Fan attendance (USC Trojans yesterday)

DannyTree1

Sophomore
Jun 4, 2026
284
127
43
I watched WLTX last night and Reggie Anderson had video from SC State's home game. I was shocked at the empty spots in the stadium.

SC state had a great year last year and they have a popular head coach.

They announced 12,000 fans. The stadium seats 22,000

If I was an SC State fan, alum, or even someone in their athletic department, I would be disappointed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IPOC

Lurker123

All-American
May 4, 2020
6,641
5,525
113
This will continue now that teams are no longer "teams" , but rather paid mercenaries.
College football is in serious trouble.


View attachment 1412927


That is terrible. That is beyond terrible. We get 6, maybe 7 home games a year.

Then again, im one of those that has moved on the TV and cooking out during games.
 

SouthernBelly

Senior
Sep 16, 2024
814
635
93
In So Cal's case they have long not come close to filling up the stadium. Maybe this is worse than usual but it's not exactly new.

In general the in person experience has been on the decline in many respects for a while. Ron Morris had an article in response to something Spurrier said once about wishing the fans would not disappear so quickly. It was a noon kickoff in September and they played UAB or someone small like that and actually took care of business. The place was practically empty by the end. Morris' point was TV times dictate the kickoffs and who really wants to watch a game where the outcome is decided in 90 plus degree heat by the time you're in the second half. I didn't think he was wrong.

TV times still and probably always will dictate when games are played since all of it is always on TV now, that can bring an inconvenience. Ticket prices are insane. Crowds are generally troublesome anymore. Concession prices are stupid high for what you get. Metal bleachers with no leg room absolutely suck.

I still prefer the thought of watching a game in person verses the TV but the exercise of it, not so much. Clearly some of this is because I am becoming a geezer but some of it is because it's financially not worth the time and energy.
 

Uscg1984

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2006
2,583
3,393
113
This will be a continuing trend, I think. The powers that be in college football are focused on turning it into a product that appeals more to television audiences around the country and less to die-hard fans who would drive to, and fill up, a stadium 6 or 7 times a year. And when die-hard fans experiment with not going to a game once in a while, they usually find that it gets easier and easier to think of reasons to save their time and money. Meanwhile, the athletic departments aren't giving them a lot of reasons to come back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrestonyteParrot

PrestonyteParrot

All-Conference
May 28, 2024
3,028
3,014
113
This will be a continuing trend, I think. The powers that be in college football are focused on turning it into a product that appeals more to television audiences around the country and less to die-hard fans who would drive to, and fill up, a stadium 6 or 7 times a year. And when die-hard fans experiment with not going to a game once in a while, they usually find that it gets easier and easier to think of reasons to save their time and money. Meanwhile, the athletic departments aren't giving them a lot of reasons to come back.
Gathering with old friends and college buddies you rarely saw otherwise is/was the primary reason for these fall get togethers but as the "team aspect'' disappears from college athletics so does the comradery of following the team live at the stadium. College athletics is dying a slow death!
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,442
3,047
113
This will be a continuing trend, I think. The powers that be in college football are focused on turning it into a product that appeals more to television audiences around the country and less to die-hard fans who would drive to, and fill up, a stadium 6 or 7 times a year. And when die-hard fans experiment with not going to a game once in a while, they usually find that it gets easier and easier to think of reasons to save their time and money. Meanwhile, the athletic departments aren't giving them a lot of reasons to come back.
College football is following in NASCAR's footsteps. First, they made the cost to attend much higher than it historically had been (the cost for everything associated with going to a game has skyrocketed in the past 20 years). Then, they changed the fundamental basics of the sport from what made the fans passionate into something the fans didn't want and never asked for (paid players with no loyalty to the school, only to the paycheck). When fans lose interest in actually attending an event in person, their overall interest fades as well.
 

Uscg1984

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2006
2,583
3,393
113
Official attendance was 51,000. I believe that stadium used to hold over 100,000.
I think for USC games, they tarp off the far end of the coliseum, giving them a full attendance of around 77,000. I'd love to know where they got the 51,000 figure. Perhaps they sold/gave away that many total tickets, but there's no way half that many actually showed up for the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I4CtheFuture

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,442
3,047
113
Official attendance was 51,000. I believe that stadium used to hold over 100,000.
Usually, "official attendance" counts tickets sold, not how many people came through the turnstiles. I've seen a lot of games at WB where there were many, many thousands of empty seats and the official attendance number showed a near sellout.
 

JohnnySolo

Senior
May 6, 2011
575
443
63
They should take all tickets sold and subtract unsold tickets on ticketmaster to get a better number. But why would they do that? We live in a world of lies and misrepresentation. Not to mention misinformation.
 

KingWard

All-American
Feb 15, 2022
8,485
8,685
113
That is terrible. That is beyond terrible. We get 6, maybe 7 home games a year.

