QB Battle: Jeremy Hecklinski appears to have passed Hank Brown on the Depth Chart. QB was NOT a Transfer Portal Priority per KF on Dec 18

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
3,319
3,267
113
I went through the exercise of rewatching all of Brown and Heck's passing/running snaps. I charted each play with some brief notes and assigned a score of +1 positive / 0 neutral / -1 negative. For some added context, there were both completions and incompletions that I would consider 'neutral' plays. Completions where it was a short throw to a schemed up wide open receiver that any middle school QB could hit would be a neutral completion example. For example, Heck's touchdown pass I graded as neutral. Hats off to Lester on those. There were also some incompletions I considered 'neutral', where the QB made the best he could out of a play, or it wasn't a necessarily egregious miss.

Overall my general thoughts were that both quarterbacks were unfortunately even worse than I had initially thought. Both had some positive moments, but also a fair share of bad misses and turnover worthy plays. They were also about as even as can be in positive/neutral/negative plays made. Below is how things shook out:

Total passing plays (plus the one RPO with Heck):
Brown - 23
Heck - 18

Positive / Neutral / Negative plays
Brown - 9 / 6 / 8
Heck - 7 / 5 / 6

Turnover worthy plays
Brown - 2
Heck - 1 (the actual INT, although this was 4th and goal where he threw up for grabs to avoid sack)

One other item to note. On Heck's passing plays, over half (or 9 of 17) came on what would be considered obvious passing downs (2nd and 7 or more, 3rd and 5 or more or 4th down). These are naturally going to be more difficult to convert as the defense is expecting pass. While only 8 of Brown's 23 passing plays came in these obvious passing down situations. They also passed way more on first down with Brown, 13 of his 23 pass plays vs. only 4 of 17 passing on first down for Heck.

Overall it was extremely even between the two in regards to the number of positive plays and negative plays with bad misses and near turnovers. I would like to see more from both before anointing either of them the full time starter. I simply don't believe we've seen enough to know who will be the better option for when we get into Big Ten play and see tougher competition. Gun to my head right now I would lean Heck. Yes he had some absolutely terrible misses (so did Brown), but I like his mobility in the pocket better than Brown, and Brown really scares me with his locking in on wide receivers. More so than the two turnover worthy plays Brown had on Saturday, the more telling miss for me was the miss he had to Diaz on the left side of the field on 3rd and 4 near the end of the first half. NIU basically brought a four man rush that was picked up, but Brown for whatever reason panicked and quickly threw it out to the left on his back foot and without setting his feet. Not a good look, as I've long been a believer that pocket presence is maybe the most important skill for a QB to have. If this is an issue with Brown, it will be magnified when we start to face better defenses.
Read option is not RPO
 

Oldman74

Sophomore
Dec 24, 2012
69
143
33
You'd rather have 15 yards of field position over a 50/50 ball for a possible TD? Ball on the 20 is still not good field position.
That wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.
 

squeezebox_1

All-Conference
Mar 6, 2018
962
1,423
93
That wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.
It wasn't a good pass, and he missed Diaz for a wide open TD on the drive before. With that said, the Oline needs to be able to punch in a run from 2 yards out with a 1st down. The read option looked great with Heck at QB, and it would be great to explore that more. Maybe Brown wouldn't have taken the INT, but it would have likely been a sack near the 15, so it's basically a wash.
 

pocha444444

Senior
May 16, 2007
236
544
93
That wasn't a 50/50 ball. While he was under pressure, the ball needed to be thrown where only our guy can catch it or it falls incomplete. It's a TD for us, or they take over deep in their own end. That's likely a part of being inexperienced, but those are the decisions that winning teams make.
Yes agree, ball definitely could have been better. I was only arguing that I'd much rather see the ball thrown there vs taking the sack, and I think most coaches (and mathematicians) would agree. He didn't get a good loft on the throw though
 

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
We'll know much more after this week on the QBs. Charged up environment, playing a better team, etc....NIU was so damn bad, it's hard to tell anything.

The Hawks just need to keep growing momentum for the upcoming big 3 game stretch (Michigan, Ohio State, Washington).

And whoever does not win the job has to remember; all it takes is one snap & an injury to QB1 and then your team needs you.

Having 2 good, competent QBs who can run Lester's offense is not a bad thing.
 

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
Full text of the tweet;

Both Iowa quarterbacks said they don't know the plan this weekend vs. Iowa State. Haven't been told.

Hank Brown:
“I don't. My plan is one day at a time, and be where my feet are, and just continue to execute and practice and prepare for what's to come this weekend.”

Jeremy Hecklinski: “I don't know what they're going to do. They haven't said anything to us. I am hopeful that I get an opportunity and I’ll be ready for it.”

Would they like to know?

