2026 New Uniforms - HUGE numbers!

ScarletDave

Heisman

Oct 7, 2010

34,614

15,377

85

• Saturday at 1:40 PM

• #1

The complaints of the last 10+ years have finally been answered - after every year people complain about the numbers being too small to read, it looks like Rutgers and Nike have finally listened - new jersey pics are dropping today and the numbers look giant!

 

• 

Reactions: 24Babybull

ScarletDave

Heisman

Oct 7, 2010

34,614

15,377

85

• Saturday at 1:40 PM

• #2

 

• 

Reactions: Fat Koko

R

RUBlackout

All-American

Mar 11, 2008

10,960

7,079

113

• Saturday at 2:02 PM

• #3

And this is why we will be one of the best season is last 20yrs

 

DJ Spanky

Heisman

Jul 25, 2001

49,855

61,306

113

• Saturday at 3:19 PM

• #4

Why aren't they blinking?

 

RUTGERS95

Heisman

Sep 28, 2005

34,102

50,082

113

• Saturday at 4:01 PM

• #5

lol horrible

wish we could go back to the 05-06 unis, those were the best!

 

• 

Reactions: bac2therac and Anon1753410373

Tango Two

Heisman

Aug 21, 2001

59,125

37,863

78

• Saturday at 4:04 PM

• #6

As long as they are not black it’s all good…

 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer

Sep 21, 2001

197,182

149,236

113

• Saturday at 4:58 PM

• #7

Way better.

 

R

rutgersal_rivals139582

Heisman

Jun 7, 2001

36,543

43,934

113

• Saturday at 5:01 PM

• #8

These look terrific! The numbers are legible!

 

K

koleszar

Heisman

Jan 1, 2010

37,603

59,288

113

• Saturday at 5:04 PM

• #9

Nothing was worse than our Power Rangers years. When the sun was out, or there was a glare, I had no idea who the hell was who.

 

• 

Reactions: satnom

J

JL23

Junior

Oct 4, 2005

870

315

63

• Saturday at 6:14 PM

• #10

Now go back to making "Rutgers" big again along with the white neck collar, put a red stipe ala Bama style on the pants and get the 06 cleats back and we're cooking

 

R

RUGuitarMan1

All-Conference

Apr 5, 2021

2,537

3,963

73

• Saturday at 6:33 PM

• #11

Excellent! Really like those new unis. Looking sharp!

 

W

Waldo73

Senior

Nov 8, 2003

804

495

32

• Saturday at 7:25 PM

• #12

I like them!

 

DJ Spanky

Heisman

Jul 25, 2001

49,855

61,306

113

• Saturday at 7:38 PM

• #13

Those uniforms suck!!! Where are the battle scars???

 

Fat Koko

All-Conference

Nov 28, 2022

4,199

3,603

73

• Saturday at 9:37 PM

• #14

What has changed since last season's uniform shown below? Red and white, with the black outline to the numbers adding a touch of edge and visibility.

I like it.

One concern is Rutgers committed a material breach of its contract with Nike when #47 covered the Nike swoosh on his pants.

Rutgers must act to cure this breach within 30 days or Nike can terminate the contract. Rutgers has a rocky track record with apparel suppliers and should adhere to its Nike contract meticulously.

 

Last edited: Saturday at 9:50 PM

S

Section124

Heisman

Dec 21, 2002

17,346

22,402

96

• Yesterday at 7:13 AM

• #15

Maybe the players are just smaller.

 

• 
• 

Reactions: charliem24 and DHajekRC1984

Caliknight

Hall of Famer

Sep 21, 2001

197,182

149,236

113

• Today at 12:32 PM

• #16

Fat Koko said:

What has changed since last season's uniform shown below? Red and white, with the black outline to the numbers adding a touch of edge and visibility.

I like it.

One concern is Rutgers committed a material breach of its contract with Nike when #47 covered the Nike swoosh on his pants.

Rutgers must act to cure this breach within 30 days or Nike can terminate the contract. Rutgers has a rocky track record with apparel suppliers and should adhere to its Nike contract meticulously.

View attachment 1380692

Click to expand...

Doubt that's a breach. Those contracts extend to field of play in official competitions. Sure, this is an official release but...they aren't allowed to wear other brands, but they aren't obligated to make sure the swoosh is never not visible either.

We had a lacrosse player whose feet required special shoes. They had to petition Nike to wear them (NB made them bespoke) but only if the logo was taped over.

Dylan and Ace were sort of ahead of the curve but Rutgers contended our Adidas contract wasn't valid. There will be a player who will go to school and sponsored by another brand, and wear that brand in games. Flagg was a NB athlete at Duke but still wore Nike in games. Someone is going to challenge that. Surprised it hasn't happened already.

 

Richie O

Hall of Famer

Staff member

Mar 21, 2016

70,509

238,128

113

• 15 minutes ago

• #17

Fat Koko said:

What has changed since last season's uniform shown below? Red and white, with the black outline to the numbers adding a touch of edge and visibility.

I like it.

One concern is Rutgers committed a material breach of its contract with Nike when #47 covered the Nike swoosh on his pants.

Rutgers must act to cure this breach within 30 days or Nike can terminate the contract. Rutgers has a rocky track record with apparel suppliers and should adhere to its Nike contract meticulously.

View attachment 1380692

Click to expand...

That is not a material breach of its contract, it's literally his shirt just covering it in his instagram post and not an official post from the team. I promise you no one cares that much with this case.

 

Richie O

Hall of Famer

Staff member

Mar 21, 2016

70,509

238,128

113

• 13 minutes ago

• #18

Tango Two said:

As long as they are not black it’s all good…

Click to expand...

Don't worry, the black unis are coming and they are the same as last year.

 

Richie O

Hall of Famer

Staff member

Mar 21, 2016

70,509

238,128

113

• 10 minutes ago

• #19

ScarletDave said:

The complaints of the last 10+ years have finally been answered - after every year people complain about the numbers being too small to read, it looks like Rutgers and Nike have finally listened - new jersey pics are dropping today and the numbers look giant!

Click to expand...

I'm like 90% sure these are the same exact uniforms as last year, but I'll ask around.