Bernie Moreno and Elizabeth Warren: Our Plan to Save Social Security

firegiver

Heisman
Sep 10, 2007
73,787
20,452
113
well remember, with Obamacare there was supposed to be more preventive care and less dependency for people to go to the emergency room. That didn't happen. I would predict the same thing for fat people going to the doctor. Look at Medicaid, lots of fat people in the program.
Also, remember Republicans defunded it. The best way conservatives prove a collective agreement doesn't work is to sabotage it.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,855
22,548
113
This blaming the billionaires is so stupid and disingenuous, because there are less than 1,000 billionaires in this country. Are you telling me that less than 1,000 people are the cause of most ofthe govt budget woes, people starving, homeless , and any other problems that YOU, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani can fabricate. This is a total lie that dems and dem socialists - NO difference- dream up to try and PUNISH success.
You could confiscate all of the billionaires money and still would not make any difference in peoples lives. Who is going to manage that money: the people who took it or the people who made it?

Not to mention, they are bringing up billionaires in a thread discussing raising taxes on people making $185K.

Even if we all agree billionaires should pay more, or even 100+ millionaires ... why are we then proposing that a dad making $200K to support his family should get a tax increase? These people make no sense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris

flotiger

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2011
1,536
2,408
113
This blaming the billionaires is so stupid and disingenuous, because there are less than 1,000 billionaires in this country. Are you telling me that less than 1,000 people are the cause of most ofthe govt budget woes, people starving, homeless , and any other problems that YOU, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani can fabricate. This is a total lie that dems and dem socialists - NO difference- dream up to try and PUNISH success.
You could confiscate all of the billionaires money and still would not make any difference in peoples lives. Who is going to manage that money: the people who took it or the people who made it?
Lol. I feel dumber for having read this.
 

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,359
18,381
113
I understand your thinking, but there are a few on this thread who are concerned about paying in to social security...you're espousing higher taxes for healthcare and counting the $10,000 you'll pay because we don't have universal healthcare. Are you positive your taxes won't go up by $20,000 to pay for the universal care? Or are you expecting to save your $10,000 and have someone else pay for the healthcare?
Yes I’m positive. JFC we can’t have nice things because of fearmongers like yourself. Wealthiest country in the world can’t afford it. Everyone else but us. Stop being ridiculous. Again, big pharma and insurance companies thank you for carrying their water. Dumbest country in the world. Nobody would trade with us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,359
18,381
113
Not sure a doctor is needed to correct the fatness. Maybe if they hand out GLP-1s? Most just need a lifestyle change including diet and exercise.

I don’t know how much my taxes would go up to pay for universal healthcare. I can’t imagine it will be less than I pay for coverage today though. I also suspect the universal coverage will have limitations and those with means will still need to buy supplemental coverage.

I do know removing the SS cap would cost me tens of thousands and I’ll likely still face means testing on the benefit in retirement. Just a horrible deal.
It won’t be more. Why are you so afraid to do something that even freaking China can pull off with their billion citizens? Our taxes aren’t going up 10 grand per person. Stop sending our money overseas, wasting it on bs wars, etc. Stop the billionaires from skirting taxes.
 

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,359
18,381
113
This blaming the billionaires is so stupid and disingenuous, because there are less than 1,000 billionaires in this country. Are you telling me that less than 1,000 people are the cause of most ofthe govt budget woes, people starving, homeless , and any other problems that YOU, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani can fabricate. This is a total lie that dems and dem socialists - NO difference- dream up to try and PUNISH success.
You could confiscate all of the billionaires money and still would not make any difference in peoples lives. Who is going to manage that money: the people who took it or the people who made it?
Billionaires thank you. Idiocy.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,855
22,548
113
It won’t be more. Why are you so afraid to do something that even freaking China can pull off with their billion citizens? Our taxes aren’t going up 10 grand per person. Stop sending our money overseas, wasting it on bs wars, etc. Stop the billionaires from skirting taxes.

How do you know taxes aren’t going up 10 grand? Just the SS cap removal proposed ITT would raise my taxes that much several times over.

Propose something for the billionaires and leave hardworking families out of your tax grab.
 

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,113
5,268
113
Yes I’m positive. JFC we can’t have nice things because of fearmongers like yourself. Wealthiest country in the world can’t afford it. Everyone else but us. Stop being ridiculous. Again, big pharma and insurance companies thank you for carrying their water. Dumbest country in the world. Nobody would trade with us.
you do know the wealthiest country is the world is also one of the most in debt. We're $40 trillion, and counting, in debt.

Can we have universal healthcare? Sure we can. Is every American going to pay for it through higher taxes? you bet!

