Not until August, 1945. And all we had was two.We had a couple- they were for a war that we were actually in- with Japan
Edit: the Trinity test was July 16th.
Last edited:
Not until August, 1945. And all we had was two.We had a couple- they were for a war that we were actually in- with Japan
We had fire bombed Tokyo with similar results . Some speculate that Hiroshima and Nagasaki was as much about getting Soviet attention as ending the conflict with Japan.Not until August, 1945. And all we had was two.
Edit: the Trinity test was July 16th.
Exactly. Britain and the US, in the fall of 1944 should have told the Germans "pull back to your pre-1940 borders in the West and we will not invade Germany."England and France declared war on Germany for invading Poland. Then we allowed Poland and Eastern Europe to be subjected to an equally oppressive Soviet regime. Lot's of young men lost their lives for what? We could have liberated France and negotiated a truce in July 1944. One thing to remember, USSR had a massive army in the field but we had nuclear weapons. In history much like football, hind sight is 20-20.
The Ukraine War could easily be attributed to Russian fears of Western intensions. For that reason and the massive losses the USSR suffered in WW2, IMO Ukraine should not be given NATO membership.
So we weren’t in a war in Europe? Patton was a bad general? I’m confused.We had a couple- they were for a war that we were actually in- with Japan
So we weren’t in a war in Europe? Patton was a bad general? I’m confused.
Marshall. A little late, but the greatest lend lease item sent to the Soviets was the Studebaker trucks. Over 600, 000 were sent. These trucks enabled the Soviets to move men and materials at faster rate which helped the massive Soviet offensives in 44-45 where the Soviets covered huge expanses of territory.If anyone is nuts, it's 1300. Also factually challenged.
So, sit it out while the death camps went ahead behind a secure western border?Exactly. Britain and the US, in the fall of 1944 should have told the Germans "pull back to your pre-1940 borders in the West and we will not invade Germany."
The Germans could have concentrated their forces on the Eastern front, and while the Soviets still would have won, they would have bled each other dry. Tons of American and British lives saved, Germany defeated, the Soviets in no condition to turn Eastern Europe into a fiefdom....
20/20 hindsight.
Also, it wasn’t until the war was over that the United States and England were able to confirm that the Germans were way behind in developing an atomic bomb. That was one reason for the urgency of the Manhattan Project: beat the Germans to the bomb.So, sit it out while the death camps went ahead behind a secure western border?
Not quite. “By November-December 1944 it had been concluded that there was no threat of a German atomic bomb.”Also, it wasn’t until the war was over that the United States and England were able to confirm that the Germans were way behind in developing an atomic bomb. That was one reason for the urgency of the Manhattan Project: beat the Germans to the bomb.
To possibly prevent the Cold War? Yes.So, sit it out while the death camps went ahead behind a secure western border?
The war in Europe was over. Patton was brilliant- but nuts.So we weren’t in a war in Europe? Patton was a bad general? I’m confused.
Cool. Read Antony Beever on WW2 (May have been re: the eastern front) but I didn't know he wrote about Arnhem. Thanks for the recommendation!Great find! Thanks for posting!
I read “A Bridge Too Far” many times. The mistakes made were simple in the planning but catastrophic in their devastation.
The Brits at Arnhem were totally hosed, and the Poles who dropped with them several days later also suffered mightily. I was angered when I visited Arnhem when I learned just how much the limeys scapegoated the Poles for the failure of the final phase when Monty’s plan and the weather colluded.
One of the things that really was impressive to me was how narrow the Lower Rhine was at Arnhem and how amazingly wide the Waal/Rhine was at Nijmegen. The amphib assault there, the crossing led by Maj. Julian Cook (Redford on film), is really a feat of arms for the 82nd. The inability of the 82nd to capture the bridge at Nijmegen was a significant hindrance to the success of the operation. The heroism of those troopers that day is something that should be long-remembered. And to a man they believed that succeeding in their mission that day would enable the Brit armor to get to Arnhem to relieve their airborne brothers in arms. ‘Twas not to be.
I can talk all day about this stuff. For another great read, consider Antony Beevor’s “Battle of Arnhem.” It does not sugarcoat the failures by the Brits in planning.
BWI Football
How Penn State Uses Josiah Zayas and Zion Tracy So Differently at the Same Position
BWI Football
Everything Matt Campell said to explain the Penn State 4th and 1 fourth quarter plan, timeout usage, vs. Wisconsin
BWI Football
Top Tuesday takeaways from Penn State offensive coordinator Taylor Mouser: On 3rd and long runs, red zone issues, more
BWI Football
Penn State head coach Matt Campbell Press Conference: Northwestern
BWI Football
Live updates: Matt Campbell weekly press conference