It was nice for 2 femtoseconds. All the trolls but in a different boys hole. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Ugh.
All the dip shi ts are back I see
- Thread starter GOHOX69
- Start date
It was really nice in here for a couple days and now I feel bad about dragging our trash to Clemson.
Interesting ID
I immediately started populating my Ignore list when I joined this board. It's still quite a pleasant experience.
Yeah, it’s too bad. Especially the one who caused all this posting more than anyone else (and playing victim, as usual).
Very pathetic. Their response to every post is “well you support a pedo President”
It’s like having a 100 new Dpink retards running around here
Yep...ignore, early and often
This. The trolls and derpasauruses just get put on ignore for me. Life is good. No one likes a derpasaurus.
He's also a rapist, traitor, serial liar, stupid enough to bankrupt a goddam.n casino, an increasingly beffuded moron and a s.hit human being who mocks the disabled and brags about grabbing women by the p.ussy.
Feel better now?
get a load of the TDS in this limp, holy shitteIs that gonna stop him from being your King the next 2.75 years? I think not
Is that gonna stop him from being your King the next 2.75 years? I think not
It's his fault I'm here.
Trump Defense Syndrome, yes you are textbook.
Is that gonna stop him from being your King the next 2.75 years? I think not
Every single thing I wrote is true and documented.
Is that gonna stop him from being your King the next 2.75 years? I think not
If you disbelieve, you are the deranged one my friend.
Enjoy the 30% Dead Ender Club and being a joke that history will laugh at. Rube and mark.
Bye Felecia. Put me on your list please and I’ll do the same.
I see that blue hair dye has penetrated that pea brain of yours
70% of the country must have blue hair then, Pardner…
Use a Google search buddy.
Convicted rapist? YUP
Bankrupted a Casino? THAT'S A YES!
Traitor? JAN 6 SAYS HI!
Mock the didabled?
Beffudled moron? YOUR EYES DON'T LIE
And **** human being? 50-plus years in the public eye is more than enough proof.
So sorry you were hoodwinked by a rat. That's on you for being dumb, though, at least the second and third time.
Pardner? That must be an Iowa phag thing
Ban bet on if Trump is a “convicted rapist”?
If you puss out, you’re gonna need to sit down and STFU for a couple days,
No, Donald Trump has not been criminally convicted of raping anyone.
The first one, Calm yourself pisspants.
Sure.
Here's the Washington Post article proving it:
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.
Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.
“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.
A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts.
Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
Kaplan also flatly rejected the Trump team’s suggestion that the conduct Trump was found liable for might have been as limited as groping of the breasts.
The reason? Trump was not accused of that, so the only alleged offense that would have qualified as “sexual abuse” was forced digital penetration. Beyond that, Trump was accused of putting his mouth on Carroll’s mouth and pulling down her tights, which Kaplan noted were not treated as alleged sexual abuse at trial.
“The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her ******,” Kaplan wrote, calling it the “only remaining conclusion.”
Kaplan also noted that the verdict form did not ask the jury to decide exactly what conduct Trump had committed, and that neither prosecutors nor Trump’s lawyers had requested it to do so.
“Mr. Trump’s attempt to minimize the sexual abuse finding as perhaps resting on nothing more than groping of Ms. Carroll’s breasts through her clothing is frivolous,” Kaplan wrote.
He added that the jury clearly found that Trump had “ ‘raped’ her in the sense of that term broader than the New York Penal Law definition.”
The motion was a part of Trump’s efforts to appeal the verdict against him. That’s an effort that will apparently continue as he faces a separate defamation lawsuit from Carroll, dealing with claims Trump made about her allegations while he was still president.
But for now, Trump’s effort to push back has led to a rather remarkable clarification that severely undercuts his main talking point.
July 19, 2023
E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.
Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.
“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.
A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts.
Kaplan roundly rejected Trump’s motion Tuesday, calling that argument “entirely unpersuasive.”
