Read option is not RPOI went through the exercise of rewatching all of Brown and Heck's passing/running snaps. I charted each play with some brief notes and assigned a score of +1 positive / 0 neutral / -1 negative. For some added context, there were both completions and incompletions that I would consider 'neutral' plays. Completions where it was a short throw to a schemed up wide open receiver that any middle school QB could hit would be a neutral completion example. For example, Heck's touchdown pass I graded as neutral. Hats off to Lester on those. There were also some incompletions I considered 'neutral', where the QB made the best he could out of a play, or it wasn't a necessarily egregious miss.
Overall my general thoughts were that both quarterbacks were unfortunately even worse than I had initially thought. Both had some positive moments, but also a fair share of bad misses and turnover worthy plays. They were also about as even as can be in positive/neutral/negative plays made. Below is how things shook out:
Total passing plays (plus the one RPO with Heck):
Brown - 23
Heck - 18
Positive / Neutral / Negative plays
Brown - 9 / 6 / 8
Heck - 7 / 5 / 6
Turnover worthy plays
Brown - 2
Heck - 1 (the actual INT, although this was 4th and goal where he threw up for grabs to avoid sack)
One other item to note. On Heck's passing plays, over half (or 9 of 17) came on what would be considered obvious passing downs (2nd and 7 or more, 3rd and 5 or more or 4th down). These are naturally going to be more difficult to convert as the defense is expecting pass. While only 8 of Brown's 23 passing plays came in these obvious passing down situations. They also passed way more on first down with Brown, 13 of his 23 pass plays vs. only 4 of 17 passing on first down for Heck.
Overall it was extremely even between the two in regards to the number of positive plays and negative plays with bad misses and near turnovers. I would like to see more from both before anointing either of them the full time starter. I simply don't believe we've seen enough to know who will be the better option for when we get into Big Ten play and see tougher competition. Gun to my head right now I would lean Heck. Yes he had some absolutely terrible misses (so did Brown), but I like his mobility in the pocket better than Brown, and Brown really scares me with his locking in on wide receivers. More so than the two turnover worthy plays Brown had on Saturday, the more telling miss for me was the miss he had to Diaz on the left side of the field on 3rd and 4 near the end of the first half. NIU basically brought a four man rush that was picked up, but Brown for whatever reason panicked and quickly threw it out to the left on his back foot and without setting his feet. Not a good look, as I've long been a believer that pocket presence is maybe the most important skill for a QB to have. If this is an issue with Brown, it will be magnified when we start to face better defenses.
Yes I'm aware, simple mistake. Any thoughts on the rest of the post?Read option is not RPO
That wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.You'd rather have 15 yards of field position over a 50/50 ball for a possible TD? Ball on the 20 is still not good field position.
It wasn't a good pass, and he missed Diaz for a wide open TD on the drive before. With that said, the Oline needs to be able to punch in a run from 2 yards out with a 1st down. The read option looked great with Heck at QB, and it would be great to explore that more. Maybe Brown wouldn't have taken the INT, but it would have likely been a sack near the 15, so it's basically a wash.That wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.
Yes agree, ball definitely could have been better. I was only arguing that I'd much rather see the ball thrown there vs taking the sack, and I think most coaches (and mathematicians) would agree. He didn't get a good loft on the throw thoughThat wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.
We'll know much more after this week on the QBs. Charged up environment, playing a better team, etc....NIU was so damn bad, it's hard to tell anything.
We'll know much more after this week on the QBs. Charged up environment, playing a better team, etc....NIU was so damn bad, it's hard to tell anything.
You'd chance a pick 6, or a larger chuck of yardage considering how close the throw was to the line of scrimmage?You'd rather have 15 yards of field position over a 50/50 ball for a possible TD? Ball on the 20 is still not good field position.
You are bad at math and guessing.Yes agree, ball definitely could have been better. I was only arguing that I'd much rather see the ball thrown there vs taking the sack, and I think most coaches (and mathematicians) would agree. He didn't get a good loft on the throw though
Lol did you really just copy/paste some AI bs for your response?You are bad at math and guessing.
Throwing the ball away is always better. Throwing it away stops the play with no risk and results in a turnover on downs at the original line of scrimmage. Throwing an interception gives the defense the ball and allows them to run it out or potentially score.
Why Throwing the Ball Away is Better
- Field Position: The other team gets the ball right where you started the play.
