Still No. 2 in D1 Top 25

HeelYeah2012

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2025
1,000
2,563
113
West Virginia is a team we don't want to see in our bracket.
Doubt we’ll see them in a regional. They are right in the thick of the hosting conversation now, and with the new bracketing rules, if they fall short of hosting they’ll likely be sent to the #15 or #16 seed or something. No chance they fall so far they come to UNC, since we’ll be the #3-5 seed most likely.
 

heels2012

Senior
Aug 1, 2025
262
771
93
With the transition to seeding the top 32 teams this year, will they still avoid putting teams from same conference in same regional? I assume so but that also means they have flexibility to move teams up and down the seed lines.
 

HeelYeah2012

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2025
1,000
2,563
113
With the transition to seeding the top 32 teams this year, will they still avoid putting teams from same conference in same regional? I assume so but that also means they have flexibility to move teams up and down the seed lines.
Yes, can’t be in the same regional as someone in your conference. The methodology they have in place is placing the teams in 4-team pods. For example, take UCLA. As #1 seed they could get any of the teams seeded #29-32 as their 2 seed, to make everything line up correctly with conferences etc. So while they aren’t guaranteed to get literally #32 as their 2 seed, there’s no way they get like #19 overall or something. Whereas historically geography played such a big role you often saw really unbalanced regionals.
 
Aug 19, 2025
432
813
93
Yes, can’t be in the same regional as someone in your conference. The methodology they have in place is placing the teams in 4-team pods. For example, take UCLA. As #1 seed they could get any of the teams seeded #29-32 as their 2 seed, to make everything line up correctly with conferences etc. So while they aren’t guaranteed to get literally #32 as their 2 seed, there’s no way they get like #19 overall or something. Whereas historically geography played such a big role you often saw really unbalanced regionals.
It’s actually a well-conceived approach…which is saying a lot for the NCAA.
 

uncjhodges

All-Conference
Sep 1, 2025
1,265
3,772
113
Doubt we’ll see them in a regional. They are right in the thick of the hosting conversation now, and with the new bracketing rules, if they fall short of hosting they’ll likely be sent to the #15 or #16 seed or something. No chance they fall so far they come to UNC, since we’ll be the #3-5 seed most likely.
Could see them as our super matchup.
Regional 2 is looking like someone like Tennessee, UCF, Cincinnati right now
 

HeelYeah2012

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2025
1,000
2,563
113
If they can fix the tournament in this way, why haven't they fixed the rule about home vs away? If you are awarded a regional you should be the home team in every game you play.
Clearly the NCAA doesn’t think that’s a rule that needs fixing. It’s a tough one.
 

ColoradoHeel

Senior
Dec 8, 2018
357
420
63
The ncaa needs to quit this regional garbage given most good teams are in the south, thus they stick us with a tough team from NC, VA, SC, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mpaer and JOB1937

nutz4Dheels

Redshirt
Nov 7, 2006
101
27
28
I'd love to get off of that 4/5 line to avoid UCLA and Texas in Omaha. I think we can pitch around UGAs bats similar to what we did with GT.