Greg: Omaha Bound, Seeking More

Heelium1

Senior
Aug 6, 2025
368
412
63
Good article.

ETA: My bad: Only once as a No. 5 Seed (or better) did we reach the finals. But, of course, we have reached the finals twice. The first time was in 2006, as a "Darkhorse," fresh from an "upset" sweep in the Tuscaloosa Super Regional.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GregBarnes

uncjhodges

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2025
1,503
4,168
113
Good article.

ETA: My bad: Only once as a No. 5 Seed (or better) did we reach the finals. But, of course, we have reached the finals twice. The first time was in 2006, as a "Darkhorse," fresh from an "upset" sweep in the Tuscaloosa Super Regional.

Ostensibly, we were the 13 seed (though they only seeded 1-8 then)
 

HudcoTrucking

Senior
Aug 1, 2025
413
555
63
It's amazing to see all these factors come together to produce the kind of result as the final super regional game.

11 strike outs (from a freshman who could still be in high school) , 4 doubles by one player, great fielding plays all over the field and successful coaching moves time after time came together for a series win.

You can see why this sort of outcome doesn't happen very often.
 

Heelium1

Senior
Aug 6, 2025
368
412
63
Ostensibly, we were the 13 seed (though they only seeded 1-8 then)
I went to Tuscaloosa in 2006. Assuming that both teams played to their potential, Carolina was a good deal better at nearly every position than the Tide. The Heels, however, got little national respect because of the ACC's dismal showing in 2005.

Alabama's program crashed after that defeat, and it has been largely irrelevant since then--until this year.

The ACC, with younger players coming into their own, stormed into the 2006 CWS, placing four teams in the event: Carolina, Clemson, Ga Tech and Miami. That was a heady time for the ACC because each of the four teams had earned its way to Omaha.

And it was a time of reflection for the SEC. Determined never to see an encore of ACC prominence, in a sport that ESPN had brought wide acclaim by featuring teams like LSU and Miss State, the SEC made structural and financial changes to reassert its dominance.

The NCAA "Baseball Committee" had always been susceptible to political influence. The ascendency of certain baseball programs can readily be traced to the periods of their representation on that committee. IMO, ESPN and the SEC pulled out all of the stops to make the current "Committee" basically a "vassal state" for the SEC, and they have surely succeeded.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pogo_ka

Southern01

Junior
Jul 23, 2025
248
245
43
I went to Tuscaloosa in 2006. Assuming that both teams played to their potential, Carolina was a good deal better at nearly every position than the Tide. The Heels, however, got little national respect because of the ACC's dismal showing in 2005.

Alabama's program crashed after that defeat, and it has been largely irrelevant since then--until this year.

The ACC, with younger players coming into their own, stormed into the 2006 CWS, placing four teams in the event: Carolina, Clemson, Ga Tech and Miami. That was a heady time for the ACC because each of the four teams had earned its way to Omaha.

And it was a time of reflection for the SEC. Determined never to see an encore of ACC prominence, in a sport that ESPN had brought wide acclaim by featuring teams like LSU and Miss State, the SEC made structural and financial changes to reassert its dominance.

The NCAA "Baseball Committee" had always been susceptible to political influence. The ascendency of certain baseball programs can readily be traced to the periods of their representation on that committee. IMO, ESPN and the SEC pulled out all of the stops to make the current "Committee" basically a "vassal state" for the SEC, and they have surely succeeded.
basically a "vassal state" for the SEC, and they have succeeded.

Could not agree more.