Appreciate smashmouth football.....
Check out @SportsSturm’s Tweet:
Check out @SportsSturm’s Tweet:
Brings a nostalgic tear to the eye.Appreciate smashmouth football.....
Check out @SportsSturm’s Tweet:
Appreciate smashmouth football.....
Check out @SportsSturm’s Tweet:
Man i saw this live and thought the same thing...got lost in tbe crap that came after. But was nice to seeIn case anyone didn't notice...
100% agree with this post.I would love to evolve to a Wisconsin type offense - I do wonder, however, that given the current state of the offensive line, would that allow for a rapid improvement.
It is my understanding that one of the advantages that these spread type offenses have is that it allows for a potentially prolific offense in the absence of a above average offensive line. The ball is out of the QBs hand very quickly negating the need for prolonged pass protection. The run game is based on spreading the defense out and running between wide gaps with quick hitters.
The offensive line doesn't necessarily need to move people off the ball.
If you can't run between the tackles - your run game becomes bubble screens, WR screens etc. Basically what Ark St did to us.
I am not necessarily advocating for this approach just wondering what type of offense has the potential to be most effective if your offensive line talent is limited. I am becoming increasingly convinced that pro-style offenses work great as long as you have pro-level talent particularly along the offensive line.