How do you think ISU football will be next year?

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
2,177
2,477
113
Regardless of how their year turns out, Iowa has to beat them next year. Definitively. By multiple touchdowns. We must re-establish our dominance against a team that has no identity with players who have never experienced the Cy-Hawk rivalry. Personally, I see this as the most important game of the year because of that, and also where it falls. We have to go into B1G play undefeated if we want a shot at the playoffs.
Does a multiple td win count for more than 1 W?

Does one game re-establish dominance?

But the lack of experience for ISU in the rivalry is a great point. Thank you. You just made me money. I was already looking for investment opportunities on this game. Now, I will be doing so even much more heavily. The sun does shine on a dog's *** from time to time
 
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawk

UIAlumFireFighter

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2018
1,110
1,673
113
Very wrong. It won't be close. If the line is twenty or less, Iowa will cover.
Yeah because we never have a hard time with Iowa State………

But, for some of you, the offseason is definitely the time for endless, unfounded optimism.
 

2D

All-American
Oct 8, 2013
2,618
5,430
113
Anything is possible. Ferentz is 14-12 against four different coaches there. He managed to lose to Chizik in 2007 in a year Clown College went 3-9. He puckers up every year against them.
This is exactly why I have this game as an L until he and Lester can prove they can beat them. That team will have played 1 real game together as a team by the time we play them. For all intents and purposes, we should absolutely dominate the line play, and have Kamari/Phillips run down their throats until they can stop it. But for some reason, Iowa State has been our kyrptonite in virtually every sport. This game has to be where the tide changes. No more losing to that loser school.
 

DShawkeye

Junior
Jan 3, 2023
215
224
43
Some juice is really leaving this game with Matt Campbell gone. I remember the clones trolling hard before the 2017 shootout, the back and forth with Brian Ferentz & clones staff on offers/recruiting, and the stare down across the field from Campbell.

Clones are gonna have to win a game or 2 for that energy to come back, which I'd rather not have
 
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawk

RagnarLothbrok

Heisman
Jun 11, 2025
4,581
13,189
113
The gloom and doom of having nearly their entire roster transfer over to PSU… I think like 54 players? Or will they shock everyone and surprise and be a good team? I think they have an uphill battle (duh) but wanted to see what other Hawkeye fans think?
There are always surprises every season, but nothing on paper suggests Iowa State will be anything but mediocre.

If they win 5 games, they will have had a successful season.
 

RagnarLothbrok

Heisman
Jun 11, 2025
4,581
13,189
113
I expect Iowa States defense to be decent next season as key players from Washington State moved to Ames, and their defense was pretty salty last year. .
tv land lol GIF by nobodies.


They gave up 59 against North Texas and followed that up by giving up another 59 to their intrastate rival.

I’m sure Ole Miss was up for their game in Oxford when WSU only gave up 24 to them (still a great accomplishment, for sure), but beyond that you have a bunch of low-scoring games against mediocre opponents (outside of Ole Miss and Virginia) after giving up 118 points in weeks 3 and 4.

It can be said WSU had a decent defense in 2025 that was ranked just outside of the top 25. But, we get it. In Clown World, that translates to “just as good as any Phil Parker defense.”
 

JerseyCityHawk

All-Conference
Jul 6, 2025
993
1,644
92
See their Oregon st transfer rb just tore his Achilles and article said one of line rb who returned left the team after spring practice. Not good for them
Wow that sucks as I do t wish that upon anyone as I have been there done that- no thanks it’s a grueling injury
 

WeBeHerkin

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2016
4,259
4,933
113

Iowa State AD Jamie Pollard calls out Big Ten, SEC for breaking CSC rules: 'Let them break away'​

Story by Alex Byington
• 2h•
4 min read
1779221274295.png

The rest of college football is getting fed up with the Big Ten and SEC, especially when it comes to how their teams seemingly flout the rules around third-party NIL deals laid out by the new College Sports Commission, created out of last Summer’s House v. NCAA settlement.

Iowa State athletic director Jamie Pollard put his two Power Four conference brethren on blast Monday during a Cyclones Tailgate Tour stop in Des Moines, and even suggested the Big Ten and SEC should follow through of potential threats to “break away” from the NCAA if the leagues don’t want to follow the agreed-upon NIL limits laid out in the House settlement.

