After making it through maybe half of Trump’s incoherent, meandering, imbecilic musings…

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,744
24,670
113
You guys are awfully desperate. It’s really sad. All of this rampant cheating and Team MAGA has produced nothing burgers in 6 years. And that’s being generous.

Revisiting the Russia hoax of 2016, Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel indicted 34 people which led to 8 guilty pleas and 1 conviction.

That’s a little tastier nothing burger in my book.
The same Mueller that got 34 people but couldn’t remember what he hate for breakfast when under oath. Doesn’t smell fishy at all to you? lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,940
14,715
113
I admit that I did not watch the address. So, I don't know if it was political or factual - although I would guess it was intended to be both.

I do know, that Biden was inaugurated as President in 2021 and that he served 4 years as President. So a rational person would assume he was elected. And, in spite of all the prognoses that Trump would not leave the White House, he did.

But, from what I read, Trump laid out some "facts" from various intelligence communities that pointed out some inadequacies in our elections process and the possibilities that some outsiders are interfering in our elections. Now, I don't know if any of that is true or just trump rationalizing his loss in 2020. But, if there is even a modicum of truth in what Trump is saying, we should have some bipartisan group take a hard look at whatever evidence there is to support Trump's claims. My guess would be that part of what trump said was just "trump BS" but that some parts were true. So rather than just ignore it, maybe there's some value in an investigation.
The 2020 election is the single most investigated, researched, litigated election in US history. And you want to take another look based on the brainless BS spewed by a fascist WOB?

That you speak of "facts" is laughable. Trump's choice to head the US intel community, Jay Clayton, refused repeatedly to state that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. This is the guy who's supposed to sit in the Oval Office and give POTUS the hard truths about the world - like, you know, "If you invade Iran, they'll close the Strait of Hormuz and they can keep it closed indefinitely absent a massive invasion". That's something every previous admin (save one) understood. This azzhat can't even tell POTUS he lost an election by 7 million votes and you think they give a single damn about "facts"? 😂 :ROFLMAO: 😂 :ROFLMAO: 😂 :ROFLMAO:

The only time you'll hear anything resembling the truth from DJT is when there's a payout in it for him. Period.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,727
27,984
113
The 2020 election is the single most investigated, researched, litigated election in US history. And you want to take another look based on the brainless BS spewed by a fascist WOB?

That you speak of "facts" is laughable. Trump's choice to head the US intel community, Jay Clayton, refused repeatedly to state that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. This is the guy who's supposed to sit in the Oval Office and give POTUS the hard truths about the world - like, you know, "If you invade Iran, they'll close the Strait of Hormuz and they can keep it closed indefinitely absent a massive invasion". That's something every previous admin (save one) understood. This azzhat can't even tell POTUS he lost an election by 7 million votes and you think they give a single damn about "facts"? 😂 :ROFLMAO: 😂 :ROFLMAO: 😂 :ROFLMAO:

The only time you'll hear anything resembling the truth from DJT is when there's a payout in it for him. Period.



OSSOFF Speaking in Atlanta

Ossoff: I don’t know if you saw, but I had the opportunity to question the president’s nominee to be Director of National Intelligence.

And I asked Mr. Clayton, the nominee, a very simple question. I asked him who had won the 2020 presidential election.

He was unable—he was unwilling—to answer that question truthfully under oath.

Because it’s like an initiation, right? It’s like the cost of admission to Donald Trump’s inner circle is that you must prove you are willing to lie to Congress.

So he sat there—you can watch the tape—he sat there over and over and over again, refusing to state a basic fact because that is what his boss demanded of him.

And it was a basic fact about American elections.

And this man is now in line, if he’s confirmed, to be the top intelligence officer in the United States.

Now remember who his predecessor has been: Tulsi Gabbard.

Y’all have heard that name because Tulsi Gabbard, the senior-most intelligence officer in the United States—not a law enforcement official, okay, the spy chief—was sent down to Georgia by the president to oversee the seizure of your ballots from an election facility here in Georgia.

When you reflect on the kinds of things that happen in corrupt and abusive governments around the world, when the security officials—okay, when the spy chief—is getting involved in ballot raids at election facilities, that’s a huge red flag.

And that the man he’s now appointed to replace her will not state under oath basic facts about recent elections, as the president gives these menacing primetime remarks signaling clearly his intent to attack the elections and to undermine voting rights, sends a chill down all of our spines—Democrats, independents, and Republicans.

It’s not enough just to win this fall. We have to win so decisively. We have to rebuke these abuses so clearly that no president for centuries will dare this kind of brazen abuse and corruption.
 

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,940
14,715
113


OSSOFF Speaking in Atlanta

Ossoff: I don’t know if you saw, but I had the opportunity to question the president’s nominee to be Director of National Intelligence.

And I asked Mr. Clayton, the nominee, a very simple question. I asked him who had won the 2020 presidential election.

He was unable—he was unwilling—to answer that question truthfully under oath.

Because it’s like an initiation, right? It’s like the cost of admission to Donald Trump’s inner circle is that you must prove you are willing to lie to Congress.

So he sat there—you can watch the tape—he sat there over and over and over again, refusing to state a basic fact because that is what his boss demanded of him.

And it was a basic fact about American elections.

And this man is now in line, if he’s confirmed, to be the top intelligence officer in the United States.

Now remember who his predecessor has been: Tulsi Gabbard.

Y’all have heard that name because Tulsi Gabbard, the senior-most intelligence officer in the United States—not a law enforcement official, okay, the spy chief—was sent down to Georgia by the president to oversee the seizure of your ballots from an election facility here in Georgia.

When you reflect on the kinds of things that happen in corrupt and abusive governments around the world, when the security officials—okay, when the spy chief—is getting involved in ballot raids at election facilities, that’s a huge red flag.

And that the man he’s now appointed to replace her will not state under oath basic facts about recent elections, as the president gives these menacing primetime remarks signaling clearly his intent to attack the elections and to undermine voting rights, sends a chill down all of our spines—Democrats, independents, and Republicans.

It’s not enough just to win this fall. We have to win so decisively. We have to rebuke these abuses so clearly that no president for centuries will dare this kind of brazen abuse and corruption.

I watched it... it was brutal watching Clayton grovel to Trump in real time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

TarponSpringsNole

All-Conference
Aug 4, 2022
990
3,647
93
Any Florida folks find any issues with your voter registration?

I checked online the other day, and the state changed my party affiliation to “no affiliation.”

I’ve had the same voter registration since 2013.
 
Last edited: