*****2026-27 Transfer Portal News*****

hawkbr

Senior
Jul 14, 2024
385
915
93
Jan said about the Portal signings: "I hope to have a couple more added next week."

And at the end of the video she said she's looking for few more bodies: "I'm hoping maybe a point guard and then a wing of any sort."

And about signing a big, she said: "They're hard to get with that depth."

 

91hawki

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2022
915
2,529
93
Jan said about the Portal signings: "I hope to have a couple more added next week."

And at the end of the video she said she's looking for few more bodies: "I'm hoping maybe a point guard and then a wing of any sort."

And about signing a big, she said: "They're hard to get with that depth."


A little apprised by the pg comment.
 

KyleHuesmann

Heisman
Staff member
Dec 9, 2022
15,431
44,655
113
I don't think it would necessarily be a PG to come in and play a big role. It would be more about having depth at that position. They already have Carnegie, Wright, Stremlow and Whiting.

I would think that wing addition would be the one that they'd like to have an actual role for, but some of that will depend on who it is.
 

hawkbr

Senior
Jul 14, 2024
385
915
93
Why, we could use a backup PG right?
All the next targets are backups. I think it's perfectly natural for a coach to want to have two true PG on the roster. That's the standard, or even a little more than that. Obviously, this backup PG won't be a threat to Chit Chat, but if she's good enough to play 10 mpg if needed and maintain the level and pace of Chit Chat, that would be great to have that option on the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torgeroni and AFM22

Hawkangler

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
1,675
3,789
113
The only issue with Deal is that people expected her to come in and play like Clark. Addie Deal is a wing, not a PG. She was a top 20 recruit, not a Top 5 recruit.

In WBB, rankings are like earthquakes. With each “tier” of recruit, the magnitude changes. A top 5 player (CC22) is usually a *lot* better than a Top 20 player. A top 20 player (Deal) is usually a *lot* better than a Top 50 player. A top 50 player (Stuelke) is usually quite a bit better than a Top 100 player (McCabe). Take a look at the 2020 HS rankings — we all know the Top 5 players and they all had a lot of success. Outside the Top 5, names become a lot less familiar. Same with the class of 2022 to some extent.

Deal wasn’t stellar as a freshman but she will be a productive player. She can play 1-4. She is 6’0 and can rebound well. Her game is more like Sydney Parrish or Avery Howellthan CC22 or JuJu Watkins. She has a well rounded skillset and a sturdy build as well.

The bottom line is that outside those 5 or so players in each class, no one should be judged by their freshman year. That is rly the only level of player that can come in and take over a Top 15 team as a freshman. I’ll be shocked if she is shooting under 35% from
3 this year. I could see her with a triple double at some point as well.

The real question at this point is whether Woliczko (ranked either 6 or 7 by basically every major ranking service) will be such a player. Hopefully she is one of those few players who can hit the ground running. She might be able to do it with her rebounding (if she can rebound as well as Hannah did as a freshman I’ll be pleased) but ESPN comp’d her game to that of Darianna Littlepage-Buggs at Baylor, who just went undrafted…
So glad we are still talking about deal. Maybe when she's a senior, everyone will stop.
Jake Gyllenhaal Reaction GIF
You like that? Our coaches are all over adding a few more players from the portal. Positions of need, cost and years available are a balancing act. If Jan loads up the roster with too many young portal pkayers, recruiting key targets in 27 and 28 classes could become an issue.
 

Jonesy5960

Heisman
Feb 1, 2023
5,955
12,254
113
I will be surprised if Journey is not playing the 3 this next season.
At this point, based upon existing personnel, I'd be surprised if she were playing the 3. It's as much about other personnel as it is about Journey. There are 3 players on the roster right now that could play the 3 in Stremlow, Whiting, and Faison. The only true 4 looks to be a freshman who hasn't yet played a college game. To the best of my knowledge, Journey is the only player on the roster today who has shown that she can compete against high level competition at that position.
 

Scott559

Heisman
Mar 16, 2010
3,167
10,440
113
At this point, based upon existing personnel, I'd be surprised if she were playing the 3. It's as much about other personnel as it is about Journey. There are 3 players on the roster right now that could play the 3 in Stremlow, Whiting, and Faison. The only true 4 looks to be a freshman who hasn't yet played a college game. To the best of my knowledge, Journey is the only player on the roster today who has shown that she can compete against high level competition at that position.
Going with the 4 out offense the 4 will likely be more in the Kate Martin version of the 4 vs the Hannah version of the 4.
 

iThinkiWill

Junior
Jul 17, 2025
178
336
63
Yeah. Journey is an excellent rebounder as well. Stating that Iowa will be a dreadful rebounding team at this point is based on nothing factual.
“[absolutely] dreadful” was the claim. As to what exactly distinguishes/constitutes ‘absolutely’ vs ‘relatively’ dreadful is arbitrary/subjective and therefore argumentative.

