Toggle sidebar

Zuckerberg - “Researcher“ For Tax Avoidance

fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
Interesting this comes after he visited Mar-A-Lago and Trump last week. Trump said he asked him to commit to free speech. Credit to Zuck for a full response. At least he realizes he got cucked unlike some of the left. That MMA might be doing him some good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dmk and TigerGrowls
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
Zuck is a cuck



 
  • Like
Reactions: LafayetteBear
W

WapPride

All-American
Mar 17, 2021
3,977
6,344
0
Zuck bending over to appease Trump, who has made it no secret he intends to go after the opposition, is not surprising in the least. Zuck's policies tend to go in whichever direction the current administration supports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73, kudzuking and UrHuckleberry
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
ANEW said:
So i guess Zuckerberg is a Nazi eymathizer now.
Click to expand...
You could say that unless you can imagine this happening under any other administration in the history of this country. It's not something he would have done without the fear of what this fascist administration would do to harm his business interests and you know it.
 
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
WapPride said:
Zuck bending over to appease Trump, who has made it no secret he intends to go after the opposition, is not surprising in the least. Zuck's policies tend to go in whichever direction the current administration supports.
Click to expand...
Correct.

The party that does not censor your speech is the correct party. Glad that he came around.

The thing is, even if Democrats were to regain control, Elon has shown Zuck how to tell the Feds to **** off. He was too much of a pvssy the first time. But now he has Dana White on his side. Very smart branding move by Zuck and whatever he is paying Dana is not enough.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: JohnHughsPartner, Dmk, TigerGrowls and 2 others
ANEW

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,166
113
dpic73 said:
You could say that unless you can imagine this happening under any other administration in the history of this country. It's not something he would have done without the fear of what this fascist administration would do to harm his business interests and you know it.
Click to expand...
Look on the bright side. Without fact checkers that are in collusion with the government, meta users won't have to worry that their posts from inside the Trump concentration camps will be censored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls, SGTiger, Allornothing and 1 other person
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
ANEW said:
Look on the bright side. Without fact checkers that are in collusion with the government, meta users won't have to worry that their posts from inside the Trump concentration camps will be censored.
Click to expand...
Another highlight to opening the platform to droves of maga disinformation agents is the campers will be told they're at a resort for a vacation and they'll be none the wiser.
 
W

WapPride

All-American
Mar 17, 2021
3,977
6,344
0
dpic73 said:
Another highlight to opening the platform to droves of maga disinformation agents is the campers will be told they're at a resort for a vacation and they'll be none the wiser.
Click to expand...
Eh, all it's doing is allowing Zuck an excuse for laying off an entire department of people under the guise of letting users moderate themselves. The optics of moving what's left from California to Texas is hilarious and something only idiot chuds will celebrate since it doesn't change anything, but it LOOKS like a major change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
A

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
12,245
13,578
113
dpic73 said:
Another highlight to opening the platform to droves of maga disinformation agents is the campers will be told they're at a resort for a vacation and they'll be none the wiser.
Click to expand...
Only you know the truth dickpick (@dpic73 )! You are the only one who knows all this truth.

Who chooses what is disinformation? I for 1 don't want YOU making that determination.

By ALL your previous post, anyone who doesn't agree with you is spreading disinformation. Step outside the basement you live in. DJT's election should have showed you the truth.

The American people don't agree with you.

Only Communist are picking up what you're putting down.

Now, run along, and see if the gov't has put a new check in your mailbox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy and SGTiger
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
Allornothing said:
Only you know the truth dickpick (@dpic73 )! You are the only one who knows all this truth.

Who chooses what is disinformation? I for 1 don't want YOU making that determination.

By ALL your previous post, anyone who doesn't agree with you is spreading disinformation. Step outside the basement you live in. DJT's election should have showed you the truth.

The American people don't agree with you.

Only Communist are picking up what you're putting down.

Now, run along, and see if the gov't has put a new check in your mailbox.
Click to expand...


Let me know if I need to spell this out for you.
 
A

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
12,245
13,578
113
dpic73 said:

Let me know if I need to spell this out for you.
Click to expand...
Why can't you just STFU?

That's because the TRUTH is not on your side. You're a miserable human being and I'm glad I'm not associated with you in any way.

Why not say you were wrong?

Why don't you say you were wrong about many things?

I know why! You're a narcisstic POS, and your way is the only way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
fatpiggy said:
Correct.

The party that does not censor your speech is the correct party. Glad that he came around.

The thing is, even if Democrats were to regain control, Elon has shown Zuck how to tell the Feds to **** off. He was too much of a pvssy the first time. But now he has Dana White on his side. Very smart branding move by Zuck and whatever he is paying Dana is not enough.
Click to expand...


 
Last edited by a moderator:
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
fatpiggy said:
A poll he didn't like.

