Football Greg Schiano set to return in 2027

Section124

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
17,588
23,554
96
Just catching up on this now. Very disappointing and this is a joke program.
That letter probably just sealed me no longer being a season ticket holder after 35+ years. Best case is I keep 2 tickets just to keep my points. Donations at min levels like Al.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
24,399
13,027
113
With new playoff format power conferences will be looking to replace losing programs (such as Rutgers) with winning ones to improve strength of schedule. So don’t be surprised if in a year or two Big 10 schools vote to show RU the door.
More reason a change should have been made. The fiscal implications get a whole lot more pronounced if that happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: runrutgersrun

rutgersguy2

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
5,428
2,700
112
Problem is many fear it might be more than one year.
I think next year should be it if he can't reach a reasonable win total which IMO is 8 wins. There are just 3 coaches who have gone to year 8 without a winning conference record, Schiano, Locksley, Wilcox.

This year I had said 4 wins would probably be enough to keep him on because of the money and the new DC having just gotten a 3 year deal made me think he'd at least see 2 years of it.

I thought 2-3 wins might be so disastrous to get over the inertia of the money and then the UMass loss happened and people with supposed connections saying he's gone and I thought okay maybe they will find the money. Nope. So in retrospect, I think he could have gone winless this year and he wouldn't have been let go. Money was the biggest factor overriding everything.

Now I go back to my original assumption that next year is make or break. It's just a matter of what's the bar? It should be a winning conference record and just because precedence across the sport and having 2 admins serious about results when money is less of a factor I think it realistically might be the bar. I wish some media would ask that question but not sure they'd answer it. Also next year the buyout is low double digits. Wilcox last year and Lockley, Aranda, Doeren this year were all fired with low double digit buyouts so I'm also taking that as a blue print of what's manageable for pretty much any athletic department.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

Pils86

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2008
1,837
1,411
113
Embarrassing and disappointing. He is dead man walking and his decision making is getting worse as he gets older. He is a net negative on the program now. The AD office is historically incompetent yet no one suffers a consequence. The new AD is here 15 months making $100k per month and what has changed? Can't find $2 million per year to hire Harasymiak? Will anything be different next year?
 

RUChet

All-Conference
Apr 8, 2023
3,370
4,118
113
I agree somewhat.
If those numbers are correct, Rutgers doubled its losses at the end of 2024 to the end of 2025 in a single year. And this is after Rutgers receiving nearly a full share (or is it a full share) of their media rights money. Only at Rutgers can such inefficiencies happen (maybe that's hyperbole-but Rutgers is very good at losing and wasting money).

Can only imagine what the losses will look like for 2026.
Why only somewhat? We are broke and in debt. Awful financial standing and with arguably the worst P4 sports success. Except men’s soccer!
 

ClassOf02v.2

Heisman
Sep 30, 2010
14,008
15,674
103
What a day to be so busy at work that I didn’t have a chance to check in.

Bummer, but not really a surprise. We’re biting the bullet for another year. Cut the size of Greg’s staff. Hell, cut the football rev share by 20% and decide where it’s best spent among the other programs. We’re likely to suck next year anyway. Kelli can’t fire him this year, but she can curtail him.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
24,399
13,027
113
What a day to be so busy at work that I didn’t have a chance to check in.

Bummer, but not really a surprise. We’re biting the bullet for another year. Cut the size of Greg’s staff. Hell, cut the football rev share by 20% and decide where it’s best spent among the other programs. We’re likely to suck next year anyway. Kelli can’t fire him this year, but she can curtail him.
But can she ? Wouldn’t be surprised if Greg’s retains all control of his Budget, even the ludicrous bulging Staff
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,615
16,558
113
Goodbye season tickets

**** Rutgers and its admin including Tate and Keli Zinn

Clowns bringing back a 2-10 coach telling us straight faced to support and donate

Extend him at 5-7!

