. It's not a recipe for success.LOL. A lot of the non-elite B1G teams have similar records.
I'm sure other programs in weaker conferences (in which there are many games against teams ranked, say, 20-25) will have a lot of fun with this. But they aren't playing an elite schedule like your team, with multiple TOP 10 and TOP 5 teams EVERY SEASON.
In my opinion, teams like Rutgers and Maryland should let stuff like this roll down their back...
Yeah I was surprised at that. Even Michigan doesn't have that great a record...Why 2010? Seems an arbitrary start point. 22 seasons? Why not 20? In 2009 we went 1-1 vs ranked teams.
What's worse is that this makes the whole Big Ten look bad other than Ohio State. Ahhh.. there you go... its an Ohio State brag.
Tell the **** sticks to pay us our money for all the beatings. We still have to pay back loans till 2027 because of that asinine buy in.
The Knight Report
Rutgers QB Dylan Lonergan's HS Coach Breaks Down His Game, Journey and Tape - TKR Pod
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: J'Dan Burnett
The Knight Report
The Knight Report Live Ask The Experts Chat: August 26th Edition
The Knight Report
Dylan Lonergan won the Rutgers job, now comes the part that actually matters