It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.Fuck_this anti American commie bastard_.
Define communism. How does it apply here?Fuck_this anti American commie bastard_.
Both sides!!It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.
I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
How many times has one party watched their candidate pathologically lie about an election, try to overturn the results with a myriad of schemes, including mob violence and still vote not to convict him even though he was out of office at the time? Can you think of a similar circumstance?It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.
I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?