Stop playing fans for fools

Rutgers is not serious about winning athletics
You’re assuming Greg is going to keep ZInn and Tate.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
34,021
38,550
113
It's meant for them too. Al's a master baiter, and people jump into his little circle jerks like lemmings. He's making fools out of a lot of people, and he is getting his jollies.

You are being far too emotional about all of this. It's a business decision, and we have to embrace the suck for another year. That said, I can understand if some fans want to tap out. Losing and bringing the guy back who is responsible for losing is quite deflating.

We’ll all be back once we field a competitive team. But yeah, don’t think we can expect much out of 2027.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
34,021
38,550
113
With new playoff format power conferences will be looking to replace losing programs (such as Rutgers) with winning ones to improve strength of schedule. So don’t be surprised if in a year or two Big 10 schools vote to show RU the door.

That’s silly. We’re still the cash cow for the conference. That isn’t going to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wagram97

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
38,367
60,817
113
And with that, I think that's going to be the end of a 21 yr. run. Just can't see the appeal of spending 8 hrs. on Saturdays with Greg Schiano any longer.

Good luck Keli on getting a$$es in the seats but, ain't nothing going to change with that man. You have a defensive head coach who doesn't know how to fix a defense. You can't fix stupid.
 

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
24,399
13,027
113
We’ll all be back once we field a competitive team. But yeah, don’t think we can expect much out of 2027.
The huge IF …..Greg Schiano fielding a competitive team in ‘27. Vegas was right this season and their projections will be lower next year. Fat Chance all or even that many will be back in Piscataway.
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
34,021
38,550
113
The huge IF …..Greg Schiano fielding a competitive team in ‘27. Vegas was right this season and their projections will be lower next year. Fat Chance all or even that many will be back in Piscataway.

He won’t. There will be change in 28. It is what it is.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
91,976
90,157
113
 

AdventureHasAName

All-Conference
Mar 1, 2022
1,972
2,097
113
You’re just repeating yourself and I suspect you don’t really follow bball. A legit B1G 5 costs well north of what Ace and Dylan got - and neither maxed out what they could get from NIL since they’ll end up making 10 figures by the time they retire. If you followed the team, the supporting cast was very weak (part of that was absolutely on a strategic failure by Pike, part on the fact that he didn’t have money).

Football got 20+ million this year. Thats middle of the pack. Basketball got 10, that’s middle of the pack. Basketball got less than 3 last year and even less the year before. Hobbs wasn’t raising money.
An average mens basketball coach takes two lottery picks and three guys from Rucker Park (playing for beer money) and makes the Sweet 16.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob Chaewsky_rivals

Scarlet Blind_rivals

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2001
4,737
4,817
62
The extension that keeps on giving

2019 Schiavo 8yr $32M
2020-23 19-28 (9-27)
2023 Extension 2030 6 yrs, $37.5M($6.25M per)
24-present 15-20 (7-17) 3 games left 2026.

16-44 0.267 vs B1G

Really earning that.$2M raise, isn't he?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fat Koko

RU#1fan

Heisman
Mar 7, 2003
24,399
13,027
113
If they were gonna keep him, it's about damn time they announced it. The good thing is that we should be able to keep the recruiting class together.
Clueless fool.
You think a 58th Ranked Recruiting Class is something we should be worried about? There are only 68 P4 teams. Dup
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
198,535
151,313
113
Not happening with Schiano. Mark it down for next season. Ceiling is 5 wins if we get lucky: Akron, LIU, BC ( maybe but O’Brien will Coach circles around Schiano), Maryland, and maybe maybe Michigan State on the road.
Maryland will get a better coach. MSU already has one. Those are two Ls.

3 wins next year. None of it matters. This is all just a financial play to get closer to a tolerable buy out.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
198,535
151,313
113
The real question is why would any real player want to come play for a lame duck coach like Schiano? The only logical reason is we are going to pay more. So we are paying a premium for talent which means we will have less of it. Also, Schiano is a culture guy. How is he going to instill his family bs with a ln entire roster of one year rentals?
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
34,021
38,550
113
I might not like the return of Greg, but I expected Schiano to return

>Money is part of the equation. NJ.com reported Schiano would be owed $18 million if fired after this season, plus another $10 million for his staff. <.

