If a player didn’t enter the portal before the ruling will have to play on the team they were on the year prior so no Jaxson kohler, etc.
but Keyshawn hall entered in April
but Keyshawn hall entered in April
After learning about the new ruling stipulations will Keyshawn Hall be one of the only ones actually available?
- Thread starter ThreeDogNight2
- Start date
Ashea Myles, who heard motion arguments July 22, also ordered that the transfer portal open at noon Monday until 8 a.m. on Aug. 10 for any player wanting to enter and schools wanting to reach out.
This judge had previously ruled on it, we‘ll see what happens.
This judge had previously ruled on it, we‘ll see what happens.
As a commentary, it is ludicrous that one judge can make up whatever rules they want on a whim like this.
It’s confusing to follow but Hall has already been included/addressed in a separate injunction than that Colorado one from this weekend. He was in the one with UC/Xavier guys like a week or so before.
But nothing for anyone is anything close to final to my understanding lol
But nothing for anyone is anything close to final to my understanding lol
Lmao so to pass a law we need 5 judges to convene and agree on something?
Judges should have no say whatsoever on anything NCAA related. They caused this mess to begin with
Makes Aberdeen look pretty smart entering the portal even when he was out of eligibility. Just in case.
Exactly right. This is a huge issue across the country now on a lot of topics. We need to actually enforce disbarment of these robes who believe they rule the country.
If the NCAA has to abide by the judges ruling, ok. But the NCAA can take a stand and say X player can play but that doesn't mean the team he plays on has to be included in post season play. Look at Vandy football as an example. They were left out of the playoffs I think because Pavia fought for a 7th!!!!!!!! year to play college football. Now I know the playoff committee is supposedly separate from the NCAA but they have to have some ties in there somewhere. That was a coordinated effort to keep them out at 10-2 in the SEC.
This is the correct answer!
So if you entered the portal when there was no reason to enter the portal, you’re good but now that there’s a reason to enter the portal you can’t if you hadn’t already done so. Gotcha.
How do you think it should work? This is how things have always worked here, what’s wrong with it?
Crystalsays
KENTUCKY
They also crystal balled Kohler to us, just think those posts are for clicks
IMO it’s because Judges stopped enforcing the law. When you can go shopping for the ruling you want, they are not basing their decision on law. Judges today are ruling based on opinion, corruption and politics. As another poster said. Disbar a few and maybe this crap stops??? Every time Tennessee wants something they go Judge shopping.
Judges used to have integrity. They don’t anymore.
Last edited:
Totally agree, you see it in politics on a regular basis even to the extend that they ignore established law and the Supreme Court.
Problem is judges aren’t the ones suppose to pass laws, they‘re supposed to rule on existing law.
Yes judges are supposed to pass “laws”
if a judge rules for a restraining order that’s law. It doesn’t need to go to the President first.
If a judge couldn’t pass rulings/ laws America wouldn’t work
You just want orange in office to have complete control
It works the exact same way it always has. What would you disbar them for? This is what people always say when the rulings go against what they want but courts are generally consistent and if this is truly not legal it can be appealed in moved up the ladder. Same as it ever was. It can be frustrating but changing it because of this seems silly.
I think a lot of people are forgetting that the courts blocked student loan forgiveness and the Mar a Lago cases when they are upset about one judge making big decisions.
No, judges rule based on existing law, a restraining order is part of existing law. Judges don’t make law, they enforce law And make rulings based on existing law. Unfortunately some judges try to legislate from the bench and this is not their job. A judge issue a restraining order based on the law, he didn’t just make a new law.
ALL judges should be replaced with AI.
But is what the judge doing a new law or a part of understanding the presidents 5&5 law? Like this had to happen at some point all you guys are mad about is how low ranking the judge is
The Sherman Antitrust Act is L
This is from AI -tifwiw.
So, the judge wasn’t overturning a law—she temporarily blocked enforcement of an NCAA rule because it may violate federal antitrust law.
The Sherman Antitrust Act IS Law, that's what she ruled on.
This is from AI -tifwiw.
- NCAA rule: A private association’s eligibility requirement.
- Sherman Antitrust Act: A federal law that the NCAA rule must comply with.
- Court order: Temporarily prevents the NCAA from applying part of its rule to the affected Class of 2022 athletes.
So, the judge wasn’t overturning a law—she temporarily blocked enforcement of an NCAA rule because it may violate federal antitrust law.
5& 5 is not a law. They are not trying to change the basic 5-in-5 rule. These players meet those requirements.
So basically every player will now enter the portal every year just in case there’s a rule change that appeals to them later on. This is beyond ridiculous at this point. A single looney judge can over ride and entire countries legal system.
This was always going to be the case until they have multi year contracts. I can't imagine how much worse this is for the coaches.
You were calling 5-in-5 the president’s new law. I was just pointing out that it is an NCAA rule, not a law. From reading several posts here—not just yours—I think that misunderstanding is fueling some of the confusion. That's all, no shade.
she is ruling based on federal law; she is not simply replacing the NCAA’s judgment with her own.
I’m regarded and really don’t know the difference with that stuff. I just kinda put everything he signs on his desk into a “law category”
Sorry if I sounded rude
What a childish remark
Latest
-
01
KSR
SEC's Greg Sankey among commissioners asking Louisville judge to deny extra year for Mark Mitchell, other 2022 athletes
-
02
KSR
11 Personnel: Kentucky Moves to Week Zero, SEC Fall Camp Buzz
-
03
KSR
Cumberland HS Football Field to be renamed after Kentucky legend Freddie Maggard
-
04
KSR
Kentucky has three Comeback Player of the Year candidates
-
05
KSR
KSR Happy Hour: Waiting for Jaxon Kohler's decision