Hecklinski said this:
“If it were up to me, I don't know if I would want to know. I think I would just rather prepare like I'm the starter, and then they pick whoever they pick.”

 

doughuddl2_rivals

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2009
1,201
1,768
113
You'd rather have 15 yards of field position over a 50/50 ball for a possible TD? Ball on the 20 is still not good field position.
You'd chance a pick 6, or a larger chuck of yardage considering how close the throw was to the line of scrimmage?

Plus there is a geater chance for a safety at the 2 and getting the ball back.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: pocha444444

doughuddl2_rivals

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2009
1,201
1,768
113
Yes agree, ball definitely could have been better. I was only arguing that I'd much rather see the ball thrown there vs taking the sack, and I think most coaches (and mathematicians) would agree. He didn't get a good loft on the throw though
You are bad at math and guessing.

Throwing the ball away is always better. Throwing it away stops the play with no risk and results in a turnover on downs at the original line of scrimmage. Throwing an interception gives the defense the ball and allows them to run it out or potentially score.

Why Throwing the Ball Away is Better
    • Field Position: The other team gets the ball right where you started the play.
    • No Return Risk: A bad pass thrown out of bounds cannot be caught by the other team.
    • Safety: It prevents a turnover touchdown or a long return by the defense.

What Happens with an Interception
    • Touchback Risk: If caught in the end zone and downed, the defense gets the ball at their own 20-yard line.
    • Return Danger: If the defender runs the interception out of the end zone, they can advance the ball or score.
    • Wasted Down: You still lose possession either way on 4th down.
 

pocha444444

Senior
May 16, 2007
236
544
93
You are bad at math and guessing.

Throwing the ball away is always better. Throwing it away stops the play with no risk and results in a turnover on downs at the original line of scrimmage. Throwing an interception gives the defense the ball and allows them to run it out or potentially score.

Why Throwing the Ball Away is Better
    • Field Position: The other team gets the ball right where you started the play.
    • No Return Risk: A bad pass thrown out of bounds cannot be caught by the other team.
    • Safety: It prevents a turnover touchdown or a long return by the defense.

What Happens with an Interception
    • Touchback Risk: If caught in the end zone and downed, the defense gets the ball at their own 20-yard line.
    • Return Danger: If the defender runs the interception out of the end zone, they can advance the ball or score.
    • Wasted Down: You still lose possession either way on 4th down.
Lol did you really just copy/paste some AI bs for your response?
 

pocha444444

Senior
May 16, 2007
236
544
93
You are bad at math and guessing.

Throwing the ball away is always better. Throwing it away stops the play with no risk and results in a turnover on downs at the original line of scrimmage. Throwing an interception gives the defense the ball and allows them to run it out or potentially score.

Why Throwing the Ball Away is Better
    • Field Position: The other team gets the ball right where you started the play.
    • No Return Risk: A bad pass thrown out of bounds cannot be caught by the other team.
    • Safety: It prevents a turnover touchdown or a long return by the defense.

What Happens with an Interception
    • Touchback Risk: If caught in the end zone and downed, the defense gets the ball at their own 20-yard line.
    • Return Danger: If the defender runs the interception out of the end zone, they can advance the ball or score.
    • Wasted Down: You still lose possession either way on 4th down.
Fine I guess I'll respond to your AI slop. Obviously throwing it away is better when the two options are an interception and an incomplete pass. You are completely excluding the possibility of a touchdown, however. Maybe go back to your AI search engine and try again.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: doughuddl2_rivals

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
full text of tweet:

Reece Vander Zee on Iowa's offense:

"I think we played well, but there's a lot to improve on. I think we missed on a bunch of shots that we could've completed and came down with, me included. So I think just continuing to rep those, continuing to rep those plays down by the goal line. It's a hard thing to execute when you're in the red zone, so we've got to know that. I think there's a lot of room for improvement."

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kceasthawk@77

doughuddl2_rivals

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2009
1,201
1,768
113
Fine I guess I'll respond to your AI slop. Obviously throwing it away is better when the two options are an interception and an incomplete pass. You are completely excluding the possibility of a touchdown, however. Maybe go back to your AI search engine and try again.
You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.

Heck was rushed around the end and a missed block by the RB put him in a panic. He back peddled 10 yards before throwing the ball into a defenders hands.

Iowa had an outstanding chance to get a safety and get the ball back with the ball on the 2. JFC you need half a brain to help you think.

The only thing dumber than the play he made are your takes on football. Let me guess you coached elementary school football from the bleachers and you were city champ and coach of the year in your mind.

You make me 😆 🤣 😂 😹 .
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: pocha444444

pocha444444

Senior
May 16, 2007
236
544
93
You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.

Heck was rushed around the end and a missed block by the RB put him in a panic. He back peddled 10 yards before throwing the ball into a defenders hands.

