A New RAC

RU72

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
8,240
5,638
0
In 5 years or so we will not recognize the RAC.Thete are a few models being explored and they all,as they should involve luxury boxes which are true money makers. All but one were sold out last night at the Pru. The site will be the same. But it will be a re-build up and not out. My hunch is 10000 seats.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,702
19,759
61
In 5 years or so we will not recognize the RAC.Thete are a few models being explored and they all,as they should involve luxury boxes which are true money makers. All but one were sold out last night at the Pru. The site will be the same. But it will be a re-build up and not out. My hunch is 10000 seats.
None of the builds should include luxury boxes.

The RAC isn’t a place you go to sip on wine and eat catered chicken fingers.

We’re going to sell our souls for a few extra bucks and it’s going to **** the RAC up.

Just add sections in the corners where you can get waiters and waitresses to bring food that you order on your phone and call it a day.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,195
12,454
113
In 5 years or so we will not recognize the RAC.Thete are a few models being explored and they all,as they should involve luxury boxes which are true money makers. All but one were sold out last night at the Pru. The site will be the same. But it will be a re-build up and not out. My hunch is 10000 seats.
It has to be a rebuild out to get more space for rest rooms,refreshments and a new entrance to the RAC along with seating reaching 10.000 .
 

RU72

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
8,240
5,638
0
Even if we added seats, where would they come? The corners by the student sections?
This is not idle speculation. The money will be raised and bonds will be floated. The model is what was done at Assembly Hall. Luxury boxes are mandatory from a financial perspective. Obviously,the refreshments and bathrooms will be far enhanced and expanded.I agree with such a project.
 

cm_13

All-American
Aug 28, 2018
2,641
5,551
73
None of the builds should include luxury boxes.

The RAC isn’t a place you go to sip on wine and eat catered chicken fingers.

We’re going to sell our souls for a few extra bucks and it’s going to **** the RAC up.

Just add sections in the corners where you can get waiters and waitresses to bring food that you order on your phone and call it a day.
Is adding sections to the corners really feasible with the huge support columns in the four corners? I’m not an expert on the subject by any means but those look structurally important.
 

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
This is not idle speculation. The money will be raised and bonds will be floated. The model is what was done at Assembly Hall. Luxury boxes are mandatory from a financial perspective. Obviously,the refreshments and bathrooms will be far enhanced and expanded.I agree with such a project.

What did IU do to expand?
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,076
15,458
72
I see no downside to the improvements mentioned, and as a 30-year season ticket holder I would welcome them. The real unique aspect of the RAC is the steep vertical incline of the seating. If that’s maintained then I say bring on the rebuild. If that has to go then I would not be as enthused.
 

cm_13

All-American
Aug 28, 2018
2,641
5,551
73
agree, its not seats we need, its amenities and walking space.
That seems like the easiest win to me.

The sloped ceilings limit how much seating you could realistically add behind either of the baskets anyway, and the number of seats really isn’t the issue here. It’s the lack of amenities and space we have when the arena is sold out at its current capacity that is an issue.
 

wheezer

Heisman
Jun 3, 2001
169,833
25,517
113
I see no downside to the improvements mentioned, and as a 30-year season ticket holder I would welcome them. The real unique aspect of the RAC is the steep verticality of the seating. If that’s maintained then I say bring on the rebuild. If that has to go then I would not be as enthused.
That was my question

A renovation might require the steep verticality to be changed due to codes
If so, forget it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,702
19,759
61
Is adding sections to the corners really feasible with the huge support columns in the four corners? I’m not an expert on the subject by any means but those look structurally important.
Im no engineer, but RU is supposed to be pretty damn good for that, so they should be able to figure it out.

You can maintain the structural integrity and build around it.

It’s not about adding more seats, it’s about closing gaps to make the place louder.

I’d also close the open space above 118.

The problem is they’re going to look at a fix and it’s going to be ways to increase revenue, which I understand. The issue is the revenue you’d been generating is really a drop in the bucket. Focus on improving the experience from an atmosphere perspective and the revenue will be there.

I feel this way about football too. Eventually when you decide to add seats we should be closing gaps and focus on creating a hot ticket, not more seats. Supply and demand; the lack of seats in an amazing atmosphere will generating more revenue.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,408
148,458
113
None of the builds should include luxury boxes.

The RAC isn’t a place you go to sip on wine and eat catered chicken fingers.

We’re going to sell our souls for a few extra bucks and it’s going to **** the RAC up.

Just add sections in the corners where you can get waiters and waitresses to bring food that you order on your phone and call it a day.
Luxury boxes are a must to monetize an arena properly.
 

SBP

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
4,739
4,657
113
It needs to build out for a new entryway, too, more bathrooms…it’s a literal clusterfuck now
 
Last edited:

satnom

All-American
Jun 28, 2002
6,955
8,538
88
I’m for whatever keeps the uniqueness of the RAC, expands more seating/food/bathrooms, allows students to make up a good portion of one side of the lower sideline [moves a portion of the old crowd to new area], generates more revenue and more WINS.

GO RU
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I see no downside to the improvements mentioned, and as a 30-year season ticket holder I would welcome them. The real unique aspect of the RAC is the steep vertical incline of the seating. If that’s maintained then I say bring on the rebuild. If that has to go then I would not be as enthused.
The downside is if we are the 28 years of the past 30 years and there is low demand for luxury seating and the athletic budget just got bigger without enough of an increase in revenue.

The probability of athletics ceasing at Rutgers in the next 15 years increases with this type of idea.
 

srru86

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
17,880
4,199
113
None of the builds should include luxury boxes.
I don't disagree with the sentiment but it's not realistic.