But no problem, you want national healthcare, go for it.
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,001
5,828
113
Imagine how much money you would have if that same contribution - plus your 6.2% employer match - had been invested in a brokerage account in the market earning compound returns.

Yeah, if only someone would have suggested this...
Dance George GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotchtiger

THE_DEVIL

All-American
Dec 16, 2022
4,251
9,034
113
This blaming the billionaires is so stupid and disingenuous, because there are less than 1,000 billionaires in this country. Are you telling me that less than 1,000 people are the cause of most ofthe govt budget woes, people starving, homeless , and any other problems that YOU, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani can fabricate. This is a total lie that dems and dem socialists - NO difference- dream up to try and PUNISH success.
You could confiscate all of the billionaires money and still would not make any difference in peoples lives. Who is going to manage that money: the people who took it or the people who made it?
 

THE_DEVIL

All-American
Dec 16, 2022
4,251
9,034
113
This blaming the billionaires is so stupid and disingenuous, because there are less than 1,000 billionaires in this country. Are you telling me that less than 1,000 people are the cause of most ofthe govt budget woes, people starving, homeless , and any other problems that YOU, AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Mamdani can fabricate. This is a total lie that dems and dem socialists - NO difference- dream up to try and PUNISH success.
You could confiscate all of the billionaires money and still would not make any difference in peoples lives. Who is going to manage that money: the people who took it or the people who made it?
Wealth Inequality in America
 

Fac

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2001
1,761
1,973
113
Oh, I think we have a major problem brewing. The boomers created this problem and they need to feel some pain in solving it, not just getting the Millennials to kick in more money on top of the debt burden we already have.
How did the boomers create this problem%? We have contributed what we were told to contribute. Maybe the politicians should have kept their fingers out of the cookie jar. Maybe instead of funding Ukraine and Isreal we could pump a couple million into SS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman

WDDT

Heisman
Jan 3, 2023
10,966
11,753
113
SS needs to die a quick death. Any other organization attempting to sell SS as a long term investment product would be shut down for being a pyramid scheme. ( Fraud) it quite literally relies on every generation contributing more than the one they are replacing and gives a fraction of the returns. It’s a pyramid. **** FDR in his royal *******.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotchtiger

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,530
5,857
113
How did the boomers create this problem%? We have contributed what we were told to contribute. Maybe the politicians should have kept their fingers out of the cookie jar. Maybe instead of funding Ukraine and Isreal we could pump a couple million into SS.
Who voted for those politicians?
 

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,359
18,381
113
you do know the wealthiest country is the world is also one of the most in debt. We're $40 trillion, and counting, in debt.

Can we have universal healthcare? Sure we can. Is every American going to pay for it through higher taxes? you bet!

But no problem, you want national healthcare, go for it.
So we’re the only country with debt? Stop thinking every American’s taxes are going to go up past the cost of what we already pay for healthcare. Only country in the world because people like you are afraid.
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,855
22,548
113
So we’re the only country with debt? Stop thinking every American’s taxes are going to go up past the cost of what we already pay for healthcare. Only country in the world because people like you are afraid.

Of course not every American. There are a ton of people who barely pay income taxes.

But the people already paying the lions share of taxes will undoubtedly have substantial increases.

Estimates are that we need an ADDITIONAL $1.5-3 TRILLION in annual tax revenue to fund UHC. An average family only pays around $6850 out of pocket for healthcare premiums. And many will still likely need to purchase supplemental coverage on top of UHC to match their private coverage. The math doesn’t math.

Then what happens to the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people employed by insurance companies? What happens to billions and billions of shareholder value in these companies? What happens with physician wait times? What happens to physician and innovation incentives (ie high comp drives investment and talent)? Etc etc.

This is far more complex than you make it out to be. But for a modest earner with minimal tax consequence- sure, it’s a simple thing for you to want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rifler

Tom Paris

Heisman
Oct 1, 2001
143,359
18,381
113
Of course not every American. There are a ton of people who barely pay income taxes.

But the people already paying the lions share of taxes will undoubtedly have substantial increases.

Estimates are that we need an ADDITIONAL $1.5-3 TRILLION in annual tax revenue to fund UHC. An average family only pays around $6850 out of pocket for healthcare premiums. And many will still likely need to purchase supplemental coverage on top of UHC to match their private coverage. The math doesn’t math.

Then what happens to the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people employed by insurance companies? What happens to billions and billions of shareholder value in these companies? What happens with physician wait times? What happens to physician and innovation incentives (ie high comp drives investment and talent)? Etc etc.

This is far more complex than you make it out to be. But for a modest earner with minimal tax consequence- sure, it’s a simple thing for you to want.
Again, it’s weird how everyone can pull this off. We enjoy getting screwed, apparently. Yes it’s a massive undertaking but stop acting like it’s not affordable. Close loopholes for billionaires. Tax them. Stop wasting our tax dollars on stupid stuff Trump wants. Stop wasting it on wars. Sending money to other countries. If you think our taxes are going to go up higher than what insurance companies and big pharma steals from us now then we will continue to get screwed. Chicken s h i t $.
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,119
17,725
113
No, I haven’t gotten mine. I am 42. I am going to have to pay more now to keep the system going and pay for other peoples retirement. No, I don’t want to do that. Retirement is not a biblical principle, and I don’t trust the government to use the money wisely.
I get where you are coming from. But the answer is to fix the government part (MAYBE... stop congress from dipping into the Social Security Fund in the first place), not punish people who have paid in their whole lives expecting a certain income.
 

NoPuntsNoPeace

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
1,386
3,374
113
SS needs to die a quick death. Any other organization attempting to sell SS as a long term investment product would be shut down for being a pyramid scheme. ( Fraud) it quite literally relies on every generation contributing more than the one they are replacing and gives a fraction of the returns. It’s a pyramid. **** FDR in his royal *******.
YES! We are the LAZIEST country in the world. No one wants to work anymore and it’s all due to social security and this very DANGEROUS and SOCIALIST idea of retirement!!! MAGA!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hopefultiger13

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,530
5,857
113
I get where you are coming from. But the answer is to fix the government part (MAYBE... stop congress from dipping into the Social Security Fund in the first place), not punish people who have paid in their whole lives expecting a certain income.
So we punish those that are still working vs punishing the people who allowed the government to dip into Social Security and run up a $30 trillion debt?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopefultiger13

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,530
5,857
113
Again, it’s weird how everyone can pull this off. We enjoy getting screwed, apparently. Yes it’s a massive undertaking but stop acting like it’s not affordable. Close loopholes for billionaires. Tax them. Stop wasting our tax dollars on stupid stuff Trump wants. Stop wasting it on wars. Sending money to other countries. If you think our taxes are going to go up higher than what insurance companies and big pharma steals from us now then we will continue to get screwed. Chicken s h i t $.
What loopholes should we close? Taxing unrealized wealth is not the answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cpahawk

NoPuntsNoPeace

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2025
1,386
3,374
113
Is retirement a right?
Absolutely not. We are not out here for a life of leisure, but for productivity.

All of the issues in our country can be traced back to the formation of the welfare state (Medicare and social security) and the advent of the five day work week.

it made Americans SOFT!
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,119
17,725
113
I would argue that things weren’t bad before Social Security was started. It forced people to really be accountable to their fellow man.
I'm not saying that people should be accountable b/c they should. BUT that being said, you are wrong on the "things weren't that bad before Social Security" part. Here you go:


Key points here... Before the SS act was passed, half of all seniors lived in extreme poverty once they couldn't work. That's hardly "not bad".
 

kidmike41

All-American
Dec 29, 2005
3,530
5,857
113

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,113
5,268
113
What loopholes should we close? Taxing unrealized wealth is not the answer.
I know it's just me, apparently, but I don't get why there is a faction so hung up on billionaires. Both parties have made the tax laws and so far the majority of our elected officials seem happy with the tax code...if there is a billionaire who is violating the code, prosecute them. But, again so far, I get the opportunity for the same loopholes as they do.

Yea, a billionaire has more money than I do...but I didn't start Tesla or Google or Microsoft, Amazon, citadel or any of the other companies. They hire hundreds of thousand of employees, make products that benefit all of us, pay federal state and local taxes, make charitable contributions....and get disparaged
 

scotchtiger

Heisman
Dec 15, 2005
134,855
22,548
113
Again, it’s weird how everyone can pull this off. We enjoy getting screwed, apparently. Yes it’s a massive undertaking but stop acting like it’s not affordable. Close loopholes for billionaires. Tax them. Stop wasting our tax dollars on stupid stuff Trump wants. Stop wasting it on wars. Sending money to other countries. If you think our taxes are going to go up higher than what insurance companies and big pharma steals from us now then we will continue to get screwed. Chicken s h i t $.

"Pull this off" is relative. If given the choice, are you going to get heart surgery in Congo or Uzbekistan or the USA? You noted that all countries in the World Cup offer universal health care....

The USA has the highest quality surgeons and procedures in the world. Our model has created the most innovation and the highest incentive for the best and brightest to pursue medicine.

Sticking with just the EU, the average effective tax rate for income + SS is ~39%. There is an ADDITIONAL ~22% average VAT tax.

In the US, that same tax rate is around 21% and there is no national VAT, though there are state and local taxes.

There is a MASSIVE difference in taxes paid between these countries and the USA. So to be like "everyone else," we would need to:

  • Accept a reduction in care quality
  • Accept a slowing of medical innovation
  • Many would need to accept longer wait times for visits and procedures
  • Accept substantially higher taxes

I'm sorry, but I have no interest in being like "everyone else."
 

