Strange goings-on at McKeesport High School (Kemon Spell's school)

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,355
3,591
113
Brandon Short filed a complaint regarding coaches who testified for the defense of the guy who murdered his daughter. He asked for their resignation/removal.
I don't believe it was anyone involved in testimony.

I believe it was at the sentencing hearing - where individuals will often speak to the court wrt the convicted individual, and their thoughts wrt "fair sentence".
One (or more) of the individuals who spoke wrt "leniency" (for lack of a better term) in the sentencing was a member of the McKeesport coaching staff. Someone can check.


In any event, it has since devolved into tumult regarding the McKeesport football program. In a small western PA town, with not much else going on, the football program becomes quite the center of attention. Obviously.
 

Chumboshifko1

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2025
2,062
1,921
113
I don't believe it was anyone involved in testimony.

I believe it was at the sentencing hearing - where individuals will often speak to the court wrt the convicted individual, and their thoughts wrt "fair sentence".
One (or more) of the individuals who spoke wrt "leniency" (for lack of a better term) in the sentencing was a member of the McKeesport coaching staff. Someone can check.


In any event, it has since devolved into tumult regarding the McKeesport football program. In a small western PA town, with not much else going on, the football program becomes quite the center of attention. Obviously.

Pittsburgh media reported the coaches appeared as character witnesses for the murderer.
 

HarrisburgDave

All-Conference
Dec 29, 2016
1,240
1,890
113
I can't blame Brandon Short, or any parent, feeling betrayed when school officials speak on behalf of someone who killed their child. Misplaced sympathy like that disgusts me. It is best to let the system work and have the criminals pay the fulll price for their awful actions.
 
Last edited:

LionJim

Heisman
Oct 12, 2021
15,521
21,445
113
I can't blame Brandon Short, or any parent, feeling betrayed when school officials speak on behalf of someone who killed their child. Misplaced sympathy like that disgusts me. It is best to let the system work and have the criminals pay the fulll price for their awful actions.
Concur. Every situation is different, but in this one I think you’re spot on.
 

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,355
3,591
113
““We needed some fresh blood, just like the Pittsburgh Steelers did," board member Mark Holtzman said Wednesday night.“

That just sounds so stupid.
The type of thing someone would say when they feel the #1 priority of the school district (and the community) is "football". And, wrt McKeesport, that may be accurate.
 

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
568
494
63
I can't blame Brandon Short, or any parent, feeling betrayed when school officials speak on behalf of someone who killed their child. Misplaced sympathy like that disgusts me. It is best to let the system work and have the criminals pay the fulll price for their awful actions.

Concur. Every situation is different, but in this one I think you’re spot on.
That is the system working. Someone who is convicted of a crime is entitled to have people speak on their behalf at sentencing.

One of those mentioned is not a "school official" and the other is an assistant coach. Is it the school district's place to prevent them from speaking? One might understand Short's sense of "betrayal" if he ever showed up in McKeesport for anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUFTG

NittPicker

Heisman
Jun 30, 2001
6,229
13,202
113
I can't blame Brandon Short, or any parent, feeling betrayed when school officials speak on behalf of someone who killed their child. Misplaced sympathy like that disgusts me. It is best to let the system work and have the criminals pay the fulll price for their awful actions.
Being a character witness for a convicted murderer is bizarre to me. "Your honor, he's a good man when he's not killing people".
 

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
568
494
63
Being a character witness for a convicted murderer is bizarre to me. "Your honor, he's a good man when he's not killing people".
Maybe, but that's not what a character witness is asked.

Or what about a "convicted murderer" for who the decision is later overturned on the discovery of exculpating evidence?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JesseBelle

Chumboshifko1

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2025
2,062
1,921
113
That is the system working. Someone who is convicted of a crime is entitled to have people speak on their behalf at sentencing.

One of those mentioned is not a "school official" and the other is an assistant coach. Is it the school district's place to prevent them from speaking? One might understand Short's sense of "betrayal" if he ever showed up in McKeesport for anything else.

Short started a scholarship fund for local athletes to pursue higher education. He also has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for athletes to pursue higher education.
 

NittPicker

Heisman
Jun 30, 2001
6,229
13,202
113
Maybe, but that's not what a character witness is asked.

Or what about a "convicted murderer" for who the decision is later overturned on the discovery of exculpating evidence?
I have no idea what a character witness is asked. But the fact they're appearing as a character witness implies they're sympathetic toward him.

Your second sentence is simply a hypothetical which would be a good discussion in a law school class. But whether or not the decision is later overturned is irrelevant to what a character witness says at sentencing. Also, if that witness was personally aware of exculpatory evidence, the defense was negligent in not having them testify at trial.
 

LionJim

Heisman
Oct 12, 2021
15,521
21,445
113
That is the system working. Someone who is convicted of a crime is entitled to have people speak on their behalf at sentencing.
Sure. But this is first degree murder. Same thing with pedophile priests. If someone asked me to be a character witness for a murderer my first reaction would be, “It’s evident I didn’t know the guy the way I thought I did.” There’s always a line, and ymmv but this particular line I wouldn’t cross.
 

Mufasa94

Senior
Jan 9, 2009
1,167
991
113
So the head coach was forced out because an assistant was a character witness?
Not saying it is right or wrong, but another issue that has been mentioned is the head coach’s dad has been the leader (for decades) of a church that some who had left have described as cult-like. Here is an older article about the church:
Former Members Of McKeesport Church Say It Is "Cult-Like" - CBS Pittsburgh

The convicted murderer and the assistant coach belonged to said church.

One last thing, McKeesport lost to Aliquippa last year in the WPIAL championship when they were the top seeded team.
 

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
568
494
63
Short started a scholarship fund for local athletes to pursue higher education. He also has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for athletes to pursue higher education.
His fund is not directed specifically at athletes, but rather students affected directly or indirectly by gun violence. Noble cause, but not the same as showing up in McKeesport on a regular basis.
 

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
568
494
63
Sure. But this is first degree murder. Same thing with pedophile priests. If someone asked me to be a character witness for a murderer my first reaction would be, “It’s evident I didn’t know the guy the way I thought I did.” There’s always a line, and ymmv but this particular line I wouldn’t cross.
That's fine, your decision. But someone convicted of a crime is entitled to have character witnesses, and it's not the place of employers of potential character witnesses to prevent them from making statements, or the families of victims to exact retribution..
 

Bvillebaron

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2004
2,976
2,944
113
That is the system working. Someone who is convicted of a crime is entitled to have people speak on their behalf at sentencing.

One of those mentioned is not a "school official" and the other is an assistant coach. Is it the school district's place to prevent them from speaking? One might understand Short's sense of "betrayal" if he ever showed up in McKeesport for anything else.
Of course it’s not the school’s place to prevent them from speaking. On the other hand, it is the school’s prerogative to fire them.
 

Bvillebaron

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2004
2,976
2,944
113
That's fine, your decision. But someone convicted of a crime is entitled to have character witnesses, and it's not the place of employers of potential character witnesses to prevent them from making statements, or the families of victims to exact retribution..
See my other post. The families of the victim have the same right to exact retribution as the persons who choose to be character witnesses for the murderer.
 

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
568
494
63
See my other post. The families of the victim have the same right to exact retribution as the persons who choose to be character witnesses for the murderer.
Must be okay to muck around with the criminal justice system if one doesn't like the way it operates.