- No Return Risk: A bad pass thrown out of bounds cannot be caught by the other team.
- Safety: It prevents a turnover touchdown or a long return by the defense.
What Happens with an Interception
- Touchback Risk: If caught in the end zone and downed, the defense gets the ball at their own 20-yard line.
- Return Danger: If the defender runs the interception out of the end zone, they can advance the ball or score.
- Wasted Down: You still lose possession either way on 4th down.
Lol at worrying about a pick 6 there. You sound like you would make a very scared football coach.You'd chance a pick 6, or a larger chuck of yardage considering how close the throw was to the line of scrimmage?
Plus there is a geater chance for a safety at the 2 and getting the ball back.
Fine I guess I'll respond to your AI slop. Obviously throwing it away is better when the two options are an interception and an incomplete pass. You are completely excluding the possibility of a touchdown, however. Maybe go back to your AI search engine and try again.You are bad at math and guessing.
Throwing the ball away is always better. Throwing it away stops the play with no risk and results in a turnover on downs at the original line of scrimmage. Throwing an interception gives the defense the ball and allows them to run it out or potentially score.
Why Throwing the Ball Away is Better
- Field Position: The other team gets the ball right where you started the play.
- No Return Risk: A bad pass thrown out of bounds cannot be caught by the other team.
- Safety: It prevents a turnover touchdown or a long return by the defense.
What Happens with an Interception
- Touchback Risk: If caught in the end zone and downed, the defense gets the ball at their own 20-yard line.
- Return Danger: If the defender runs the interception out of the end zone, they can advance the ball or score.
- Wasted Down: You still lose possession either way on 4th down.
You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.Fine I guess I'll respond to your AI slop. Obviously throwing it away is better when the two options are an interception and an incomplete pass. You are completely excluding the possibility of a touchdown, however. Maybe go back to your AI search engine and try again.
You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.
Heck was rushed around the end and a missed block by the RB put him in a panic. He back peddled 10 yards before throwing the ball into a defenders hands.
The only thing dumber than the play he made are your takes on football. Let me guess you coached elementary school football from the bleachers and you were city champ and coach of the year in your mind.
You make me![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Why try for a touchdown when you can play for a chance at a safety?! Genius! Why ever throw a pass again? There's always a chance it could be a pick 6!You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.
Heck was rushed around the end and a missed block by the RB put him in a panic. He back peddled 10 yards before throwing the ball into a defenders hands.
Iowa had an outstanding chance to get a safety and get the ball back with the ball on the 2. JFC you need half a brain to help you think.
The only thing dumber than the play he made are your takes on football. Let me guess you coached elementary school football from the bleachers and you were city champ and coach of the year in your mind.
You make me![]()
![]()
![]()
.
I'm not necessarily advocating for that, but if they're still evaluating, it wouldn't be the worst idea. I'm of the opinion Brown looked a lot more comfortable Saturday and would be fine if they had made their decision. But it's possible they want to see how Hecklinski responds with getting the first series or two right out of the gate. Not saying that's the correct thing to do, but it's something that may happen.
Hearing Hank is taking the majority of 1st team snaps now
Hecklinski will end up being the better option against ISU’s aggressive defense.
Quick decisions and quick release wins the day.
Not sure I agree with the "If you have 2 QBs it means you don't have 1" credo. As someone else mentioned above, we will probably need both at some point this season. I just don't see anything wrong with utilizing both if/when necessary.That’s a very fair position.
But as I said in another thread, what would a different result next Saturday tell us? If Heck is slight better, we are no better off as far as making a decision. If Hank is again better, I suppose that confirms what we saw Saturday, which might be comforting, but now we’ve wasted time giving reps to Heck. If Heck is dramatically better, do we even trust those results? Because we didn’t after Kids Day.
I’m glad both guys were given opportunities up through Saturday, and I defended the coaches decision to do so. But at some point, you’ve got to make a decision and move forward.
At least your post wasn't slanted in favor of either (I'll let you guess which one)I went through the exercise of rewatching all of Brown and Heck's passing/running snaps. I charted each play with some brief notes and assigned a score of +1 positive / 0 neutral / -1 negative. For some added context, there were both completions and incompletions that I would consider 'neutral' plays. Completions where it was a short throw to a schemed up wide open receiver that any middle school QB could hit would be a neutral completion example. For example, Heck's touchdown pass I graded as neutral. Hats off to Lester on those. There were also some incompletions I considered 'neutral', where the QB made the best he could out of a play, or it wasn't a necessarily egregious miss.
