The scale of this President's Corruption

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113

Hunter got way more than that as did his dad, 50k was just his salary per month for a no-show job just to buy influence to his dad the POTUS. He made way more in other kickbacks as did "the big guy" and lets not get started on all the money from China and other countries. Are you stating these people made money from Gov contracts like the others or did they do it legit? As I recall Barron made most of his money in crypto...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113
where you at fatpussy?


You mean he's doing what congress has been doing for decades that you people defended? How dare he act like your Gods that you worship and defend. Does he really think he can pull an Omar, AOC. or a Pelosi and get away with it like they have? You got him now. So any proof for these claims or are they just more claims without proof? I know there is some panic on the left now about the midterms as the right has started doing like the dems have been for decades. Lets pass the Save Act and finish this...
 
Last edited:

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113

I know nobody bats an eye at the corruption oozing out of this White House anymore, but that’s ******* insane, and we shouldn’t ignore it.

lol the left hates him and he wont win his primary. This is what happens when you dont agree with the leftist cult on every issue including killing conservatives. Dont need to offer him money. This is just cope by the left....
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,251
4,627
113
This a question specific to him or to the broader board? I ask bc there are MAGA folks on here who spam post absolute nonsense at o dark thirty. Just making sure we are questioning/holding everyone to the same standard.
I posted directly to dpic only because in my mind he is the king of these reposts....most of the time, I've never heard of the people who make the original posts.

Now having said that there are others who do the same thing, but can't hold a candle to dpic's capabilities - and I'm not saying that perjoritively.

If intelligent people haven't learned by now not to put 100% stock in what's posted on the internet...then ...
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
I posted directly to dpic only because in my mind he is the king of these reposts....most of the time, I've never heard of the people who make the original posts.

Now having said that there are others who do the same thing, but can't hold a candle to dpic's capabilities - and I'm not saying that perjoritively.

If intelligent people haven't learned by now not to put 100% stock in what's posted on the internet...then ...
Why does it only matter when I post tweets from people you don't know, when there are others who do the same? But to answer your question, yes, many of them are people who I follow but not all of them, but just because you don't know who they are doesn't mean the information they share is wrong. And unlike all the nuts on the right who spam this board, I care if what I'm sharing is true, they don't. Why aren't you picking them apart?
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
lol the left hates him and he wont win his primary. This is what happens when you dont agree with the leftist cult on every issue including killing conservatives. Dont need to offer him money. This is just cope by the left....
There's an organization out there that can help you before it's too late. Please listen and take their stories under advisement before you destroy your life, more than you already have.

 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
Now he's even threatening volunteer poll workers who are just doing their civic duty. Don't tell me he's not a dictator.

RED FLAG: The Trump Justice Department has demanded the identities of every worker who staffed the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia, according to court records reviewed by NYT.

The demand targets employees of Fulton County elections as well as volunteer poll workers, who likely numbered in the thousands during the 2020 election.




“Its purpose is to target, harass, and punish the President’s perceived political opponents,” the county’s motion stated.
The county board argued that the subpoena “cannot yield any evidence that could result in a criminal prosecution” because, among other things, the statutes of limitations have expired “for any purported 2020 election crimes.”

The county also asserted that the subpoena requires the disclosure of names, positions, email addresses and personal telephone numbers for ten categories of Fulton County election workers.

At a time when “election workers fear for their personal safety,” it would apply to volunteers, temporary poll workers and even bus drivers who operated a mobile voting location, the county filing stated.

Lauren Groh-Wargo, who leads Fair Fight Action, a left-leaning voting rights organization, said election workers across the country are facing increased threats and harassment.

“Roughly a third of election officials are threatened on the job, and more than half worry it’s making it harder to hire and keep election workers,” Ms. Groh-Wargo said in a statement on Monday. “They’re trying to break our democracy by attacking the infrastructure, but we are fighting back hard.”
 
Last edited:

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,708
20,040
113
do you actually follow all these people who you repost or do you search for posts that support your positions?

