Happy 4th from Larry David!

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,064
5,222
113
Fuck_this anti American commie bastard_.
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,323
18,332
113
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
Both sides!!
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
31,960
26,390
113
It's hard to comprehend how easy it was to get the supreme court structured as a group of yes men (which is really kind of sexist). Now Trump can get anything he wants through the court..Oh, wait, that's not a totally accurate statement. Didn't these yes men vote against trump positions on Traiffs, independent agency firings, immigration and deportations, and financial and tax records.

I do agree with his statement on members of Congress putting party over the people. How many times have members of parties voted totally among part lines?
How many times has one party watched their candidate pathologically lie about an election, try to overturn the results with a myriad of schemes, including mob violence and still vote not to convict him even though he was out of office at the time? Can you think of a similar circumstance?

And what about when the Senate Majority leader said the courts should handle it and a special prosecutor was named who worked his *** off to get him charged and ex-President Donald Trump prompted the Supreme Court to dismiss federal criminal charges and they delayed the ruling until the very last minute until it was too late to go forward with the trial due to the election. Can you remember a SC acting that partially on behalf of a President?

Surely you have a both sides argument, right?