Haven’t looked at the stats yet, but gdamn you love your trannies, don’t you
Trans violence
- Thread starter JohnHughsPartner
- Start date
haven't looked at any data, but think it's awesome me and my trans horny bros are more worried about the fly buzzing than the nuke that just went off. this $h!t writes itself.Haven’t looked at the stats yet, but gdamn you love your trannies, don’t you
plain English: I honestly couldn't give two tiny f.vcks about trannies, and you shouldn't either. it's the entire gd point.
Soon enough you'll be stabbed to death by a trans person.Haven’t looked at the stats yet, but gdamn you love your trannies, don’t you
Females and males?
You dip your stick to check your gender fluid every 3000 miles?
Sorry about that "gender fluid" 3000 miles comment earlier.
With these modern trannies it's all synthetics that can go for decades.
Unfortunately this isn’t the only one……& the numbers are growing rapidly.
As I’ve already linked in another thread, in 2024 trans were at least 12x more likely per capita to commit non-gang related mass shootings than non-trannies.
But of course to morons like Lil Ghee....
“nothing to see here!”
I don't mean to get in between whatever it is you and ghee has going on, but...
Your CPRC's "12×" is a 1-year estimate based on 3 of 25 FBI-defined active-shooter incidents in 2024. It's not a general measure of violence. Like I pointed out the last time this came up, CPRC itself says one of those classifications is debatable; remove it and the headline rests on two cases. Over the full 2018–2024 period it is 7 cases out of 284 (6 if you remove the case CPRC itself calls debatable) and its broader dataset puts the figure closer to 2x. Sure the rates matter (sorry ghee) but 2 or 3 cases in one year doesn't prove a growing threat from an entire population.
But this is where ghee's point about absolute numbers comes to play. Using the GVA's mass-shooting definition, his FactCheck.org claim reported 5,748 incidents from Jan 2013-Sep 2025, with 5 confirmed transgender/nonbinary shooters. Dude, that's <0.1%.
To the other thread, a man murdering 8 members of his own family is a frack'n horrific and worth discussing on its own terms, right? If we're concerned about victims and public safety, we should apply that concern consistently...not select cases primarily because of the offender's identity.
And no, this is not me "defending trannies". I'm just saying the numbers should be read honestly. Outrage algorithms push the most emotionally charged, identity-driven cases because they get clicks. If you keep your attention locked on a tiny slice of the problem you will lose sight of where most violence is actually coming from...and what might actually reduce it.
As I’ve shown in other thread, the FactCheck.org stats are completely irrelevant because they include gang violence which isn’t part of this discussion. Nice try though!
Percentages matter when the number of trans individuals is growing rapidly. These dudes used to be considered mentally ill & were told to get help. Now the libtards are trying to normalize this by allowing them in women’s restrooms/sporting events & even transitioning kids behind their parents backs.
If the number of them continues to grow at this rate (without getting them the appropriate mental help), this problem will get much worse. Guess it’s always an option to keep your head in the sand though!
Alaska, that isn't a legitimate source with actual statistics. That aside, one man raping or sexually assaulting a girl in a female bathroom/locker room while claiming to be a trans woman is one too many to allow this post modernist social experiment to continue. We crossed that Rubicon a long, long time ago.
The nonsense has to end. Full stop.
I agree one rape or sexual assault is one too many. That is not the point I was disputing and CPRC's active-shooter analysis doesn't measure sexual assault anyway.
My point was pretty specific considering PedMaller has only produced a single source in any of his arguements...a 12x headline built around 3 disputed classifications in a single year.
And calling FactCheck "not a legitimate source" doesnt address the number cited either. It reported GVA data: 5,748 mass-shooting incidents from 2013-Sep 2025 and only 5 confirmed transgender shooters. You cannot treat a narrow 3-case 2024 finding as proof of a broad claim about violence or sexual crime.
Personally, I think this nonesense of teachers and preachers sexually assaulting minors has to end. Full stop. (I'm more concerned about floods than drips, you know?)
Well, thanks for at least not calling me a libtard...it's a start.As I’ve shown in other thread, the FactCheck.org stats are completely irrelevant because they include gang violence which isn’t part of this discussion. Nice try though!
Percentages matter when the number of trans individuals is growing rapidly. These dudes used to be considered mentally ill & were told to get help. Now the libtards are trying to normalize this by allowing them in women’s restrooms/sporting events & even transitioning kids behind their parents backs.
If the number of them continues to grow at this rate (without getting them the appropriate mental help), this problem will get much worse. Guess it’s always an option to keep your head in the sand though!
And no, my head isn't in the sand. I'm just taking the emotion out of the discussion and looking at what the numbers actually say.Ghee's FactCheck/GVA number isn't irrelevant because it includes gang violence. It's a different dataset measuring a broader question, and I continued using it for context (of the bigger issue I see)...not as a rebuttal to CPRC's active-shooter analysis. It shows transgender/nonbinary perpetrators account for a very small fraction of the overall mass-shooting problem. See the correlation?
Now, if you want to argue bathrooms, sports, treatment of minors, or sexual offending, I'm all in, but that's not what this discussion has been about in this thread. My point is really about proportionality. In the military, we're taught to distinguish between identifying a real threat and allowing that threat to consume resources or attention disproportionate to its actual significance. IMO, that's what's happening here. A real issue has been magnified by algorithms and political/media narratives to the point it's completely hijacked the MAGAs focus, keeping them from the much larger problems we actually need to address. Foreign policy, infrasstructer, national debt, etc. are MUCH bigger issues than what <1% of the population does. How can you not "see" that?
Last edited:
In simpler term, PedoMaller is a f.vcking MAGA pawn who can't think for himself. whatever the algorithm says is god's truth.Well, thanks for at least not calling me a libtard...it's a start.