It's been said plenty of times. RU does not have a athletics spending problem (despite what the faculty union wants to people to think). The key difference with our competitors is we don't generate the same amount of revenue.
The options are:
  1. Sell alot more t-shirts and hot dogs
  2. Expand the seating capacity
  3. Raise ticket prices
  4. Build and sell luxury boxes
I don't think 1 is going to do it. And I like 4 more than 2 or 3.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,702
19,759
61
Luxury boxes are a must to monetize an arena properly.
Luxury boxes will only work in an arena in downtown New Brunswick, you cut deals with corporations to purchase them. People take the train in after work to catch a game.

Rutgers’ target demographic is blue collar right now, not white collar IMO.
 

Anon1751594821

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2001
2,555
2,358
0
In 5 years or so we will not recognize the RAC.Thete are a few models being explored and they all,as they should involve luxury boxes which are true money makers. All but one were sold out last night at the Pru. The site will be the same. But it will be a re-build up and not out. My hunch is 10000 seats.
It will definitely be built out at the entrance. Not sure why you don't think so. That is the space that we have and will build a new entrance and expand it.

Best of Luck,
Groz
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008

pmvon

All-American
Jan 30, 2007
7,614
7,169
0
I like it. Feel like it makes visiting fans coming for the first time think “Wtf am I about to walk into?” as they approach the arena.
Haha. Yeah I can see that. Psychological warfare starts before the even get in the building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,076
15,458
72
The downside is if we are the 28 years of the past 30 years and there is low demand for luxury seating and the athletic budget just got bigger without enough of an increase in revenue.

The probability of athletics ceasing at Rutgers in the next 15 years increases with this type of idea.
Gotta invest in the future. We’re in the B1G now, with more B1G money on the horizon. Can’t cheap out now.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
247,299
176,981
113
They need to do something with the outside look. It’s brutal.


agree there is no excuse that they couldnt come up with ideas to make it more pleasant looking with landscaping as well...I realize that they are probably waiting for a bigger plan but geez its been dystopian since the 80s
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Gotta invest in the future. We’re in the B1G now, with more B1G money on the horizon. Can cheap out now.
That is the alternative POV. Investing in something doesn't create demand that isn't there.

Is demand there?

There is a ton of money out there, at least for now (SPOILER ALERT)
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,405
28,548
113
Serious question had the AD been measuring the decibel level two seasons ago and this year? Wonder what it averages and reaches and then separately if it’s considered at all In any renovation plans
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
Im no engineer, but RU is supposed to be pretty damn good for that, so they should be able to figure it out.

You can maintain the structural integrity and build around it.

It’s not about adding more seats, it’s about closing gaps to make the place louder.

I’d also close the open space above 118.

The problem is they’re going to look at a fix and it’s going to be ways to increase revenue, which I understand. The issue is the revenue you’d been generating is really a drop in the bucket. Focus on improving the experience from an atmosphere perspective and the revenue will be there.

I feel this way about football too. Eventually when you decide to add seats we should be closing gaps and focus on creating a hot ticket, not more seats. Supply and demand; the lack of seats in an amazing atmosphere will generating more revenue.
Rutgers also supposedly has a good agricultural school , but yet couldn’t figure out how to grow proper grass in piscataway.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,076
15,458
72
That is the alternative POV. Investing in something doesn't create demand that isn't there.

Is demand there?

There is a ton of money out there, at least for now (SPOILER ALERT)
Yes, there is enough demand there, enough to justify this investment. What’s the alternative? Just let the RAC rot and hope that whatever demand we may have just dries up? I don’t understand this defeatist view, coming from a fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersDunedin

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,219
57,191
113
That was my question

A renovation might require the steep verticality to be changed due to codes
If so, forget it
That's a full-blown rebuild, not renovation, and I believe the luxury boxes will be placed behind the basket opposite the student end of the building.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Yes, there is enough demand there, enough to justify this investment. What’s the alternative? Just let the RAC rot and hope that whatever demand we may have just dries up? I don’t understand this defeatist view, coming from a fan.
Most of the potential revenue that can be had is based on the product on the floor. I don't think there is a ton of demand lost because of what the building looks like.

Open question as I have no idea......is the Audi club 100% filled with season tickets?
 

MLBash93

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2012
1,507
2,175
113
Im no engineer, but RU is supposed to be pretty damn good for that, so they should be able to figure it out.

You can maintain the structural integrity and build around it.

It’s not about adding more seats, it’s about closing gaps to make the place louder.

I’d also close the open space above 118.

The problem is they’re going to look at a fix and it’s going to be ways to increase revenue, which I understand. The issue is the revenue you’d been generating is really a drop in the bucket. Focus on improving the experience from an atmosphere perspective and the revenue will be there.

I feel this way about football too. Eventually when you decide to add seats we should be closing gaps and focus on creating a hot ticket, not more seats. Supply and demand; the lack of seats in an amazing atmosphere will generating more revenue.
Above 118 is where the handicap section is, and I think there is a rule in place that we can't take that away
 

Anon1751594821

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2001
2,555
2,358
0
Serious question had the AD been measuring the decibel level two seasons ago and this year? Wonder what it averages and reaches and then separately if it’s considered at all In any renovation plans
There were people that came around with meters to all areas of the arena 2 years ago to measure noise, etc. Haven't seen any this year yet.

Best of Luck,
Groz
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,026
12,829
113
It's like shooting fish in a barrel on this board.

Prudential Center: SHU is again thinking small. Why won't they open up the upper deck? Who cares if it ruins their home court advantage - they are REFUSING money! Thinking small again.

Adding luxury boxes to RAC: NO!!!!! The RAC isn't a place for luxury boxes. Who cares if it'll bring in much needed additional money.


I mean, we could just become a better team on the court and not have to rely on the RAC to win games.
Plenty of other teams seem to win games and have successful programs without the RAC.