“That’s what’s frustrating to me, the same people that say they want rules only want rules if they don’t apply to them,” Pollard said Monday, via Cyclone Fanatic. “I said it three years ago — let ‘em break away. I would turn it around and say we should break away from them. Let them go, but they have to go in all their sports and see how fun it is to play baseball and softball and track when it’s just the 20 of you.

“That’s what I think we should do, but I’m one person, and you know that’s probably a little more draconian. But that’s how I feel about it,” Pollard continued. “Like, let’s quit talking about it, quit threatening, go do it. But if you’re going to do it, you don’t get to just do it in football and then keep all your other sports with us. No, take them all, see how fun it is.”

Pollard’s comments came on the same day the Big Ten Spring Meetings kicked off Monday in Los Angeles, where power brokers within college sports’ wealthiest conference is meeting to discuss prominent topics like future College Football Playoff expansion among other issues.

Pollard’s admitted frustrations with the Big Ten and SEC are rooted in the knowledge some teams within those two leagues are far exceeding the established financial limitations that the CSC has been tasked with enforcing, especially with regard to third-party NIL deals that are allowing some of college football’s biggest brands to field $30-40 million roster budgets. According to On3’s Pete Nakos, more than 20 football teams will field rosters next season valued at $30 million or more, while there are more than 10 basketball teams exceeding $20 million, with much of those hailing from the Big Ten and SEC.

The landmark House settlement, which passed last June, established legal revenue-sharing between schools and student-athletes, but implemented a $20.5 million salary cap for which teams are able to utilize. That cap increased to $21.3 million for the 2026-27 fiscal year, but recent numbers from the CSC itself reveal some teams are more than doubling that total. And while some third-party NIL deals don’t necessarily count against a team’s revenue-share cap, they’re not intended to let teams run up the tab.

“It’s frustrating, because collectively, the four [Power] conferences created the CSC. And we spent a lot of money. The four commissioners spent a lot of money creating the CSC,” Pollard added. “Then to have two of the conferences not want to adhere to it is perplexing to me, because then it’s like why did we spend the money? If you didn’t want rules, then why did you create this entity?”

According to Yahoo! Sports, of the more than $250 million worth of third-party NIL deals submitted to the College Sports Commission since Jan. 1, the Big Ten and SEC accounted for more than 75% of those deals. And while $115 million of that $250 million has has been cleared according to the CSC’s own publicly-released data, “roughly $125 million or more remain under review or have been rejected.”

Last week, an independent arbitrator ruled the CSC properly applied its rules around third-party NIL agreements when it rejected millions in NIL payments meant for a group of 18 Nebraska football players from Playfly, the Cornhuskers’ media rights holder. Playfly had agreed to redirect $10.25 million of its $15-year, $300 million multimedia rights deal signed in 2022 into NIL payments.

“We are pleased with the arbitrator’s decision to affirm the CSC’s fact-based application of the rules,” said College Sports Commission CEO Bryan Seeley in a statement. “This process shows the system is working as intended: a decision we made was challenged and a neutral arbitrator assessed the facts to inform a final decision. We hope and expect that the student-athletes will submit new deals that comply with the rules, so we can promptly review them.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: JerseyCityHawk

Athena45

Redshirt
Aug 19, 2025
40
45
18
The gloom and doom of having nearly their entire roster transfer over to PSU… I think like 54 players? Or will they shock everyone and surprise and be a good team? I think they have an uphill battle (duh) but wanted to see what other Hawkeye fans think?
Who gives a s*** what clones are next year. This board is about Hawkeye football, not ish football!
 

RuggieC

Senior
Mar 30, 2014
427
890
93
tv land lol GIF by nobodies.


They gave up 59 against North Texas and followed that up by giving up another 59 to their intrastate rival.

I’m sure Ole Miss was up for their game in Oxford when WSU only gave up 24 to them (still a great accomplishment, for sure), but beyond that you have a bunch of low-scoring games against mediocre opponents (outside of Ole Miss and Virginia) after giving up 118 points in weeks 3 and 4.

It can be said WSU had a decent defense in 2025 that was ranked just outside of the top 25. But, we get it. In Clown World, that translates to “just as good as any Phil Parker defense.”
lol
 

rchawk

All-American
Oct 27, 2001
74,078
8,453
113
Who gives a s*** what clones are next year. This board is about Hawkeye football, not ish football!
You are correct of course. It's just so much fun when they suck extremely. Their AD is calling for a day when they won't field a major college football team.

It's like watching The Hindenburg but now everybody survives to go on to lesser things.
 
Last edited: