Should California and Minnesota stop paying federal taxes?

ClemsonInAtlanta

All-Conference
Jan 20, 2019
898
1,384
93
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
 

BrianNole777

All-American
Jun 5, 2025
5,934
6,029
113
No Way Trump GIF by MOODMAN
 

Finance85

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2022
1,338
2,352
113
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
Please provide data, with sources, that support your claim. What federal taxes are paid, by category. from the state? What disbursements, by category, is paid to each state?

How do you account for people's mobility? If someone worked their entire life in NY, then retired to Florida, how does that affect your statistics?
 

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
11,224
11,927
113
They should stop paying taxes and as part of it no longer be eligible for the lottery and lets check what happens to their budgets in a decade.... lulz.
 

o_wausauhawk

Heisman
Jan 2, 2023
4,121
10,295
113
Please provide data, with sources, that support your claim. What federal taxes are paid, by category. from the state? What disbursements, by category, is paid to each state?

How do you account for people's mobility? If someone worked their entire life in NY, then retired to Florida, how does that affect your statistics?
Do you think Trump should be holding payments up for any reason, let alone one born of political pettiness?
 

Wobmam Rulez!

All-American
Aug 4, 2025
3,676
5,809
113
Like everything with this pathetic cosplay administration, Minny and Cali will get paid and the cosplay characters will continue to look dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
379
398
63
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
I would be very happy if California would secede from the country and join up with Mexico. Maybe have some sort of agreement for a national sea port in Calif. I would note that California with its high taxes and war on the wealthy could very easily end up being a net beneficiary of funds from the United States.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Jun 4, 2026
1,038
270
83
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
Do you know what Califags pay in gas tax?

Of course you don't, retard.
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
34,439
9,816
113
I would be very happy if California would secede from the country and join up with Mexico. Maybe have some sort of agreement for a national sea port in Calif. I would note that California with its high taxes and war on the wealthy could very easily end up being a net beneficiary of funds from the United States.
Dear Bowling Green graduate: Your continued expressions of hatred for all things California are duly noted. Meanwhile, have you seen the tee shirt pictured below? It is quite popular among Penn State fans:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

DailyBuck7

Junior
Mar 4, 2026
379
398
63
Dear Bowling Green graduate: Your continue expressions of hatred for all things California are duly noted. Meanwhile, have you seen the tee shirt pictured below? It is quite popular among Penn State fans:

Funny for a Univ of Calif graduate to put down Bowling Green. In any event, here is what Palmer Luckey the inventor of Oculus and the CEO of the most sophisticated drone company in the world (Anduril) had to say about Ohio while planning to build a $5 billion factory just south of Columbus -- from ChatGPT ""Ohio was the only option." ..... He followed that by saying: "Ohio is the only state that moves at the speed this moment demands."....
"There are only a
handful of places in the world where you have the workforce, the regulatory climate, the access to transit and transportation all come together." .... "I really couldn't ask for a better place to build a fighter jet factory."
One anecdote he shared is especially revealing. He said that when he met Ohio leaders
: "Usually when I meet with legislators... I'm asking for help with something." But in Ohio:

"This time there was literally nothing to ask for." He explained that local leaders had already addressed the permitting, infrastructure, and logistical issues before he needed to raise them.

Also CNBC recently rated Ohio as the best state to do business in for 2026.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,404
113
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
California receives more money from the federal government than any other state.......period.