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
Kaplan also flatly rejected the Trump team’s suggestion that the conduct Trump was found liable for might have been as limited as groping of the breasts.
The reason? Trump was not accused of that, so the only alleged offense that would have qualified as “sexual abuse” was forced digital penetration. Beyond that, Trump was accused of putting his mouth on Carroll’s mouth and pulling down her tights, which Kaplan noted were not treated as alleged sexual abuse at trial.
“The jury’s finding of sexual abuse therefore necessarily implies that it found that Mr. Trump forcibly penetrated her ******,” Kaplan wrote, calling it the “only remaining conclusion.”
Kaplan also noted that the verdict form did not ask the jury to decide exactly what conduct Trump had committed, and that neither prosecutors nor Trump’s lawyers had requested it to do so.
“Mr. Trump’s attempt to minimize the sexual abuse finding as perhaps resting on nothing more than groping of Ms. Carroll’s breasts through her clothing is frivolous,” Kaplan wrote.
He added that the jury clearly found that Trump had “ ‘raped’ her in the sense of that term broader than the New York Penal Law definition.”
The motion was a part of Trump’s efforts to appeal the verdict against him. That’s an effort that will apparently continue as he faces a separate defamation lawsuit from Carroll, dealing with claims Trump made about her allegations while he was still president.But for now, Trump’s effort to push back has led to a rather remarkable clarification that severely undercuts his main talking point.
SEE YA, Rube, sucker, mark, chump!
If the Tigers were smart, they'd beg Tom to take us back, or ban us. We will just move from planet to plant killing them off in due time. Posters simply cant resist interacting with the trolls.
Last edited:
Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense.
Highlight that sped class.
“Based on the May 2023 and January 2024 civil court verdicts, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, but the jury did not find him liable for rape under New York's strict legal definition. However, the judge in the case later clarified that the sexual abuse found by the jury meets the common, dictionary definition of "rape".Here are the details of the findings:Civil Liability: In a civil trial, a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (specifically sexual battery) and defamation, awarding Carroll millions in damages.Legal Definition: The jury did not find him liable for "rape" as defined by the New York Penal Law, which at the time of the alleged incident required penile penetration.Judge's Clarification: In subsequent rulings, Judge Lewis Kaplan stated that the jury's finding of sexual abuse constitutes rape under common definitions, and that the claim of rape is "substantially true".No Criminal Conviction: Trump has not been convicted of a sex crime in a criminal court, and these verdicts relate to a civil case“
Deuces you blue headed, septum ring having, deranged phaggott
Convicted and judge ruled he's a rapist.“Based on the May 2023 and January 2024 civil court verdicts, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation against E. Jean Carroll, but the jury did not find him liable for rape under New York's strict legal definition. However, the judge in the case later clarified that the sexual abuse found by the jury meets the common, dictionary definition of "rape".Here are the details of the findings:Civil Liability: In a civil trial, a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (specifically sexual battery) and defamation, awarding Carroll millions in damages.Legal Definition: The jury did not find him liable for "rape" as defined by the New York Penal Law, which at the time of the alleged incident required penile penetration.Judge's Clarification: In subsequent rulings, Judge Lewis Kaplan stated that the jury's finding of sexual abuse constitutes rape under common definitions, and that the claim of rape is "substantially true".No Criminal Conviction: Trump has not been convicted of a sex crime in a criminal court, and these verdicts relate to a civil case“
Deuces you blue headed, septum ring having, deranged phaggott
Dude's a rapist.
Hit the bricks, dips.hit.
You voted for a f.ucking perverted rapist racist THREE TIMES.
I hope you don't have a wife or daughter you sick pig.
If there's a Christian God, you are undoubdtedly going to hell. Where all you pervert loving racist pieces of sh.it belong.
Not convicted of rape and as someone who claims to understand the English language you should know the difference.
Reeeeeeeee