I've never heard of these people who you repost...am I living in a shell?
Without meaning to be rude, its the shell one. Not because you should know these specific people, but just because it is how algorithms work. I follow like 5 people on threads (similar to twitter), but I have a huge feed of posts to review. I see those 5 among them, but see a lot more. Some that are posting things I agree with, or sharing information like what I've stopped and reviewed previously (the algorithm knows I spent time previously so gives me more). Then it will occasionally give me posts the opposite of my regular stuff that I assume it thinks I will get angry about and want to engage. So dpic likely doesn't follow the great majority of the people he posts (likely does some of them) but they are on his feed, he finds it good information or perspective, so he shares. Would guess it is the same with all the RW posters here. Their feeds are tailored to them and what will keep them coming back to the app or site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigres88 and dpic73

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
9,708
20,040
113
Hunter got way more than that as did his dad, 50k was just his salary per month for a no-show job just to buy influence to his dad the POTUS. He made way more in other kickbacks as did "the big guy" and lets not get started on all the money from China and other countries. Are you stating these people made money from Gov contracts like the others or did they do it legit? As I recall Barron made most of his money in crypto...
So Comer and the Republicans spent all that time investigating and I assume you think are also corrupt? That is why there were no charges?
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
Without meaning to be rude, its the shell one. Not because you should know these specific people, but just because it is how algorithms work. I follow like 5 people on threads (similar to twitter), but I have a huge feed of posts to review. I see those 5 among them, but see a lot more. Some that are posting things I agree with, or sharing information like what I've stopped and reviewed previously (the algorithm knows I spent time previously so gives me more). Then it will occasionally give me posts the opposite of my regular stuff that I assume it thinks I will get angry about and want to engage. So dpic likely doesn't follow the great majority of the people he posts (likely does some of them) but they are on his feed, he finds it good information or perspective, so he shares. Would guess it is the same with all the RW posters here. Their feeds are tailored to them and what will keep them coming back to the app or site.
Correct but as for the post he responded to, he is someone I follow but it wasn't about him. He was commenting on a Politico article that he was sharing, which should have been the focus, not the X account.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UrHuckleberry

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113
Now he's even threatening volunteer poll workers who are just doing their civic duty. Don't tell me he's not a dictator.

RED FLAG: The Trump Justice Department has demanded the identities of every worker who staffed the 2020 election in Fulton County, Georgia, according to court records reviewed by NYT.

The demand targets employees of Fulton County elections as well as volunteer poll workers, who likely numbered in the thousands during the 2020 election.




“Its purpose is to target, harass, and punish the President’s perceived political opponents,” the county’s motion stated.
The county board argued that the subpoena “cannot yield any evidence that could result in a criminal prosecution” because, among other things, the statutes of limitations have expired “for any purported 2020 election crimes.”

The county also asserted that the subpoena requires the disclosure of names, positions, email addresses and personal telephone numbers for ten categories of Fulton County election workers.

At a time when “election workers fear for their personal safety,” it would apply to volunteers, temporary poll workers and even bus drivers who operated a mobile voting location, the county filing stated.

Lauren Groh-Wargo, who leads Fair Fight Action, a left-leaning voting rights organization, said election workers across the country are facing increased threats and harassment.

“Roughly a third of election officials are threatened on the job, and more than half worry it’s making it harder to hire and keep election workers,” Ms. Groh-Wargo said in a statement on Monday. “They’re trying to break our democracy by attacking the infrastructure, but we are fighting back hard.”