The only thing dumber than the play he made are your takes on football. Let me guess you coached elementary school football from the bleachers and you were city champ and coach of the year in your mind.

You make me 😆 🤣 😂 😹 .
 

pocha444444

Senior
May 16, 2007
236
544
93
You don't need to reply, your posts are slop that i won't read anymore.

Heck was rushed around the end and a missed block by the RB put him in a panic. He back peddled 10 yards before throwing the ball into a defenders hands.

Iowa had an outstanding chance to get a safety and get the ball back with the ball on the 2. JFC you need half a brain to help you think.

The only thing dumber than the play he made are your takes on football. Let me guess you coached elementary school football from the bleachers and you were city champ and coach of the year in your mind.

You make me 😆 🤣 😂 😹 .
Why try for a touchdown when you can play for a chance at a safety?! Genius! Why ever throw a pass again? There's always a chance it could be a pick 6!

Your takes have given me a good laugh, and so I thank you. I must move on now. Try not to be scared of your shadow if you decide to venture outside today.
 

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
I'm not necessarily advocating for that, but if they're still evaluating, it wouldn't be the worst idea. I'm of the opinion Brown looked a lot more comfortable Saturday and would be fine if they had made their decision. But it's possible they want to see how Hecklinski responds with getting the first series or two right out of the gate. Not saying that's the correct thing to do, but it's something that may happen.

crazy that as of yesterday neither Jeremy nor Hank knew who was starting
 

squeezebox_1

All-Conference
Mar 6, 2018
962
1,423
93
Man this video gives some great views, just a run over of the first half.

Brown:
6:15, rvz open on the deep shot, the check-down worked
7:11 really need to hit Howard on that shot.
7:57 great pass, great route, James was open as well
18:14 great pass, happy he didn't target the check down in Ostrenga
18:34 can't fault the pass, but wow was Buie open in the under route
20:27 Good lord you need to hit James on that route, 1 on 1 with the safety pulled to the other side of the field
20:44 another 1 on 1 with James, hit the deep shot
23:30 great pass
25:04 that sun was vicious, needs to put just a little more touch on this throw
25:35 hit the check down, should have been a pick (maybe not enough time, took a shot)


Heck has accuracy issues, but his reads look decent
9:13 stepped up in the pocket, if he hits that pass it goes for 20
10:35 probably the best pass of the day, took a hit and delivered to the only open route
12:45 Diaz pass, should have been delivered a bit better, sun in Diaz's eyes, but that's 6 (Brown probably hits RVZ and wow was he open as well)
14:23 DJ needs to pull that down
15:37 the correct throw in a 1 on 1 with Diaz
17:09 TD either direction, great play call with all of the focus on Diaz
30:43 Honestly, this is the difference between these two, Heck let the play develop and took the chunk play over the drop off to Howard.



 
Last edited:

squeezebox_1

All-Conference
Mar 6, 2018
962
1,423
93
I have to admit, the more that I watch the film, the more impressed I am with Hecklinski. His shortfall is accuracy, but that may or may not be a rhythm issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
From last night's Hawk Talk with Gary Dolphin:

KF maintains that the QB battle between Hank and Heck has been really healthy

Says that the QB room, including Jimmy Sullivan, Tradon Bessinger and Ryan Fitzgerald, as a whole, has done a great job.

Said that he thought both Brown and Hecklinski both did some good things against NIU. Thought that operationally things went well despite the change from Brown to Hecklinski.

Other than one cadence issue that resulted in a false start, Ferentz is happy with how it went in its totality.

"Credit to both of them, they both prepared well for the game."
 
  • Like
Reactions: doughuddl2_rivals

AnonymousNolonger

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
1,038
2,118
113
Hecklinski will end up being the better option against ISU’s aggressive defense.

Quick decisions and quick release wins the day.
 

Franisdaman

Heisman
Nov 3, 2012
17,177
26,533
113
Hecklinski will end up being the better option against ISU’s aggressive defense.

Quick decisions and quick release wins the day.

I kinda wish they'd do the opposite of last week; so this time, start Jeremy. See how he does. And then evaluate both QBs from both weeks, where each got a start.
 
Aug 14, 2025
284
428
63
That’s a very fair position.

But as I said in another thread, what would a different result next Saturday tell us? If Heck is slight better, we are no better off as far as making a decision. If Hank is again better, I suppose that confirms what we saw Saturday, which might be comforting, but now we’ve wasted time giving reps to Heck. If Heck is dramatically better, do we even trust those results? Because we didn’t after Kids Day.

I’m glad both guys were given opportunities up through Saturday, and I defended the coaches decision to do so. But at some point, you’ve got to make a decision and move forward.
Not sure I agree with the "If you have 2 QBs it means you don't have 1" credo. As someone else mentioned above, we will probably need both at some point this season. I just don't see anything wrong with utilizing both if/when necessary.
 
