Do you think Nebraska new football facilities look as good as this with all the bell and whistle?
Do you think Nebraska new football facilities look as good as this with all the bell and whistle?
No it’s 155M.Nebraska is only spending $135 mil for the athletics training and locker room facility which is still a lot. Comparison to Alabama's $288 mil football facility, who knows what Nebraska facility will look like when its done. With building materials in 2022 skyrocketing, they're gonna need more than $135 mil. Originally the work was on schedule at this stage for a summer 2023 opening For Nebraska to compete with other facilities around the country but that might be pushed back.
I already donated some money to the new facility during the Glow Big Red campaign week..There are financial problems. I’m sure they will get funding diverted to football but Trev said recently they won’t be able to complete the new outdoor track facility as planned and will have to undertake additional fund raising
Money, followed by coaches fluffing recruits, followed by winning, followed by everything else, is what pulls kids into the fold.Not all recruits can play football at Alabama no matter how much is spent. Nebraska will have top ten facilities by all accounts and it will appeal to some top recruits/transfers but winning is what pulls kids into the fold.
I think albert said because bids were locked in, before the material increases, they were going fourthNebraska is only spending $135 mil for the athletics training and locker room facility which is still a lot. Comparison to Alabama's $288 mil football facility, who knows what Nebraska facility will look like when its done. With building materials in 2022 skyrocketing, they're gonna need more than $135 mil. Originally the work was on schedule at this stage for a summer 2023 opening For Nebraska to compete with other facilities around the country but that might be pushed back.
Trev is failing big time. Maybe he'll just start cutting sports and that will solve the problem.There are financial problems. I’m sure they will get funding diverted to football but Trev said recently they won’t be able to complete the new outdoor track facility as planned and will have to undertake additional fund raising
Derp!Trev is failing big time. Maybe he'll just start cutting sports and that will solve the problem.
Trev is failing big time. Maybe he'll just start cutting sports and that will solve the problem.
Shame on you for comparing Trev to Eichorst and Pederson. Trev would never hire a bum like Mike Riley unlike Eichorst and unlike Steve Pederson, he would not try to reinvent Nebraska's image.That’s the common thought among boosters and admins in Lincoln. Trev had a very abrasive manner that does not mesh well with his employees. We will soon long for the days of Eichorst/Pederson. Can’t get much worse than that
Don’t want to do the Minnesota way unless it’s a last resortTrev is failing big time. Maybe he'll just start cutting sports and that will solve the problem.
That’s the common thought among boosters and admins in Lincoln. Trev had a very abrasive manner that does not mesh well with his employees. We will soon long for the days of Eichorst/Pederson. Can’t get much worse than that
The buildings at Harvard and Yale are 150 years old and they still get many of the best students.Recently saw an article ranking the top 25 facilities in the country. Big Red was nowhere to be found. I remember my last visit there thinking it seemed very dated. This talk that they are among the top facilities in the country, needs to be put out to pasture.
There are financial problems. I’m sure they will get funding diverted to football but Trev said recently they won’t be able to complete the new outdoor track facility as planned and will have to undertake additional fund raising
Nebraska isn't getting the best players, not by a longshot. Will better facilities help? Debatable. For a program desperate to even sniff some of its past success, a facility on par with the top 25 at least provides the optic that they care about winning.The buildings at Harvard and Yale are 150 years old and they still get many of the best students.
Facilities don't win games. Coaches who have charisma and talent to recruit and coach win games.
From the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, Miami was the one of a couple dominant forces in college football, and their facilities then are eclipsed by many high schools now. Terrible locker and training facilities, no indoor practice facility to get out of the searing heat and humidity, and shoot, they didn't even have a stadium so they had to rent one of the oldest stadiums on the country.
But what they did have was Jimmy Johnson and Dennis Erickson, two great coaches with great schemes and with staffs who could recruit.
It's funny. I know that the 1994 Miami team had Sapp, Lewis, and a couple of good WRs, but past that, their talent that year was frankly not to the level of most Miami teams, like the ones in the late 1980s and early 2000s. Their QB was really average and their OL was frankly weak. But yet Erickson and 2 extremly talented players were able to keep them in the game until they just got worn out.