yep if they broke the law charge them, if they have info interview them...
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113
This is six years later and you're still simping for that sociopath's lies and this time you don't even care if volunteer poll workers are getting harassed. You're a terrible American.
You are still Russia Russia Russia after 10 years so spare me
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
You are still Russia Russia Russia after 10 years so spare me
your delusional beliefs
You are a terrible person if you go along with this and no matter how many unrelated whataboutisms you drag up, the fact remains. You are simping for a lying, treasonous sociopath who can't accept his loss and now you don't even care if some civic minded grannies get harassed by his gestapo. Seek help because you're a pox on this country and you can't be reformed.
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113
You are a terrible person if you go along with this and no matter how many unrelated whataboutisms you drag up, the fact remains. You are simping for a lying, treasonous sociopath who can't accept his loss and now you don't even care if some civic minded grannies get harassed by his gestapo. Seek help because you're a pox on this country and you can't be reformed.
Loss? Try landslide victory and popular vote national champ. Two things other than a deek that you cant keep out of your mouth Brian are the words Russia and Trump. He's in your head. Also Ill agree with you, I cant be brainwashed into leftist think. Im a REAL American native and true, while you side with our enemies to gain political power here like a true leftist...
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
Loss? Try landslide victory and popular vote national champ. Two things other than a deek that you cant keep out of your mouth Brian are the words Russia and Trump. He's in your head...
You're not sane and you don't understand the simplest things. You just want to lick orange taint and you'd twist yourself into a pretzel to absolve him of murder, even if it was your wife, because you're just that sick.

1778035192754.png
 

TigerRagRob

Heisman
Sep 23, 2001
23,091
14,167
113
You're not sane and you don't understand the simplest things. You just want to lick orange taint and you'd twist yourself into a pretzel to absolve him of murder, even if it was your wife, because you're just that sick.

View attachment 1282788
No you are wrong yet again. I want you to go play in traffic or get your 53rd booster. Just looking out for you good buddy. Was fun watching Rachel Wilson blood-eagle you the other day in the debate...
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,251
4,627
113
Why does it only matter when I post tweets from people you don't know, when there are others who do the same? But to answer your question, yes, many of them are people who I follow but not all of them, but just because you don't know who they are doesn't mean the information they share is wrong. And unlike all the nuts on the right who spam this board, I care if what I'm sharing is true, they don't. Why aren't you picking them apart?
If it came across as picking you apart, that certainly was not my intention. Someone posted, as I recall, about reposts, and In my opinion, you are "king" of reposts on this board. There are others some from the right and others from the left that do the same, but no one holds a candle to you. And as I posted I don't say that pejoratively.

And, I agree 100% that just because I don't know who they are, that doesn't mean what they post is wrong....but doesn't necessarily make it right either. One of the things we're supposed to learn in college, and in life for that matter, is to assemble as much data as possible, sort through the wheat and chaff and make your own decisions.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
30,559
23,355
113
If it came across as picking you apart, that certainly was not my intention. Someone posted, as I recall, about reposts, and In my opinion, you are "king" of reposts on this board. There are others some from the right and others from the left that do the same, but no one holds a candle to you. And as I posted I don't say that pejoratively.

And, I agree 100% that just because I don't know who they are, that doesn't mean what they post is wrong....but doesn't necessarily make it right either. One of the things we're supposed to learn in college, and in life for that matter, is to assemble as much data as possible, sort through the wheat and chaff and make your own decisions.
Not sure how you can say with all seriousness that I repost more than Growls does but ok. He overwhelms the board with up to 100 posts a night, the majority of which are misinformation or completely made up.

I share posts that I agree with because it saves time from typing up the same thoughts and the links generally show you a synopsis and a photo that captures the essence of the talking point or attached article. And since most people won't read articles, the links are better at distilling information in a condensed, easy to digest format.

Again, I care if what I'm posting is true and it's why I often also include an article from a credible source that corroborates the post. I'm not like the righties on this board and I understand how to parse the truth from lies, but more importantly, I care that I'm sharing accurate information. You might notice that my posts are rarely disproven but on the rare event that someone calls me out, I will apologize and/or delete the post.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,251
4,627
113
Not sure how you can say with all seriousness that I repost more than Growls does but ok. He overwhelms the board with up to 100 posts a night, the majority of which are misinformation or completely made up.

I share posts that I agree with because it saves time from typing up the same thoughts and the links generally show you a synopsis and a photo that captures the essence of the talking point or attached article. And since most people won't read articles, the links are better at distilling information in a condensed, easy to digest format.