>Schiano’s first run in Piscataway, from 2001 to 2011, is still why he gets this kind of rope. He took over one of the worst programs in major college football, went 68-67 and led Rutgers to six bowl games in seven seasons, going 5-1 in those games.<

https://www.footballscoop.com/2026/11/10/greg-schiano-will-reportedly-return-at-rutgers-next-fall

I interpret this as:
He's only coming back because it's too expensive to fire him right now

>Reports began circulating on Tuesday morning before athletic director Keli Zinn confirmed the news in a statement.

““I also have an obligation to make decisions that serve the best long-term interests of Rutgers University,” Zinn said. “There are several factors that go into decisions regarding the hiring and retention of head coaches in all of our sports, especially football and basketball. After weighing all factors, and consulting with University leadership, Head Coach Greg Schiano will be returning in 2027. Let me be very clear: this decision is not reflective of a lowering of standards or an indication that everything is fine. It is not.”<


https://www.onthebanks.com/rutgers-...return-as-rutgers-football-head-coach-in-2027

Im surprised she wasn’t blinking in Morse code. Long term = I’m keeping what little money we have for a coach, staff and players who will actually win.
 

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
7,740
8,937
113
The real question is why would any real player want to come play for a lame duck coach like Schiano? The only logical reason is we are going to pay more. So we are paying a premium for talent which means we will have less of it. Also, Schiano is a culture guy. How is he going to instill his family bs with a ln entire roster of one year rentals?
I would love to get a copy of the Schiano plan. My first question would have been.
Why is this your plan now?
followed by
Why wasn’t this implemented prior?
Brown better be writing one helluva check. Because he is holding this university as a whole back at this point.
 

ClassOf02v.2

Heisman
Sep 30, 2010
14,008
15,674
103
Maryland will get a better coach. MSU already has one. Those are two Ls.

3 wins next year. None of it matters. This is all just a financial play to get closer to a tolerable buy out.
I think it’s obvious we have no choice to just suck up another year. Said this in the other thread, but I wonder how much latitude there will be for Kelli to hamstring Greg — force him to cull the staff significantly, reduce the rev share percentage that football gets and spend it elsewhere for a year. Or will it be another year of “OK Greg, giving you everything you need to succeed….sink or swim.”
 

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
34,021
38,550
113
The real question is why would any real player want to come play for a lame duck coach like Schiano? The only logical reason is we are going to pay more. So we are paying a premium for talent which means we will have less of it. Also, Schiano is a culture guy. How is he going to instill his family bs with a ln entire roster of one year rentals?

Just write off football and count the days until bball starts. Suspect men’s and women’s will be tourney bound next year - I’m really bullish on this years team and think the tourney return is sooner rather than later. As you said, Pike with money is infinitely more competent than Greg.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
36,151
56,049
113
I think it’s obvious we have no choice to just suck up another year. Said this in the other thread, but I wonder how much latitude there will be for Kelli to hamstring Greg — force him to cull the staff significantly, reduce the rev share percentage that football gets and spend it elsewhere for a year. Or will it be another year of “OK Greg, giving you everything you need to succeed….sink or swim.”
Her efforts are to get the spend back to reasonable levels which is why who traveled to away games was drastically changed this year. I'm certain the headcount is square in the crosshair where some expiring contracts won't be renewed and others may leave and not be replaced.

They are not doing anything to remove NIL or revenue share, but nothing says that Greg and his GMs know how to use it properly.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
91,976
90,157
113
@Richie O -Why did Tango have to start his own thread an hour after yours? Guy is out of control again clogging the board with duplicate and useless threads.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers Chris

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
252,924
181,921
113
I think next year should be it if he can't reach a reasonable win total which IMO is 8 wins. There are just 3 coaches who have gone to year 8 without a winning conference record, Schiano, Locksley, Wilcox.

