U.S. Debt Hits $40 Trillion

dawgman42

All-American
Jul 24, 2007
6,196
6,213
113
 

DoggieDaddy13

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2017
3,818
2,171
113
You know that only matters when a democrat is in office

You got a crack a few eggs to make the Great American Omlette Again!

It's just money we owe ourselves. So we buy it back, right....?

Let our grandchildren figure out how to pay it off.

or not.
 
Last edited:

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,693
6,504
113
The exponential increase this century is difficult to actually comprehend. It is just that large.

That also tracks almost exactly with my adulthood, interestingly enough. Since I have been an adult, it has felt like we have been hemorrhaging from increasing debt, and proposed fixes are effectively like 'here, put this used bandaid on that missing limb'.

 

BoDawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2010
5,652
3,248
113
That chart looks absolutely horrifying until it's compared in context to the increase in net national wealth (which people almost never do).

That's why 'merica can keep on 'mericaning into the wee hours of the morning. Foreign central banks are watching as US collateral rises with its debt obligation, you know, a lot like when you apply for a loan and the bank asks you to list your assets. As your assets increase, the banks give you more money.

Yes, federal debt has been increasing more 'proportionally'. No, net sovereign debt hasn't outpaced net national wealth dollar for dollar. The Gini coefficient increased by 0.026, or about 5.6% from the year 2000 to 2024. So the rich have gotten richer. But overall the context isn't nearly as scary when you factor in an economy that is as innovative as ours.

And there's an additional wrinkle: the Fed's national-wealth calculation excludes government land and other nonproduced government assets, so it isn't literally an appraisal of every economically valuable asset owned by the country.
 

Attachments

  • nationaldebt.jpg
    nationaldebt.jpg
    61.5 KB · Views: 6

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,693
6,504
113
It’s getting about that time for us to mint some $10 trillion coins.
Hand out a couple of those two the holders of our debt, and walk away.


Joking…but not…but yeah, I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jethreauxdawg

Pars

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2015
1,665
2,429
113
Trump spends money like a drunken sailor and no one cares anymore about the debt. They just kick the can down the road. The interest on it is astronomical now.
At least we ain’t got no trans athletes practicing sharia law , passing out abortions on every street corner like we did under Joe Byron
 

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,754
13,898
113
This was over a year ago, but if you watch it you’ll understand the situation better than 90+% of congress (which is a problem).

 

Choctaw Dawg

Junior
May 21, 2017
567
261
43
Until Medicare, Medicaid, and social security see reforms this number is only going to skyrocket more than it is. Of course, most Congressmen want to keep their jobs so that isn't happening anytime soon. It is either that or everything burns to the ground very slowly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DesotoCountyDawg

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,754
13,898
113
Until Medicare, Medicaid, and social security see reforms this number is only going to skyrocket more than it is. Of course, most Congressmen want to keep their jobs so that isn't happening anytime soon. It is either that or everything burns to the ground very slowly.

I don’t think there’s any hope of changing the spiral. It’s just a matter of how and how slowly the devastation will play out.

Maybe AI will save us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

grinningmule

Heisman
Jul 15, 2021
5,035
18,293
113
The debt has become laughable. No President in a long time has had the balls to veto spending bills. Bush wanted to partially privatize SS contributions and got crucified for it. The sad truth is the takers are growing and the makers are shrinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darryl Steight

horshack.sixpack

All-American
Oct 30, 2012
11,934
9,052
113
Then we just use our military.... if you know what I mean.

It's paid for..... right?
We've depleted our stockpiles of missiles to achieve our clear objectives for victory in Iran that is all worth the extra prices we are paying now even if it means we lack the means to help ourselves. Call back after we've re-loaded.

If the conflict ended today and the objective was to restore inventories to pre-war levels:
  • Missiles only: likely $1-5 billion
  • Total equipment and munition replacement: potentially several billion dollars more when aircraft losses, interceptors, spare parts, and heavy equipment are included.
  • Restoration timeline: roughly 1-3 years for most missile inventories, with some specialized interceptors potentially taking longer.
 

theoriginalSALTYdog

All-Conference
Jul 10, 2021
1,757
2,206
113
The debt has become laughable. No President in a long time has had the balls to veto spending bills. Bush wanted to partially privatize SS contributions and got crucified for it. The sad truth is the takers are growing and the makers are shrinking.
The problem is, neither side can do anything substantial about the debt without alienating half of the country so we just keep kicking the can down the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grinningmule

Choctaw Dawg

Junior
May 21, 2017
567
261
43
The debt has become laughable. No President in a long time has had the balls to veto spending bills. Bush wanted to partially privatize SS contributions and got crucified for it. The sad truth is the takers are growing and the makers are shrinking.
In the 50s, it was 16 makers for around 1 taker. Now its 1 maker for 1 taker. Nothing about that sustainable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BossDawg78

grinningmule

Heisman
Jul 15, 2021
5,035
18,293
113
Trump spends money like a drunken sailor and no one cares anymore about the debt. They just kick the can down the road. The interest on it is astronomical now.
Drunken sailors usually wake up with something tangible from their drunken spending. Hangovers, new tattoos, fresh case of the clap... Etc.
 

mstateglfr

All-American
Feb 24, 2008
16,693
6,504
113
The debt has become laughable. No President in a long time has had the balls to veto spending bills. Bush wanted to partially privatize SS contributions and got crucified for it. The sad truth is the takers are growing and the makers are shrinking.
Would partially privatizing Social Security have saved the government much money?
And how would privatizing Social Security have impacted the finances of citizens?

A quick search resulted in Google saying partially privatizing would have actually increased debt.

Used bandaid on a torn off limb.
IMG_3670.jpeg
 

Darryl Steight

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
4,439
7,416
113
We've depleted our stockpiles of missiles to achieve our clear objectives for victory in Iran that is all worth the extra prices we are paying now even if it means we lack the means to help ourselves. Call back after we've re-loaded.

If the conflict ended today and the objective was to restore inventories to pre-war levels:
  • Missiles only: likely $1-5 billion
  • Total equipment and munition replacement: potentially several billion dollars more when aircraft losses, interceptors, spare parts, and heavy equipment are included.
  • Restoration timeline: roughly 1-3 years for most missile inventories, with some specialized interceptors potentially taking longer.
I think dorndawg just likes to watch the world horshack spin.

wind up toy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: turkish

She Mate Me

Heisman
Dec 7, 2008
14,754
13,898
113
Would partially privatizing Social Security have saved the government much money?
And how would privatizing Social Security have impacted the finances of citizens?

A quick search resulted in Google saying partially privatizing would have actually increased debt.

Used bandaid on a torn off limb.
View attachment 1400076

Yes, it wouldn’t have worked because Social Security remains a Ponzi Scheme. You gotta have the new money to pay the old investors.

Hope I get mine before it collapses.
 

John Deaux VII

All-Conference
Jun 7, 2024
1,153
2,826
113
It absolutely would have increased the debt. At that point in time, payroll tax revenue still exceeded social security payments...so any decrease in payroll tax collections would simply decrease what went in the General Fund. Would the government had cut disbursements or raised revenue some place else to offset payroll tax collections that would gotten routed into private accounts? Nope.
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Mississippi State RB Kolin Wilson Q&A
  2. 02 Maroon and White Mississippi State LB Zakari Tillman Q&A
  3. 03 Maroon and White Jakheem Shumpert-Perkins Q&A
  4. 04 Maroon and White Sanfrisco Magee: Mississippi State practice a "battle every day"
  5. 05 Maroon and White Mississippi State OL LJ Prudhomme Q&A