Overall my general thoughts were that both quarterbacks were unfortunately even worse than I had initially thought. Both had some positive moments, but also a fair share of bad misses and turnover worthy plays. They were also about as even as can be in positive/neutral/negative plays made. Below is how things shook out:
Total passing plays (plus the one RPO with Heck):
Brown - 23
Heck - 18
Positive / Neutral / Negative plays
Brown - 9 / 6 / 8
Heck - 7 / 5 / 6
Turnover worthy plays
Brown - 2
Heck - 1 (the actual INT, although this was 4th and goal where he threw up for grabs to avoid sack)
One other item to note. On Heck's passing plays, over half (or 9 of 17) came on what would be considered obvious passing downs (2nd and 7 or more, 3rd and 5 or more or 4th down). These are naturally going to be more difficult to convert as the defense is expecting pass. While only 8 of Brown's 23 passing plays came in these obvious passing down situations. They also passed way more on first down with Brown, 13 of his 23 pass plays vs. only 4 of 17 passing on first down for Heck.
Overall it was extremely even between the two in regards to the number of positive plays and negative plays with bad misses and near turnovers. I would like to see more from both before anointing either of them the full time starter. I simply don't believe we've seen enough to know who will be the better option for when we get into Big Ten play and see tougher competition. Gun to my head right now I would lean Heck. Yes he had some absolutely terrible misses (so did Brown), but I like his mobility in the pocket better than Brown, and Brown really scares me with his locking in on wide receivers. More so than the two turnover worthy plays Brown had on Saturday, the more telling miss for me was the miss he had to Diaz on the left side of the field on 3rd and 4 near the end of the first half. NIU basically brought a four man rush that was picked up, but Brown for whatever reason panicked and quickly threw it out to the left on his back foot and without setting his feet. Not a good look, as I've long been a believer that pocket presence is maybe the most important skill for a QB to have. If this is an issue with Brown, it will be magnified when we start to face better defenses.
I don't see the axiom "If you have 2 QB's it means you don't have 1 as being a negative if both QB's are #1 QB caliber and I think that's what we have here. In a way, I'd rather have this scenario than have only 1 starter and then a group of bench warmer caliber back ups.Not sure I agree with the "If you have 2 QBs it means you don't have 1" credo. As someone else mentioned above, we will probably need both at some point this season. I just don't see anything wrong with utilizing both if/when necessary.
Exactly. We appear to have 2 capable QBsI don't see the axiom "If you have 2 QB's it means you don't have 1 as being a negative if both QB's are #1 QB caliber and I think that's what we have here. In a way, I'd rather have this scenario than have only 1 starter and then a group of bench warmer caliber back ups.
I heard it from someone else I trust. But I do think there will still be a rotation. Hank is ahead right now.I saw that too but I don't trust that the person is really an insider
I think its pretty clear that there are a number of people. both posters and media who want Heck, almost no matter what happens, which I don't really get. Sure, gunslinger, kinda reminds some people of Tate, whatever.Overall, I think Leistikow and Tachman do a really good job. I want to say that up front.
But I also think it’s interesting that all summer long, they were beating the drum for the idea of the QB competition stretching into the season. Then, after Kids Day, they pretty clearly became Team Heck, so much so that last week, after Kirk declined to name a starter, they seemed skeptical of the move, with Tachman, in particular, raising the question that in a few weeks, we might be criticizing the coaching staff for mismanaging the QB decision, by not settling on a starter. And now, after Saturday’s game, when most observers are giving the edge to Brown (and there’s data to back it up), they are once again advocating for shared time for the two QBs against ISU. Tachman, specifically, called for Heck to get the start, with the QBs switching after 2-3 series.
I want to acknowledge that there’s probably no clear answer as to how we should proceed at QB. We all have our opinions. But these two sportswriters, who I think usually do an excellent job, are kind of all over the place on this one.
Hawkeye Report Olympics
Play-by-play recap: Iowa 12 Madison College 5 (F/14)
Hawkeye Report Football
Hawkeye Report Podcast with Robert Gallery
Hawkeye Report Football
Game Preview: Northern Iowa at Iowa
Hawkeye Report Football
The Friday Five talking Iowa football
Hawkeye Report Basketball
Ranking every Iowa men's basketball conference game