Happy 4th from Larry David!

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,165
5,302
113
Fuck_this anti American commie bastard_.
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
 

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,382
18,415
113
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
Both sides!!
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,150
26,782
113
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
How many times has one party watched their candidate pathologically lie about an election, try to overturn the results with a myriad of schemes, including mob violence and still vote not to convict him even though he was out of office at the time? Can you think of a similar circumstance?

And what about when the Senate Majority leader said the courts should handle it and a special prosecutor was named who worked his *** off to get him charged and ex-President Donald Trump prompted the Supreme Court to dismiss federal criminal charges and they delayed the ruling until the very last minute until it was too late to go forward with the trial due to the election. Can you remember a SC acting that partially on behalf of a President?


Surely you have a both sides argument, right?
 
Last edited:

magaboy

Senior
Apr 26, 2026
453
749
93
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
😅😅 Ned trying to thread the needle on a scene from a TV show
 

stillh8unlv

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2007
1,759
3,969
113
Its very easy. This shit_bag is a pawn for the communist insurrection in progress. Im not your student. You can go look up the definition of communism and plaster it on here all day if you want.
You sound smart

Homer Simpson GIF