This year I had said 4 wins would probably be enough to keep him on because of the money and the new DC having just gotten a 3 year deal made me think he'd at least see 2 years of it.

I thought 2-3 wins might be so disastrous to get over the inertia of the money and then the UMass loss happened and people with supposed connections saying he's gone and I thought okay maybe they will find the money. Nope. So in retrospect, I think he could have gone winless this year and he wouldn't have been let go. Money was the biggest factor overriding everything.

Now I go back to my original assumption that next year is make or break. It's just a matter of what's the bar? It should be a winning conference record and just because precedence across the sport and having 2 admins serious about results when money is less of a factor I think it realistically might be the bar. I wish some media would ask that question but not sure they'd answer it. Also next year the buyout is low double digits. Wilcox last year and Lockley, Aranda, Doeren this year were all fired with low double digit buyouts so I'm also taking that as a blue print of what's manageable for pretty much any athletic department.
He is 100% back if 6 wins. More than likely at 5
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,790
4,919
66
I want to know what Minnesota’s board looks like. To me, that’s what we can and should be. My only positive is that GS and staff know next year is do or die. Hope GS gets more hands-on D. We need to get lucky to get a serviceable QB. Let’s hope hoops can do better.
It’s not do or die. He’s never been held accountable for sucking at his job and he’s certainly not going to be beginning next year.
 

rutgersguy2

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
5,428
2,700
112
He is 100% back if 6 wins. More than likely at 5
6 wins is 3-6 in conference…5 wins is 2-7 in conference. If he lasted til year 9 on that kind of result, Wilcox would be the only one similar and he got fired in the middle of year 9. Nothing changes with more time in terms of meaningful and notable results. It’s just wasted time. Next year is more financially feasible and we’ve seen Wilcox, Aranda, Locksley and Doeren be let go while owed basically the same ballpark in the low double digits.

If they’re serious like they say they are then it shouldn’t be acceptable anymore when finances are doable. Someone should ask them or ask Tate in one of those X threads. Does he need a winning conference record next year (meaning 8 wins) to stay on. There should be an explicit clearly stated goal. Everyone should know what the bar is and what’s needed.
 

Rob from NJ

Sophomore
Jul 8, 2025
72
148
33

Where I disagree on Forde is spending the money on players. Any available money needs to be banked in a fund to pay off what remains of Schiano and Staff's buyout after the 2027 season. There is no shred of evidence that Schiano can achieve anything more than 7-6, however, its not the record that speaks volumes. It's how he achieves the 7-6 record that tells how low expectations are. He beats 3 cream puff OOC opponents and 2027 is lined up for that. LIU and Akron, the worst team in the MAC + a Boston College team that he gets to play on the home field. We'll call BC an Unknown at this point. And then he finds 3 Big Ten teams that are having miserable seasons with losing records such as a Maryland that is just starting to build with a 1st year HC. Any Big Ten team with a winning record is an automatic loss.

Some Rutgers fans who continue to live in the past call the above means to a 7-6 record as progress. For them the expectations are based on historical failure and are set really really Low.

Personally that above path to 7-6 is failure once again. A 3-6 Big Ten record beating 3 teams that are losing to the rest of the Conference as well is not really competing. We'll continue to hear Schiano's spin where he proclaims beating any Big Ten Team is an achievement due to the difficulty of the Conference. That's hogwash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy2
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football star wideout KJ Duff ruled out for rest of season
  2. 02 On3 Football College Football Announcer Schedule: Broadcasters for top Week 11 games
  3. 03 On3 Football ESPN updates FPI rankings for each Big Ten football team after Week 10
  4. 04 The Knight Report Basketball Rutgers vs. Monmouth: How to Watch, Starting Lineups, Rankings & More
  5. 05 The Knight Report The Knight Report - Ask The Experts Chat: November 11th Edition