This is just plain dumb. Judging a long-term coaching hire by how their team did in season 1? I guess 1-10 Kirk Ferentz was a much worse hire than the hundreds of coaches at other programs who have come and gone since him and started with better records.
Indiana will be fine. They had FOUR different scholarship guys out for the season with injuries. Josh Harris is a 4 star guy who averaged 13 points and 7 rebounds last year and didn't play a game this year. They brought in a point guard transfer who averaged 11 pts last year who also never played at all. Even the crown jewel of their portal class, Tucker DeVries, was a shell of himself averaging just 13 pts and 5 rbs after off season shoulder surgery. He was a 47% shooter from 3 last year at West Virginia and was expected to be a star this year. Things happen.
McCullum was fortunate enough to bring over an in-state all-American senior point guard who single handedly carried the rest of the portal transfers, a group of mediocre role players. Had he been injured this year, I'm not sure Iowa would have been a .500 program. That would have been ZERO reflection on the coaching hire. And even with Stirtz, Iowa is a #9 seed and Indiana was one of the first 4 out. That's a very small gap.
I hope for Iowa's sake they can rebuild next year after the loss of Stirtz. But it's not easy to catch that kind of lightening in a bottle twice. If Combs is running the offense next year, we're in trouble. Meanwhile, Indiana is already reloading. They've got commits from three Top 100 high school kids and we'll see what they do in the portal. Ben has struggled to get commits thus far, but it's too soon to tell how he is as a recruiter.