That poll was fraudulent by all reasonable measures. A statistical impossibility. Lol at being butthurt over that.
Click to expand...
What gives him the right to sue a pollster because he doesn't like the results? It is not a statistical impossibility that the sampling was different than the results of the vote, but even if it was fraudeulent, a poll is just a poll and isn't responsible for his win/loss. GD man, you'll give him a pass for anything, no matter how absurd.

The inmates are completely taking over the asylum and his disgusting news conference today was an omen for the most nauseating, incomprehensively stupid four years in our history to come. God help us
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
dpic73 said:
What gives him the right to sue a pollster because he doesn't like the results? It is not a statistical impossibility that the sampling was different than the results of the vote, but even if it was fraudeulent, a poll is just a poll and isn't responsible for his win/loss. GD man, you'll give him a pass for anything, no matter how absurd.

The inmates are completely taking over the asylum and his disgusting news conference today was an omen for the most nauseating, incomprehensively stupid four years in our history to come. God help us
Click to expand...
Actually, it was a statistical impossibility.
 
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
fatpiggy said:
Actually, it was a statistical impossibility.
Click to expand...
It was also a statistical impossibility that he won 2020 just because he said so but that didn't stop him from repeating it for perpetuity now did it? But again, you're missing the point. Trump is all about that free speech unless he doesn't like what a pollster/network or author says. In other words, free speech for pro-Trump speech ONLY.
 
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
dpic73 said:
It was also a statistical impossibility that he won 2020 just because he said so but that didn't stop him from repeating it for perpetuity now did it? But again, you're missing the point. Trump is all about that free speech unless he doesn't like what a pollster/network or author says. In other words, free speech for pro-Trump speech ONLY.
Click to expand...
No. The poll was a fraud
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
SGTiger

SGTiger

Heisman
Jul 10, 2008
46,370
12,658
113
Allornothing said:
Only you know the truth dickpick (@dpic73 )! You are the only one who knows all this truth.

Who chooses what is disinformation? I for 1 don't want YOU making that determination.

By ALL your previous post, anyone who doesn't agree with you is spreading disinformation. Step outside the basement you live in. DJT's election should have showed you the truth.

The American people don't agree with you.

Only Communist are picking up what you're putting down.

Now, run along, and see if the gov't has put a new check in your mailbox.
Click to expand...
 
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
And before we go any further, lol, can yall confirm what her poll showed and what the actual results were.

Then please show the margin of error on her poll.


It was fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SGTiger
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,702
23,062
113
fatpiggy said:
And before we go any further, lol, can yall confirm what her poll showed and what the actual results were.

Then please show the margin of error on her poll.


It was fraud.
Click to expand...
I will admit I’m ignorant here, is that a realm or area where fraud is a real charge? And lying isn’t considered free speech? Like, are polls regulated like that?

(For the record, I am not condoning anything, just think it’s funny how often people are ok with their side doing something, just not the other)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Dadar, fatpiggy and SGTiger
dpic73

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
35,400
32,480
113
fatpiggy said:
And before we go any further, lol, can yall confirm what her poll showed and what the actual results were.

Then please show the margin of error on her poll.


It was fraud.
Click to expand...
Does that give him the right to sue any pollster that showed Kamala winning? What about suing CBS for editing someone else's interview?

Enough with your red herring
 
K

Kelbo

Heisman
Sep 5, 2015
8,635
24,833
101
dpic73 said:
No, it clearly states I'm in no mood to debase myself enough to have a debate with a vile idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about - ever.
Click to expand...
My hope is you’re able to support your President & America.
 
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
UrHuckleberry said:
I will admit I’m ignorant here, is that a realm or area where fraud is a real charge? And lying isn’t considered free speech? Like, are polls regulated like that?

(For the record, I am not condoning anything, just think it’s funny how often people are ok with their side doing something, just not the other)
Click to expand...

She published something like Kamala +11 or something stupid. The actual result was Trump +11 or something like that.

The margin of error on her poll was presumably less than 5%.

So she missed by a large number. Probably 15 points outside the margin of error. I’ll repeat that, outside the margin of error. By 150%

That is fraud.

I don’t know if he will win, but there is certainly a case to be made.
 
fatpiggy

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
27,468
26,357
113
It’s not a free speech issue. She did nothing criminal.

You can say whatever you want, but you can’t intentionally deceive. That is fraud.

You can say what you want, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be repercussions.
 
UrHuckleberry

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,702
23,062
113
fatpiggy said:
It’s not a free speech issue. She did nothing criminal.

You can say whatever you want, but you can’t intentionally deceive. That is fraud.

You can say what you want, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be repercussions.
Click to expand...
What type of fraud?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SGTiger
You must log in or register to reply here.
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Football Right now Clemson Football is hard to watch
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Football CLEMSON FOOTBALL: The Day After
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Football Clemson outclassed by No. 4 Miami in 41-13 loss
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated Football Clemson runs into too much firepower from No. 4 Miami in 41-13 loss
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Football Clemson - Miami Postgame Notes
Top Bottom