"Our facilities and resources are middle of the pack in the SEC."
Based on your "middle of the pack"
logic we should be able to win 50%
of SEC gamed every year.
Of course not. Simply having nice facilities doesn't make you a winner.
"Our facilities and resources are middle of the pack in the SEC."
Based on your "middle of the pack"
logic we should be able to win 50%
of SEC gamed every year.
It is. This spell sucks, but maybe we just have to ride it out. I had previously advocated for giving Beamer a 10-year contract (@KingWard has advodated for a lifetime contract....maybe he's walked that back lol).
My rationale is that we've largely been doing the same thing over and over and over and expecting a different result. We change a coach after 5 or 6 years and start all over and end up getting the same result.
Our history is rock solid. We're never going to be great. But we're also never going to be awful for a prolonged period. We are consistently mediocre (or slightly worse) with the occasional really bad year or two and the rare good year. It's who we are. It's been proved over decades and decades of coaching and player changes. Let's face it, we had two HOF football coaches back-to-back for nearly a 20-year span and never built a consistent winner. It just ain't happening. Our Cignetti moment will never come.
I'm willing to bet if we gave Beamer a 10-year contract, after 10 years, we'd be about the same as we historically have been. On the other hand, if we fired Beamer and burned through 2 other coaches, after 10 years, we'd be about the same as we always have been.
Maybe we just embrace a guy who loves being here, has a good culture in the program, family loves the area, a guy and family who are well-liked by everyone. Maybe we say "Hey, we want to keep here a long time, but we can't pay you $8 million/yr for these results" and reach some agreement. Who knows, maybe the continuity would end up in him building a consistent 7-8 win team. Probably not, but I also don't think it would run the program into the ground.
If we won 50% of SEC games every year, we would be doing better than our history suggests we would."Our facilities and resources are middle of the pack in the SEC."
Based on your "middle of the pack"
logic we should be able to win 50%
of SEC gamed every year.
If we could, we would have done it by now.If we won 50% of SEC games every year, we would be doing better than our history suggests we would.
An interesting take. Thanks for sharing.It is. This spell sucks, but maybe we just have to ride it out. I had previously advocated for giving Beamer a 10-year contract (@KingWard has advodated for a lifetime contract....maybe he's walked that back lol).
My rationale is that we've largely been doing the same thing over and over and over and expecting a different result. We change a coach after 5 or 6 years and start all over and end up getting the same result.
Our history is rock solid. We're never going to be great. But we're also never going to be awful for a prolonged period. We are consistently mediocre (or slightly worse) with the occasional really bad year or two and the rare good year. It's who we are. It's been proved over decades and decades of coaching and player changes. Let's face it, we had two HOF football coaches back-to-back for nearly a 20-year span and never built a consistent winner. It just ain't happening. Our Cignetti moment will never come.
I'm willing to bet if we gave Beamer a 10-year contract, after 10 years, we'd be about the same as we historically have been. On the other hand, if we fired Beamer and burned through 2 other coaches, after 10 years, we'd be about the same as we always have been.
Maybe we just embrace a guy who loves being here, has a good culture in the program, family loves the area, a guy and family who are well-liked by everyone. Maybe we say "Hey, we want to keep here a long time, but we can't pay you $8 million/yr for these results" and reach some agreement. Who knows, maybe the continuity would end up in him building a consistent 7-8 win team. Probably not, but I also don't think it would run the program into the ground.
And he was not fired. Just resigned the HC position and remained AD as Warren Giese took over the HC duties.Rex Enright was HC for 15 seasons and his record was 64 wins,69 losses & 7 ties . His name is still prominent in Gamecock history. So maybe it is not wins and losses but how you play the game.
If we won 50% of SEC games every year, we would be doing better than our history suggests we would.
it's not all that good either! I have grown tired of Beamer's bs!We have 10 (or 11) top 25 finishes in our entire history (that statistic is sad enough to warrant its own post...). Beamer has 2 of those. That's really not all that bad. Fan favorite Joe Morrison only had 2. Lou Holtz only had 2. If this season goes as it is tracking, Beamer will have 3 good/ok years and 3 bad years. All things considered for Gamecock football, that's ok-ish. Morrison also had 3 good years and 3 bad/ok years. Holtz had 3 good/ok years and 3 bad years (even his last year we were 6-5 (4-4) which sounds like a dream right now).
Maybe Beamer's tenure has to be evaluated in terms of where we've come from vs where we hope to get.
"Our facilities and resources are middle of the pack in the SEC."
Based on your "middle of the pack"
logic we should be able to win 50%
of SEC gamed every year.
GamecockCentral Football
South Carolina-Kentucky: Instant thoughts, key moments, what this loss means
TheBigSpur Football
#24 Kentucky 35, South Carolina 34 | Rapid Reaction
GamecockCentral Football
What gives Shane Beamer confidence he can turn season around after South Carolina's third straight loss
GamecockCentral Womens Basketball
South Carolina women's basketball: Gamecocks in the WNBA - Semifinals preview
GamecockCentral Football
Inside the snap count: South Carolina vs. Kentucky