Again, I care if what I'm posting is true and it's why I often also include an article from a credible source that corroborates the post. I'm not like the righties on this board and I understand how to parse the truth from lies, but more importantly, I care that I'm sharing accurate information. You might notice that my posts are rarely disproven but on the rare event that someone calls me out, I will apologize and/or delete the post.
please accept that I'm not trying to disparage your posts. I open pretty much all of them and some - with the reposts - I agree with and some I don't.

Admittedly, I don't count how many reposts you have in comparison with piggy..never occurred to me to do that. Maybe it's just that I pay more attention..

I personally appreciate your reposts...save me time and energy in searching out data...I might disagree with the "credible source" determination, not that they're not credible, but more because I just don't agree with their conclusions. And, that's Ok, two people are allowed to see the same thing and come away with different conclusions.

I've actually learned some things from your posts.
 

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,280
13,039
113
Interesting claim, but like so many claims is there any proof of any broken laws or even if the claim is true? With Biden and Clinton there was a paper trail as well as audio and video proof and the left defended them.
And the Trump Justice Dept has used that "evidence" and prosecuted them to the fullest extent of the law!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

tarheelbybirth1

Heisman
Jul 4, 2025
4,280
13,039
113
Loss? Try landslide victory and popular vote national champ. Two things other than a deek that you cant keep out of your mouth Brian are the words Russia and Trump. He's in your head. Also Ill agree with you, I cant be brainwashed into leftist think. Im a REAL American native and true, while you side with our enemies to gain political power here like a true leftist...
This is truly top-shelf stupidity. Bye bot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,251
4,627
113
Imagine being this dumb..........all it took was Trump saying the same word 3 times for you to believe there was no collusion
"The Mueller investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government, though it did identify "numerous links" between them. Special Counsel Robert Mueller focused on the legal crime of conspiracy rather than the colloquial term "collusion," concluding that there was insufficient evidence to prove a criminal agreement beyond a reasonable doubt"
 

fsu1jreed

Heisman
Apr 1, 2002
8,957
16,749
113
"The Mueller investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government, though it did identify "numerous links" between them. Special Counsel Robert Mueller focused on the legal crime of conspiracy rather than the colloquial term "collusion," concluding that there was insufficient evidence to prove a criminal agreement beyond a reasonable doubt"

The REPUBLICAN senate committee found the Trump Campaign met with Russian officials 119 times, that's multiple times a week........but yea, no collusion


Hey Russia, if you're listening......................
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
6,251
4,627
113
The REPUBLICAN senate committee found the Trump Campaign met with Russian officials 119 times, that's multiple times a week........but yea, no collusion


Hey Russia, if you're listening......................
So, if you had evidence of colussion that Mueller and his team of lawyers couldn't find, maybe you should have given them that information. Or are you just suggesting that the hand picked team was incompetent.

It's really kind of amusing..when Mueller was appointed and picked his team of lawyers, many of whom were democrats, folks on the left seemed to be happy. But, now after mueller puts out his report and can't pinpoint collusion, the same people highlight meetings between russians and trump campaign. Didn't the Mueller team know about those meetings? Didn't they investigate? Yet they couldn't say there was collusion...

I personally didn't know there were 199 meetings and I have even less knowledge about what the conversations entailed. Neither does anybody on this board. So I'm dependent on what the people investigating not only the meetings but also any other discussions determined.

Just to be clear, I'm not defending Trump. I have no idea if he or his campaign colluded with Russia. I only know that the DoJ appointed a respected former FBI director, and this director selected numerous lawyers to conduct an investigation. They did, and they subsequently wrote and released a report. I can only assume, that what they wrote and concluded was accurate.
 
Last edited:

fsu1jreed

Heisman
Apr 1, 2002
8,957
16,749
113
So, if you had evidence of colussion that Mueller and his team of lawyers couldn't find, maybe you should have given them that information. Or are you just suggesting that the hand picked team was incompetent.

LMAO..........definately, definately a cult

Hey, was this you?