Huge soccer news…

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,208
7,750
113
That basically means FIFA didn’t think it should’ve been a red card. But L4 will be here in a second to tell us why FIFA is wrong.
It is still a straight red, that wasn't overturned. The suspension was. Suspensions do get overturned in league play sometimes . This is very unusual at the WC. It will leak out why eventually. Of course we all know that FIFA is always right, transparent, incorruptible, and never succumbs to pressure of any kind. Anyway, great news for the US team.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
58,908
29,243
113
That basically means FIFA didn’t think it should’ve been a red card. But L4 will be here in a second to tell us why FIFA is wrong.
I suspect what it means is they’d like to see the host nation at full strength. Regardless I’m glad he’ll be able to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GomJabbar

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,208
7,750
113
To be fair, he did watch some liverpool matches in the '90s. Basically an expert.
Didn't see too many in the 90s actually. They didn't start showing up here on cable till the early 00s. I used to watch what was basically the "Match of the Day" show every weekend starting around 94 though.
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
39,846
20,221
113
Yep, I imagine they were under intense pressure to do this.
Thats Good Donald Glover GIF
 

Podgy

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2022
3,724
4,244
113
B-52's headed to Fifa headquarters recalled as well.***
Hell yeah. Now it's on. Dude has definitely been a challenge for defenses.
Optics don't look good but it seems reasonable although I bet Belgium doesn't think that way.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,208
7,750
113
I just read the FIFA statement. The suspension is suspended for a one year probationary period....whatever that means. Someone that knows more than me might say different, but that is a new one on me.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
58,908
29,243
113
I just read the FIFA statement. The suspension is suspended for a one year probationary period....whatever that means. Someone that knows more than me might say different, but that is a new one on me.
It means they want the host team at full strength. Just like they wanted Renaldo in all 3 group stage games so they swapped the last 2 games of his 3-match ban for a similar suspension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackShephard

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
58,908
29,243
113
Yep, I imagine they were under intense pressure to do this.
I doubt it. FIFA does what FIFA wants to do. They know a quarter final game involving USA will be more lucrative than a quarter final game involving Belgium.
 
Nov 16, 2005
28,509
22,591
113
Jesus. What a cluster17. Not saying what the right or wrong call is for the red card / suspension, but the optics on this are absolutely terrible. Just make up your mind and enforce the decision.

FWIW, I think the correct call should have been just not giving him the red card in the first place.
First time? It’s FIFA, they play favorites and will do random off the wall things like this
 

Perd Hapley

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
6,257
7,449
113
First time? It’s FIFA, they play favorites and will do random off the wall things like this
I’m not talking about just FIFA here.

The ref on the field decided “incidental contact / no card”.

Then VAR ref overrules the guy on the field, and says “red card / suspension”.

Then FIFA overrules the overruling, and suspends the suspension (that sentence hurt my brain to type, but it’s accurate).

The overall result here - 17ing nobody seems to really know what the rules are, not even the folks in charge of enforcing them.

That’s terrible optics, and a huge criticism of international soccer in general here…..not just FIFA.
 
Nov 16, 2005
28,509
22,591
113
I’m not talking about just FIFA here.

The ref on the field decided “incidental contact / no card”.

Then VAR ref overrules the guy on the field, and says “red card / suspension”.

Then FIFA overrules the overruling, and suspends the suspension (that sentence hurt my brain to type, but it’s accurate).

The overall result here - 17ing nobody seems to really know what the rules are, not even the folks in charge of enforcing them.

That’s terrible optics, and a huge criticism of international soccer in general here…..not just FIFA.
He’s still going to be suspended, but they suspended his suspension. Yeah, that was a terrible sentence. So the rules are still in place and he still has the red card but they just played their hand and said we want him for the TV ratings which is what FIFA is all about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maroon Eagle

Perd Hapley

All-American
Sep 30, 2022
6,257
7,449
113
He’s still going to be suspended, but they suspended his suspension. Yeah, that was a terrible sentence. So the rules are still in place and he still has the red card but they just played their hand and said we want him for the TV ratings which is what FIFA is all about.
How is he still suspended? The probationary period is one year. The World Cup is over in like 2 weeks. If he goes past the “one year” with no further incident, he’s off scott free. If he has another incident in the WC somehow, he essentially gets a 2-for-1 bargain on red cards. If he has no further incident in the WC but something happens right after, he misses like one qualifying match for whatever the next meaningless international tournament is.

It’s a virtual non-suspension at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

Podgy

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2022
3,724
4,244
113
How is he still suspended? The probationary period is one year. The World Cup is over in like 2 weeks. If he goes past the “one year” with no further incident, he’s off scott free. If he has another incident in the WC somehow, he essentially gets a 2-for-1 bargain on red cards. If he has no further incident in the WC but something happens right after, he misses like one qualifying match for whatever the next meaningless international tournament is.

It’s a virtual non-suspension at this point.
And some say Americans don't have great ideas to change rules.
 

615dawg

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
7,052
4,293
113

Rumor: The VAR referee was Juan Ernesto Soto Arevalo from Venezuela. He is the one that adamantly called for the red card. Jerome Brisard from France was the assistant VAR referee and went to FIFA and said that there was bias in the decision.

There is no mechanism to reverse a red card yet FIFA did so. This is unprecedented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eckie1

POTUS

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
4,387
11,672
113
Rumor: The VAR referee was Juan Ernesto Soto Arevalo from Venezuela. He is the one that adamantly called for the red card. Jerome Brisard from France was the assistant VAR referee and went to FIFA and said that there was bias in the decision.

There is no mechanism to reverse a red card yet FIFA did so. This is unprecedented.
Trying to get revenge for Maduro?
 

Dawgbite

Heisman
Nov 1, 2011
9,401
10,349
113
I think FIFA just did it to poke the dead injuns and not some Belgium RAT will score three goals by halftime. Some of that reverse voodoo crap.
 

FlotownDawg

All-American
Aug 30, 2012
7,010
7,530
113
Also, Argentina defender Nicolas Otamendi and Ecuadorian midfielder Moises Caicedo had one game suspensions for red cards they received in World Cup qualifiers suspended so they could play in their teams’ World Cup openers.