Google. Definitely looks like current JR hockey practices will be an issue. hockey may need an exception. There does not seem to be much impact as most sports.
Five in Five - What Might That Look Like?
- Thread starter Wrestleknownothing
- Start date
Within 5 years the written exceptions will fill a book.
Why didn’t they just leave it alone? Who are they trying to appease? You go to school and graduate in 4 yrs, maybe five. CoVid is over. You get 5 yrs to compete 4. What was f’ing wrong with that. College sports is a mess an absolute mess. I have completely lost interest in it. It’s sad.
Medical RS were allowing guys to stay 6-8 years
Eliminate Olympic and medical redshirts. Simplify a lot of things.
+1 creates hard and fast rules. With NIL, NCAA is getting sued by countless athletes each off-season for more eligibility; this essentially kills that.
Cowards… save college sports! Set up “minor” leagues like Baseball. You looking for an education and some money, go to college. You want $$$ and just to play ball, go minor leagues.. insane. The NBA and NFL model (pay rookies on potential not performance) kills the sport as we knew it.
How will you convince pro leagues to take on the expense of building a minor league system when they get it for free now? And that would only apply to basketball and football. Not gonna do a thing for any other sport. Lupert, Nicolls, and Richison are gonna keep doing what they do.
I agree in theory, that minor leagues would solve this issue. But, as you said, NFL and NBA have zero incentive to invest in such a thing and it would completely kill the other sports. There's too much money in the current system for anything to really change.
The NBA has a minor league -- the Developmental League.
It contributes next to nothing -- an occasional last man on the bench -- because the NBA's salary structure (salary cap + guaranteed contracts) only enables development on the fringes.
At college “enrollment” IF they alter the proposed rule.
The next meeting of the D1 Cabinet is Tuesday - Wednesday next week. Perhaps they will vote on the modified 5 in 5 proppsal.
www.ncaa.org
DI Cabinet modifies age-based eligibility concept - NCAA.org
The Division I Cabinet on Friday continued to discuss elements of the age-based eligibility model that could be considered for a formal vote as early as the end
www.ncaa.org
News story on the approval:
t.co
NCAA approves landmark age-based eligibility model
The NCAA Division I Cabinet has unanimously voted to approve the age-based eligibility model, sources tell On3.
Not sure why anyone would say I will take 4 years over having 5.
Will the Mormon religion get a bunch of new members with the mission being to train at an RTC
Military and religious missions are exempt
Yeah, me neither. I’m sure there’s a lawsuit reason that’s in there but yeah, can’t think of why someone would use it.Not sure why anyone would say I will take 4 years over having 5.
Will the Mormon religion get a bunch of new members with the mission being to train at an RTC
Military and religious missions are exempt
Nah. Would have already been a problem. Mormon church plays no games with missions. You're going away and you're doing the work.
And most churches would be loathe to do something like that, as it could jeopardize their tax-exempt status.
Plus - why do that when you can still do a prep year?
+1 I know dozens of BYU (or committed to BYU) football players who went on missions. They got just as much "p-day" time as everyone else. Their allowed "training" was pickup basketball once a week at the local church and maybe some pushups first thing in the morning. Religious service may become a loophole, but it's unlikely to come in the form of LDS missions.
They’re more likely to get an intestinal parasite than they are bigger and stronger due to extra training time
I just used that religion because it's the common one where missions happen.
Any religion gets an exemption. That loophole will be interesting.
NCAA approves landmark age-based eligibility model
The NCAA Division I Cabinet has unanimously voted to approve the age-based eligibility model, sources tell On3.
Not if they haven't turned 19. They made a subtle change to the proposal a little while ago to have it start with enrollment, rather than year after graduation, or year after 19th birthday - whichever comes first.
Nope.
They changed the wording. eligibility starts when you enroll in college OR the fall after you turn 19.
Hockey, armed forces schools pushed back on original wording.
Plus you have the mega rich, who like to let kids take a year sabbatical and actual, real prep schools.
Attorneys plan to sue NCAA over age-based eligibility changes, lack of grandfathering clause
Attorneys plan to file legal challenges after the NCAA approved its new age-based eligibility model Tuesday, according to On3's Pete Nakos.
Could affect Levi if suit wins...
People will stop holding kids back now and use those years later
My guess is he's done and wouldn't come back regardlessAttorneys plan to sue NCAA over age-based eligibility changes, lack of grandfathering clause
Attorneys plan to file legal challenges after the NCAA approved its new age-based eligibility model Tuesday, according to On3's Pete Nakos.www.on3.com
Could affect Levi if suit wins...
For guys who are not yet 19 yes they could do a gap year. It's gonna stop parents from holding kids back
Jayden could greyshirt, he's only 17.
Raney's are both 19 presently and could not grey shirt.