Aug 14, 2025
284
428
63
B
I went through the exercise of rewatching all of Brown and Heck's passing/running snaps. I charted each play with some brief notes and assigned a score of +1 positive / 0 neutral / -1 negative. For some added context, there were both completions and incompletions that I would consider 'neutral' plays. Completions where it was a short throw to a schemed up wide open receiver that any middle school QB could hit would be a neutral completion example. For example, Heck's touchdown pass I graded as neutral. Hats off to Lester on those. There were also some incompletions I considered 'neutral', where the QB made the best he could out of a play, or it wasn't a necessarily egregious miss.

Overall my general thoughts were that both quarterbacks were unfortunately even worse than I had initially thought. Both had some positive moments, but also a fair share of bad misses and turnover worthy plays. They were also about as even as can be in positive/neutral/negative plays made. Below is how things shook out:

Total passing plays (plus the one RPO with Heck):
Brown - 23
Heck - 18

Positive / Neutral / Negative plays
Brown - 9 / 6 / 8
Heck - 7 / 5 / 6

Turnover worthy plays
Brown - 2
Heck - 1 (the actual INT, although this was 4th and goal where he threw up for grabs to avoid sack)

One other item to note. On Heck's passing plays, over half (or 9 of 17) came on what would be considered obvious passing downs (2nd and 7 or more, 3rd and 5 or more or 4th down). These are naturally going to be more difficult to convert as the defense is expecting pass. While only 8 of Brown's 23 passing plays came in these obvious passing down situations. They also passed way more on first down with Brown, 13 of his 23 pass plays vs. only 4 of 17 passing on first down for Heck.

Overall it was extremely even between the two in regards to the number of positive plays and negative plays with bad misses and near turnovers. I would like to see more from both before anointing either of them the full time starter. I simply don't believe we've seen enough to know who will be the better option for when we get into Big Ten play and see tougher competition. Gun to my head right now I would lean Heck. Yes he had some absolutely terrible misses (so did Brown), but I like his mobility in the pocket better than Brown, and Brown really scares me with his locking in on wide receivers. More so than the two turnover worthy plays Brown had on Saturday, the more telling miss for me was the miss he had to Diaz on the left side of the field on 3rd and 4 near the end of the first half. NIU basically brought a four man rush that was picked up, but Brown for whatever reason panicked and quickly threw it out to the left on his back foot and without setting his feet. Not a good look, as I've long been a believer that pocket presence is maybe the most important skill for a QB to have. If this is an issue with Brown, it will be magnified when we start to face better defenses.
At least your post wasn't slanted in favor of either (I'll let you guess which one)
 

yrunvs

Senior
Feb 18, 2012
244
430
63
Not sure I agree with the "If you have 2 QBs it means you don't have 1" credo. As someone else mentioned above, we will probably need both at some point this season. I just don't see anything wrong with utilizing both if/when necessary.
I don't see the axiom "If you have 2 QB's it means you don't have 1 as being a negative if both QB's are #1 QB caliber and I think that's what we have here. In a way, I'd rather have this scenario than have only 1 starter and then a group of bench warmer caliber back ups.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-American
Feb 2, 2005
3,932
7,011
113
Overall, I think Leistikow and Tachman do a really good job. I want to say that up front.

But I also think it’s interesting that all summer long, they were beating the drum for the idea of the QB competition stretching into the season. Then, after Kids Day, they pretty clearly became Team Heck, so much so that last week, after Kirk declined to name a starter, they seemed skeptical of the move, with Tachman, in particular, raising the question that in a few weeks, we might be criticizing the coaching staff for mismanaging the QB decision, by not settling on a starter. And now, after Saturday’s game, when most observers are giving the edge to Brown (and there’s data to back it up), they are once again advocating for shared time for the two QBs against ISU. Tachman, specifically, called for Heck to get the start, with the QBs switching after 2-3 series.

I want to acknowledge that there’s probably no clear answer as to how we should proceed at QB. We all have our opinions. But these two sportswriters, who I think usually do an excellent job, are kind of all over the place on this one.
I think its pretty clear that there are a number of people. both posters and media who want Heck, almost no matter what happens, which I don't really get. Sure, gunslinger, kinda reminds some people of Tate, whatever.
 
Hawkeye Report

Latest

  1. 01 Hawkeye Report Olympics Play-by-play recap: Iowa 12 Madison College 5 (F/14)
  2. 02 Hawkeye Report Football Hawkeye Report Podcast with Robert Gallery
  3. 03 Hawkeye Report Football Game Preview: Northern Iowa at Iowa
  4. 04 Hawkeye Report Football The Friday Five talking Iowa football
  5. 05 Hawkeye Report Basketball Ranking every Iowa men's basketball conference game