Ghee's FactCheck/GVA number isn't irrelevant because it includes gang violence. It's a different dataset measuring a broader question, and I continued using it for context (of the bigger issue I see)...not as a rebuttal to CPRC's active-shooter analysis. It shows transgender/nonbinary perpetrators account for a very small fraction of the overall mass-shooting problem. See the correlation?
Now, if you want to argue bathrooms, sports, treatment of minors, or sexual offending, I'm all in, but that's not what this discussion has been about in this thread. My point is really about proportionality. In the military, we're taught to distinguish between identifying a real threat and allowing that threat to consume resources or attention disproportionate to its actual significance. IMO, that's what's happening here. A real issue has been magnified by algorithms and political/media narratives to the point it's completely hijacked the MAGAs focus, keeping them from the much larger problems we actually need to address. Foreign policy, infrasstructer, national debt, etc. are MUCH bigger issues than what <1% of the population does. How can you no "see" that?
You’re more of a libturdWell, thanks for at least not calling me a libtard...it's a start.
Ghee's FactCheck/GVA number isn't irrelevant because it includes gang violence. It's a different dataset measuring a broader question, and I continued using it for context (of the bigger issue I see)...not as a rebuttal to CPRC's active-shooter analysis. It shows transgender/nonbinary perpetrators account for a very small fraction of the overall mass-shooting problem. See the correlation?
Now, if you want to argue bathrooms, sports, treatment of minors, or sexual offending, I'm all in, but that's not what this discussion has been about in this thread. My point is really about proportionality. In the military, we're taught to distinguish between identifying a real threat and allowing that threat to consume resources or attention disproportionate to its actual significance. IMO, that's what's happening here. A real issue has been magnified by algorithms and political/media narratives to the point it's completely hijacked the MAGAs focus, keeping them from the much larger problems we actually need to address. Foreign policy, infrasstructer, national debt, etc. are MUCH bigger issues than what <1% of the population does. How can you no "see" that?
But a reasonable one
I'm a military veteran, gun-owning 2A supporter, personally conservative Christ follower and politically independent. If that makes me a "libturd," then apparently we've moved the goalposts on what the left looks like.
FWIW, I'm not trying to be left or right. I'm trying to be intellectually consistent. Sometimes that means agreeing with the right, sometimes the left, and occasionally telling both sides they're full of crap.
“I'm a military veteran, gun-owning 2A supporter, personally conservative Christ follower”I'm a military veteran, gun-owning 2A supporter, personally conservative Christ follower and politically independent. If that makes me a "libturd," then apparently we've moved the goalposts on what the left looks like.
FWIW, I'm not trying to be left or right. I'm trying to be intellectually consistent. Sometimes that means agreeing with the right, sometimes the left, and occasionally telling both sides they're full of crap.
Love that
Thank you for your service .
You’ve moved to my non phaggot list . Congrats
You see, this 1% as you say, is so easily recognizable. You yourself say they suffer from mental health. Shouldn’t we be trying to then get them help instead of avoiding/catering to them because they only make up 1% of the population?
I haven’t read much on the guy that killed his family, did he have obvious mental health issues that you avoided because he was only one of billions Americans?
I get a kick out of you guys saying they are such a small percentage of people but yet you can’t help but defend them and/or cater to them and their needs because they are a small percentage. How about the left removes their heads from their butts and tell them they need help like the right has been saying. Is the left that hard up for political votes?
Such a tiny percentage yet he can’t help but defend them with all he’s got. Makes one wonder why he doesn’t want that small percentage to get the help they desperately need.You're such a gd idiot. it was 16x and it could be 100x, but if the total population is <1% it's f.vcking irrelevant. You wouldn't even be allowed to take statistics...they'd laugh you out of the room.
a population that's roughly 1% of the country can be 16x overrepresented in some tiny subset of crimes and still represent a tiny fraction of the ACTUAL gd perpetrators. The multiplier sounds scary big to tiny brains because you're multiplying a tiny base.
Like I said in the other thread about a mass murder of a family you seem to care less about, there were 17 mass murders in the US so far in 2026. ZERO confirmed transgender perpetrators. And according to FactCheck.org only FIVE confirmed transgender/nonbinary perpetrators among 5,748 mass shootings from 2013–2025.
So yeah, 16x sounds scary. how about you tell us how many actual people that represents. That's the number you keep conveniently leaving out. Raw numbers matter, PedoMaller. That's Statistics 101.
we are suggesting they get help. they should see doctors and decide treatment in consultation with their doctors/family
some of you don't seem to understand (or want to acknowledge) that the accepted approach by the medical community consists of treatements other than simply telling them to stop or asking what kind of genitals they have. the treatment can - and sometimes does - include surgery or other treatments that help that person transition.
So an “educated person” which you all claim are democrats, are the ones “treating” these patients. Is that correct? The same party that supports a male becoming a female.
I’m almost certain that a person wanting to have a sex change would get a different answer from doctor to doctor. All you have to do is find the one that will do the surgery for you
If you need a comparison, look at the NCAA where they make a ruling and all one has to do is find the right judge that will overrule it. Heck you can have a judge overrule another judge.
this is my fault for expecting anything other than idiotic drivel from you.
Haha, you can’t even come up with a response. I hope I didn’t just ruin your weekend.
Latest
-
01
Tiger Illustrated
Friday Evening Clemson Football Insider
-
02
Tiger Illustrated
Friday Clemson Football Insider
-
03
Tiger Illustrated
The real story of this offseason in Clemson
-
04
Tiger Illustrated
Thursday Evening Clemson Football Nuggets: Development on the O-line, snap distribution at TE - WR for LSU + punting
-
05
On3
ACC passes rule prohibiting former professional athletes from returning