Then again, im one of those that has moved on the TV and cooking out during games.
They gave up Notre Dame to play these guys. Maybe it's a backlash. If so, it's an impressive backlash. "Pathetic" doesn't begin to cover a crowd that small for the home opener of a legacy program seen as a contender for the CFP. Tickles me, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

Bubba Fett

Joined Oct 6, 2000
Feb 1, 2022
2,149
2,112
113
Who wants to go anymore? Prices are outrageous. Most schools could not care less about how many people attend.
 

Bubba Fett

Joined Oct 6, 2000
Feb 1, 2022
2,149
2,112
113
College football is following in NASCAR's footsteps. First, they made the cost to attend much higher than it historically had been (the cost for everything associated with going to a game has skyrocketed in the past 20 years). Then, they changed the fundamental basics of the sport from what made the fans passionate into something the fans didn't want and never asked for (paid players with no loyalty to the school, only to the paycheck). When fans lose interest in actually attending an event in person, their overall interest fades as well.
^^^This.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,442
3,047
113
Who wants to go anymore? Prices are outrageous. Most schools could not care less about how many people attend.
Don't kid yourself. They care deeply about how many people attend. People who do not attend, do not buy tickets or donate to the program or an NIL collective. There are only so many super wealthy alumni and fans who are willing to shell out tens of thousands for luxury boxes. The real money comes from the tens of thousands of regular fans who buy tickets and make donations for the privilege of buying those tickets.

I'll say it again. When the attendance in stadiums drops, the interest in the games on tv drops along with it. When the tv viewership drops, the tv money to the conferences drops.
 

KingWard

All-American
Feb 15, 2022
8,485
8,685
113
College football is following in NASCAR's footsteps. First, they made the cost to attend much higher than it historically had been (the cost for everything associated with going to a game has skyrocketed in the past 20 years). Then, they changed the fundamental basics of the sport from what made the fans passionate into something the fans didn't want and never asked for (paid players with no loyalty to the school, only to the paycheck). When fans lose interest in actually attending an event in person, their overall interest fades as well.
I think that, in time, we will see a lot of validity in those observations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bubba Fett

Bubba Fett

Joined Oct 6, 2000
Feb 1, 2022
2,149
2,112
113
Don't kid yourself. They care deeply about how many people attend. People who do not attend, do not buy tickets or donate to the program or an NIL collective. There are only so many super wealthy alumni and fans who are willing to shell out tens of thousands for luxury boxes. The real money comes from the tens of thousands of regular fans who buy tickets and make donations for the privilege of buying those tickets.

I'll say it again. When the attendance in stadiums drops, the interest in the games on tv drops along with it. When the tv viewership drops, the tv money to the conferences drops.
I'm merely agreeing with your previous post. If they really cared, they wouldn't be following the NASCAR path.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tngamecock

Forkcock

All-Conference
Feb 11, 2006
1,737
1,845
113
Don't kid yourself. They care deeply about how many people attend. People who do not attend, do not buy tickets or donate to the program or an NIL collective. There are only so many super wealthy alumni and fans who are willing to shell out tens of thousands for luxury boxes. The real money comes from the tens of thousands of regular fans who buy tickets and make donations for the privilege of buying those tickets.

I'll say it again. When the attendance in stadiums drops, the interest in the games on tv drops along with it. When the tv viewership drops, the tv money to the conferences drops.

I've said it many times, these entitled athletes are destroying the thing they need the most. What we're seeing is unsustainable.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,442
3,047
113
I've said it many times, these entitled athletes are destroying the thing they need the most. What we're seeing is unsustainable.

The vast majority of college football players are not smart people to start with. Add to that fact they have families and "advisors" who are not smart people either giving them advice on what they should do, and you have the perfect recipe for a group destroying the thing they need the most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forkcock

DannyTree1

Sophomore
Jun 4, 2026
284
127
43
it's going to be extremely hot Saturday. With the "feels like" temp, it could be one of the hottest games in recent memory.

Going to be lots of people passing out and being transported to the hospital via ambulance. I saw a handful last year at one of the early season games myself.

My son was in the band the last few years and those early season, hot games, are very, very tough.

Going to be lots of sick drunks too.

I hope to watch at least some of the game from home, but more likely to catch some of it on the radio.
 
GamecockCentral

Latest

  1. 01 GamecockCentral Football Wes' Big South Carolina Season Preview Part 1: The key variables that will determine the season
  2. 02 GamecockCentral Football In Stewart's absence, an opportunity arises for others in South Carolina's EDGE room
  3. 03 GamecockCentral Football With two days until South Carolina football kicks off 2026, a look back at No. 2 Sterling Sharpe
  4. 04 GamecockCentral Football ⌛Time is running out! 75% off GamecockCentral for the year!
  5. 05 GamecockCentral Football Williams-Brice Reimagined refreshes South Carolina game days for 2026 and beyond