A lesser coach would have lost that game to the talent laden Huskers (Frazier, Phillips, Wiegert, Stai, Peter, Jones, Stewart, Williams, etc.) 40-7. The only reason why Miami was able to hang in that game was Sapp and Lewis. Without them, Nebraska would have done to Miami the same thing they did to Florida the following year.
Optic Smoctic! Great facilities are a smokescreen.Nebraska isn't getting the best players, not by a longshot. Will better facilities help? Debatable. For a program desperate to even sniff some of its past success, a facility on par with the top 25 at least provides the optic that they care about winning.
Harvard and Yale are ivy league schools not fbs schools so that makes a big difference. Top notch facilities and winning makes a big difference with top recruits in this new Gen Z time. Its a different time and era compared to the 80's 90's, and early 2000's when there was no social media around that time.The buildings at Harvard and Yale are 150 years old and they still get many of the best students.
Facilities don't win games. Coaches who have charisma and talent to recruit and coach win games.
From the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, Miami was the one of a couple dominant forces in college football, and their facilities then are eclipsed by many high schools now. Terrible locker and training facilities, no indoor practice facility to get out of the searing heat and humidity, and shoot, they didn't even have a stadium so they had to rent one of the oldest stadiums on the country.
But what they did have was Jimmy Johnson and Dennis Erickson, two great coaches with great schemes and with staffs who could recruit.
It's funny. I know that the 1994 Miami team had Sapp, Lewis, and a couple of good WRs, but past that, their talent that year was frankly not to the level of most Miami teams, like the ones in the late 1980s and early 2000s. Their QB was really average and their OL was frankly weak. But yet Erickson and 2 extremly talented players were able to keep them in the game until they just got worn out.
A lesser coach would have lost that game to the talent laden Huskers (Frazier, Phillips, Wiegert, Stai, Peter, Jones, Stewart, Williams, etc.) 40-7. The only reason why Miami was able to hang in that game was Sapp and Lewis. Without them, Nebraska would have done to Miami the same thing they did to Florida the following year.
I'll be completely honest and I don't think that I'm alone here, but if what you say is true and it's all about attracting a bunch of Gen Z narcissists, then I'll spend my Saturdays in the fall coaching youth football and leave these people to wallow in their own crap.Harvard and Yale are ivy league schools not fbs schools so that makes a big difference. Top notch facilities and winning makes a big difference with top recruits in this new Gen Z time. Its a different time and era compared to the 80's 90's, and early 2000's when there was no social media around that time.
You might be not be alone but you’re in the minority on this subject..I'll be completely honest and I don't think that I'm alone here, but if what you say is true and it's all about attracting a bunch of Gen Z narcissists, then I'll spend my Saturdays in the fall coaching youth football and leave these people to wallow in their own crap.
Besides, I thought Alabamas new facilities were shared for all sportsNo it’s 155M.
Thx! Folks talking out of their bungholes in this thread.No, there isn't.
The track itself is complete, which was phase 1 around $10M. The stands are part of phase 2 and the only bid they received is higher than what was (I believe $6M) initially budgeted for.
Baseball has massive improvements in the early stages. That wouldn't happen with "financial problems".
Trev Alberts is the best thing to happen to the Huskers Athletics program since Tom Osborne was roaming the sideline as head coach. Ronnie Green, as well as a few elected officials, have been a road bump.
If I ever long for the days of those two ******** then someone needs to please shoot me in the gotdamn head asap.That’s the common thought among boosters and admins in Lincoln. Trev had a very abrasive manner that does not mesh well with his employees. We will soon long for the days of Eichorst/Pederson. Can’t get much worse than that
Damn guys and their facts.No, there isn't.
The track itself is complete, which was phase 1 around $10M. The stands are part of phase 2 and the only bid they received is higher than what was (I believe $6M) initially budgeted for.
Baseball has massive improvements in the early stages. That wouldn't happen with "financial problems".
Trev Alberts is the best thing to happen to the Huskers Athletics program since Tom Osborne was roaming the sideline as head coach. Ronnie Green, as well as a few elected officials, have been a road bump.