Yes, California consistently pays more in federal taxes than it receives in federal grants and funding, making it a "donor state". [1, 2]
In recent years, California has contributed roughly $80 billion to $275 billion more to the federal treasury than it receives in return, meaning its residents and businesses subsidize federal spending in other states. [1, 2, 3]
However, because California is the most populous and wealthiest state in the U.S., it also receives the largest total dollar amount of federal aid of any state. But when evaluated on a "per dollar paid vs. per dollar received" basis, California's massive tax contributions vastly outweigh the federal grants and expenditures flowing back into the state. [1, 2, 3, 4]
 

o_wausauhawk

Heisman
Jan 2, 2023
4,121
10,295
113
I would be very happy if California would secede from the country and join up with Mexico. Maybe have some sort of agreement for a national sea port in Calif. I would note that California with its high taxes and war on the wealthy could very easily end up being a net beneficiary of funds from the United States.
Tom Hanks Dipshit GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

Titanhawk

Senior
Jul 14, 2011
582
608
93
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
How is it that states pay federal taxes? What taxes are you talking about? Taxes that employers pay, other business pay? Taxes the states aren't involved with?
 

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,984
14,795
113
I would be very happy if California would secede from the country and join up with Mexico. Maybe have some sort of agreement for a national sea port in Calif. I would note that California with its high taxes and war on the wealthy could very easily end up being a net beneficiary of funds from the United States.
lol… hey @Finance85 , you gonna ask this one for “receipts”?
 

Anon1750875978

Heisman
Dec 26, 2018
7,913
13,675
113
I dislike the fact that Blue State taxes subsidize Red States.

If we continue this trend, reduce political influence.
Just have Red States get one US Senator.
 

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,646
5,070
113
The states of California and Minnesota don't pay federal taxes, their citizens do...
this isn't wrong, but i think the most accurate version is "the employers do (on behalf their employees)"

maybe the state govt's and other affilated organizations that have 10s or 100s of thousands of employees could withhold payment (i'm certainly no expert here)
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,403
14,634
113

1. States with the Highest State-Level Debt (2025–2026 data)​


These are the states carrying the largest direct state debt burdens (general obligation bonds, etc.):


RankStateTotal State Debt (approx.)
1California~$520 billion
2New York~$420 billion
3Texas~$320 billion
4Illinois~$280 billion
5Pennsylvania~$220 billion
6Florida~$190 billion
7New Jersey~$180 billion
8Massachusetts~$150 billion
9Ohio~$140 billion
10Michigan~$130 billion



2. States with Largest Unfunded Liabilities (Biggest Long-Term Drag)​


These create future pressure on the federal budget (pensions, retiree healthcare):


  1. California
  2. Illinois
  3. New York
  4. Texas
  5. New Jersey
  6. Pennsylvania
  7. Ohio
  8. Michigan
  9. Florida
  10. Massachusetts

Bottom line: California is consistently #1 in both categories and has the single biggest indirect impact on national fiscal pressure.
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,255
6,115
113
this isn't wrong, but i think the most accurate version is "the employers do (on behalf their employees)"

maybe the state govt's and other affilated organizations that have 10s or 100s of thousands of employees could withhold payment (i'm certainly no expert here)

So, an employer withholds employee federal taxes from their payroll and then refuses to pass those dollars on to the IRS, leaving the individual taxpaying employees in default,.. The lawyers would love that class action suit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

jimneffer

All-American
Jan 27, 2026
1,646
5,070
113
So, an employer withholds employee federal taxes from their payroll and then refuses to pass those dollars on to the IRS, leaving the individual taxpaying employees in default,.. The lawyers would love that class action suit.
look...i'm just spitballing here. i'm generally with you that there's no real way to do this

but i will point out/ask about sovereign immunity. as far as i know, states are exempted from class action suits

again...fully admit - i'm well outside my area of even general knowledge here
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifler
Jun 1, 2026
1,053
382
63
California pays $200-300 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government in payment. Much of this money is then redistributed to poorer states, most of which are red states in the southeast who are impoverished and uneducated.

Minnesota pays roughly $45 billion more in federal taxes than it receives from the federal government. Again, much of this money is redistributed to poorer red states who objectively leech off of the federal government.

However, our inadequate leadership (Trump) has deemed it necessary to withhold $1b in Medicaid payments to these states for no real reason other than emotional instability.

Since Minnesota and California have had their agreement with federal government violated by our leadership, should they be obligated to continue to pay?