Rifler

All-American
Jan 26, 2011
5,001
5,828
113
the government has decided that you're not smart enough to save/plan for your own retirement...Problem is, in the case of a large segment of our population, they're right.

That's a given,... Unfortunate part is that the government has also proven itself not smart enough to plan for our retirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kidmike41

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,119
17,725
113
YES! We are the LAZIEST country in the world. No one wants to work anymore and it’s all due to social security and this very DANGEROUS and SOCIALIST idea of retirement!!! MAGA!
Dude! The French, Spanish, and Italians ALL say hello.

Annual Hours: The average American works roughly 1,811 hours per year. This outpaces peers in Japan (~1,632), the UK (~1,532), and Germany (~1,341)

Time Off: The U.S. is the only advanced economy in the world with no federally mandated paid time off (PTO). This lack of legal requirements forces U.S. workers to rely on employer policies, leading to significantly fewer days off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoPuntsNoPeace

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
7,113
5,268
113
Dude! The French, Spanish, and Italians ALL say hello.

Annual Hours: The average American works roughly 1,811 hours per year. This outpaces peers in Japan (~1,632), the UK (~1,532), and Germany (~1,341)

Time Off: The U.S. is the only advanced economy in the world with no federally mandated paid time off (PTO). This lack of legal requirements forces U.S. workers to rely on employer policies, leading to significantly fewer days off.
According to the OECD Average Annual Wages data, average wages differ significantly across these countries due to varying economic scales, tax systems, and purchasing power: [1]
  • United States: ~\(\$75,000 - \$80,000+\)
  • Germany: ~\(\$68,000+\) (\(\sim \)€66,700)
  • Italy: ~\(\$50,500\) (\(\sim \)€36,500)
  • Spain: ~\(\$54,400\) (\(\sim \)€32,600) [1, 2, 3]
These figures are adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), reflecting actual buying power to make the comparison more accurate. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Breakdown by Country
United States
  • Average Salary: \(\sim \$80,000\) to \(\$83,000\) annually
  • Notes: The U.S. generally reports the highest gross nominal salaries among major global economies, though this is partially offset by higher out-of-pocket healthcare and living costs. [1, 2]
Germany
  • Average Salary: \(\sim \$68,104\) (approx. €66,700) annually
  • Notes: Leads the major economies in Europe, offering robust labor protections and high productivity, though subject to progressive income tax rates. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Italy
  • Average Salary: \(\sim \$50,514\) (approx. €36,500) annually
  • Notes: Does not have a statutory minimum wage; workers rely heavily on collective bargaining agreements which has historically kept wage growth slower than in northern Europe. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Spain
  • Average Salary: \(\sim \$54,460\) (approx. €32,600) annually
  • Notes: Gross salaries are comparatively lower, but Spain offsets this with more moderate living costs and a lower Cost of Living Level in most regions compared to the U.S. or Germany. [1, 2, 3]
 

Attachments

  • 1782327588407.png
    1782327588407.png
    796 bytes · Views: 0
  • 1782327588459.png
    1782327588459.png
    940 bytes · Views: 0
  • 1782327588566.png
    1782327588566.png
    682 bytes · Views: 0
  • 1782327588510.png
    1782327588510.png
    716 bytes · Views: 0
  • 1782327588618.png
    1782327588618.png
    16.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 1782327588669.png
    1782327588669.png
    742 bytes · Views: 0
  • 1782327588721.png
    1782327588721.png
    17.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 1782327588772.png
    1782327588772.png
    656 bytes · Views: 0

Fac

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2001
1,761
1,973
113
I'm 69, so I've been paying into Social Security a whole lot longer than you. (I elected to defer taking any Social Security payments until I reach 70, because I get a bit more per month by waiting.) I fully anticipate and expect to receive Social Security payments starting next year. You can be opposed to it, but you will be outvoted on that, so you should prepare yourself for that disappointment.

Means testing Social Security would turn it into welfare, and effectively kill it. I paid in, so I expect something back. Means testing could mean I get nothing back. That just doesn't work.

Increasing the cap for FICA withholding seems to be the most viable solution. That, and perhaps raising the age for eligibility to receive Social Security payments by a year or two at most. That is less palatable, but possible if raising the cap will not get it done. Even a relatively modest increase in the cap will produce a ginormous amount of additional revenue. The Congress has got to stop raiding Social Security in each year's budget.
Bear, we're almost brothers from different mothers. Think about that. I'll be 69 in August and just started SS in May. Retiring in late August right after turning 69 so I'll be able to spend more time here keeping you in your space. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LafayetteBear