What is your issue with NJ.com?
Goes back a long time and I feel the attitude of NJO.com hasn't changed
Here one reason
https://www.onthebanks.com/2008/08/03/keep-digging-that-hole/
The Star Ledger (NJO.com) did a series of articles alleging improprieties, but those articles were based on falsehoods and exaggerations .
In one case a article showing there was strong oppisition to expanding Rutgers stadium was put in NJO.com by a Ledger writer.
In it she claimed to have an anonymous source that gave her the information about how there was opposition .
Checking I found the source that was being claimed as a knowledgeable one was a well known troll that posted on the NJO.com Rutgers football forum that constantly spread lies about the RU FB program, that were easily disproved .
What the ledger writer done was copy just about word for word what that troll posted in the NJO.com Rutgers forum and claimed her info was from a reliable anonymous source.
That reliable source was a troll who posted under the name anonymous
When I pointed that out in comment section, was banned and my comment taken off.
But in fairness, I did accuse the writer of article of yellow journalism .
Also there was an article implying that an investigation of Rutgers turned up a hidden clause in Coach Schiano's contract that wasn't released by the University.
It turned out that clause was released at the time the contract was signed and reported in a ledger article by a journalist who had left that rag.
Their reporting was so biased against Rutgers that Rutgers fans took up a collection and bought an advertisement in that paper to refute all of the lies that paper printed .
I saved the ad on computer but readable version went poof and all I can post is this copy
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640x480q90/924/gTlJZO.jpg