Why should California and Minnesota continue to subsidize the poor red states? Should the red states not lift themselves up out of poverty through hard work? Why are hardworking Californians and Minnesotans sending their hard earned tax dollars to the lazy and poor states of South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, etc.?

Thoughtful answers appreciated
If this is true, maybe they should be getting some of that money back to attempt to clean up some of the messes in each of these cities. How many shootings took place in Minneapolis this weekend?
 

GesterHawk

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
20,307
39,530
113
I would be very happy if California would secede from the country and join up with Mexico. Maybe have some sort of agreement for a national sea port in Calif. I would note that California with its high taxes and war on the wealthy could very easily end up being a net beneficiary of funds from the United States.
That Is Dumb Will Ferrell GIF by MOODMAN
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,893
22,669
113
Well, 76% of federal state subsidies are spent on Medicaid (65%) and income security (11%). Since poors vote heavily democrat - even in red states like SC - this would hurt democrat voters more than anyone else.

So sure, let’s go for it. Red states should just direct these folks to move to CA or MN or other blue states if they want federal assistance.
 

lucas80

Heisman
Jan 30, 2008
13,689
31,933
113
So, an employer withholds employee federal taxes from their payroll and then refuses to pass those dollars on to the IRS, leaving the individual taxpaying employees in default,.. The lawyers would love that class action suit.
Kind of like Trump refusing to extend dollars authorized by Congress to blue states
 

ClemsonInAtlanta

All-Conference
Jan 20, 2019
898
1,384
93
California receives more money from the federal government than any other state.......period.

Yes, California consistently pays more in federal taxes than it receives in federal grants and funding, making it a "donor state". [1, 2]
In recent years, California has contributed roughly $80 billion to $275 billion more to the federal treasury than it receives in return, meaning its residents and businesses subsidize federal spending in other states. [1, 2, 3]
However, because California is the most populous and wealthiest state in the U.S., it also receives the largest total dollar amount of federal aid of any state. But when evaluated on a "per dollar paid vs. per dollar received" basis, California's massive tax contributions vastly outweigh the federal grants and expenditures flowing back into the state. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Thank you for proving my point.

The question is should California demand a larger share of federal funds as it is weighed down by welfare states in the southeast?

How many lazy Americans in the southeast are living off of welfare being funded by the wealthy blue states of California and Minnesota?

California and Minnesota should demand an investigation into red states finances, there is probably a lot of fraud in those poor states

🚨🚨🚨🚨
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
47,346
36,404
113
Thank you for proving my point.

The question is should California demand a larger share of federal funds as it is weighed down by welfare states in the southeast?

How many lazy Americans in the southeast are living off of welfare being funded by the wealthy blue states of California and Minnesota?

California and Minnesota should demand an investigation into red states finances, there is probably a lot of fraud in those poor states

🚨🚨🚨🚨
Very weak response. You have a fixation on a boogeyman that lives in your pee brain referred to as a lazy American in red states while at the same time totally ignoring millions of illegal immigrants living here and receiving maximum welfare and every other government handout they can find.

Let's cut all payments to illegals and then start putting any Americans on welfare in a good job.
 

ClemsonInAtlanta

All-Conference
Jan 20, 2019
898
1,384
93
Very weak response. You have a fixation on a boogeyman that lives in your pee brain referred to as a lazy American in red states while at the same time totally ignoring millions of illegal immigrants living here and receiving maximum welfare and every other government handout they can find.

Let's cut all payments to illegals and then start putting any Americans on welfare in a good job.
Nice subject change. We are talking about lazy, entitled, leeching welfare red states living off of government handouts funded by hardworking citizens in blue states. If the president wants to withhold federal funding to blue states, why should they pay any money to the federal government?

Illegal immigrants don’t receive welfare by the way. You don’t need to post some made up tweet written by a Pakistani bot being paid to feed you misinformation in return.

The sooner you accept the fact that your entire understanding of how the world works is completely wrong the better off you and the rest of us who have to deal with you will be. I guarantee it
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls