The one 4Afan posted is the regular cover and the Iceman one is the special edition, whatever that means.They should have went with the Iceman one I saw
The one 4Afan posted is the regular cover and the Iceman one is the special edition, whatever that means.They should have went with the Iceman one I saw
They should have used a different player.They should have went with the Iceman one I saw
it means "give me more money for a slightly different cover"The one 4Afan posted is the regular cover and the Iceman one is the special edition, whatever that means.
Welcome to the 2033 IHSA State Football Championship in Hammond, Indiana!We are the Pride and Joy NEAR Illinois Chicago Bears, Bear down!
Honestly, I still don't trust it
Tough to get any kind of a deal when Illinois refuses to even bring it to a vote.I agree. Sorta feels like the are using Hammond as leverage to get the best deal in Arlington Heights.
Everyone is in full CYA. Don't want to be a politician on duty when the Bears leave, but also don't want to be the politician who allowed the Bears to essentially not pay any taxes.Tough to get any kind of a deal when Illinois refuses to even bring it to a vote.
Kevin Warren says Chicago not an option but then it comes out Bears had 5-6 meetings with city after he says that. Then city delegation decides to be a no vote. This is on both parties. And Hammond is leverage that would be their worst case scenario or it would be 100%, any idiot can see that. The Bears keep dangling the carrot even after saying they voted to advance Hammond project. It is pure armature hour on both sides.Tough to get any kind of a deal when Illinois refuses to even bring it to a vote.
How are they still dangling the carrot? They voted to move forward with Hammond last week, the meetings with the city were prior to that.Kevin Warren says Chicago not an option but then it comes out Bears had 5-6 meetings with city after he says that. Then city delegation decides to be a no vote. This is on both parties. And Hammond is leverage that would be their worst case scenario or it would be 100%, any idiot can see that. The Bears keep dangling the carrot even after saying they voted to advance Hammond project. It is pure armature hour on both sides.
Kevin Warren told both State Sen. Bill Cunningham and State Rep. Kam Buckner either before they released the statement or right after "he looks forward to continued discussions with the state". Maybe both Cunningham and Buckner are lying, I guess that is an option but I seriously doubt it.How are they still dangling the carrot? They voted to move forward with Hammond last week, the meetings with the city were prior to that.
Also, those "meetings" with the city were phone calls and zoom meetings, never anything serious. If the city delegation said no then why does the mayor keep saying the city is still the best option?
Why is Hammond the worst case scenario? They're willing to give the Bears what they want, they will get to keep all revenue from games and events, and it will benefit the players in terms of the amount of income tax they will have to pay in Indiana vs. Illinois.
I see what you're saying, but to me this is just the Bears not burning all their bridges. Gotta keep every option open until something is signed and money starts changing hands. It would be bad business to do otherwise.Kevin Warren told both State Sen. Bill Cunningham and State Rep. Kam Buckner either before they released the statement or right after "he looks forward to continued discussions with the state". Maybe both Cunningham and Buckner are lying, I guess that is an option but I seriously doubt it.
If Chicago was a flat out "No" as the Bears have said repeatedly, then why are they still having meetings when you know a vote is coming? It sends mixed messages and Chicago delegation should look out for Chicago and if the Bears are still having discussions, no matter how small, it causes confusion and hope. Bears know what state they are dealing with here...come on.
Maybe "worst case" was bad use of words. It certainly was not their first option or second. Players will pay 1.8% less in state income tax for games played in IN.
I want to be clear, IL lawmakers have fumbled this, no doubt. But the Bears have as well. It is clear they want a Kansas v Missouri situation here, or they would put it to bed and sign on the dotted line with IN. They want to stay in IL, it is obvious. Doesn't mean it is going to happen but I will believe they are moving to a new stadium when construction begins. This whole thing has been a circus.