Of course it is just opinion after all and I for one agree with you that Iowa will not be a dreadful [relative or absolute] rebounding team.
 
Last edited:

iThinkiWill

Junior
Jul 17, 2025
178
336
63
Going with the 4 out offense the 4 will likely be more in the Kate Martin version of the 4 vs the Hannah version of the 4.
Or Ally Disterhoft would be another good example of an undersized ‘4’ in a 4-out offense. She was really a ‘3’ playing out of position.

Using the 4-out’ offense, I think Coach J would like her forwards/wings to be interchangeable. If so, Houston, Fison and Woliczko could all switch seamlessly between the two (3 and 4) positions. In addition, Kyle wrote that Coach J was still pursuing a possible /potential “rotation Wing”. I believe that Aaliyah Roberson could fit that role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Torgeroni

mphawk

Senior
Oct 1, 2001
302
557
93
Or Ally Disterhoft would be another good example of an undersized ‘4’ in a 4-out offense. She was really a ‘3’ playing out of position.

Using the 4-out’ offense, I think Coach J would like her forwards/wings to be interchangeable. If so, Houston, Fison and Woliczko could all switch seamlessly between the two (3 and 4) positions. In addition, Kyle wrote that Coach J was still pursuing a possible /potential “rotation Wing”. I believe that Aaliyah Roberson could fit that role.
And Kelly Krei for another one. Not your prototypical PF though 6-2 but hard-nosed and athletic.
 

iThinkiWill

Junior
Jul 17, 2025
178
336
63
At this point, based upon existing personnel, I'd be surprised if she were playing the 3. It's as much about other personnel as it is about Journey. There are 3 players on the roster right now that could play the 3 in Stremlow, Whiting, and Faison. The only true 4 looks to be a freshman who hasn't yet played a college game. To the best of my knowledge, Journey is the only player on the roster today who has shown that she can compete against high level competition at that position.
Based on existing personnel, yes, Houston is the only other player on the roster today with proven experience at the 4 position and will undoubtedly play at least some time (if not a majority) at the ‘4’. But that role is a lot different in the 3-out offense that Iowa used last season than the ‘4’ position in the 4-out offense that they have said they will use this next season.

Based on the current roster (which as I have said that I believe will be added to) I believe Woliczko is the most likely candidate to start at the ‘4’.
 

Burghawk87

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2023
758
1,365
93
I'm more concerned about post defense than offense. When Ava picks up the cheap fouls that ncaa women's officials are known to call, will Layla be ready to jump in for half a quarter? Last year Hannah just shuffled over to the 5 and bodied people out. Idk if Journey has that in her.
 

hawkbr

Senior
Jul 14, 2024
385
915
93
I'm more concerned about post defense than offense. When Ava picks up the cheap fouls that ncaa women's officials are known to call, will Layla be ready to jump in for half a quarter? Last year Hannah just shuffled over to the 5 and bodied people out. Idk if Journey has that in her.
Journey Houston is very strong, but she's 5-11, Hannah is 6-2. It would be a bit safer to sign another 6-3/6-4 big who could play PF/C in case Hays doesn't improve or McKenna doesn't have an immediate impact, however I think there's a good chance both of those things will happen [McKenna having an immediate impact and Hays improving and becoming a more physical and solid center]. And it would also be very important for Iowa if Heiden learned to better manage her foul trouble so she could play more than the 25 mpg last season [when necessary].
 

HawksGoneWild1

Sophomore
Sep 25, 2024
64
102
33
Or Ally Disterhoft would be another good example of an undersized ‘4’ in a 4-out offense. She was really a ‘3’ playing out of position.

Using the 4-out’ offense, I think Coach J would like her forwards/wings to be interchangeable. If so, Houston, Fison and Woliczko could all switch seamlessly between the two (3 and 4) positions. In addition, Kyle wrote that Coach J was still pursuing a possible /potential “rotation Wing”. I believe that Aaliyah Roberson could fit that role.

Believe Jan may have said something else in regard to this. Seems practice was stated and not rotational for the two outstanding players she's trying to bring in yet.

Jan's Interview Transcript:
"[Q:] You mentioned that you guys are trying to add two more some hopefully next week. what what are the pieces that you're still looking for?
[A:] You know, we don't have a true just point guard, you know, just someone in practice that you can just sometimes that just understands a point guard role, right? Um Danny and Taylor Stremlow and Chit-Chat can handle that.

But in practice for a whole season, you just need a few more bodies in there. So, I'm hoping maybe a point guard and then a wing of any sort.

Um it's hard. I know a lot of a lot of people want us to get uh bigs. We got 6'4 and 6'5 with Layla and Ava. And we have McKenna Woliczko coming in at about a 61 6'2. Uh but those those positions size that can play the perimeter and and play with their back to the basket. They're they're harder to get with that depth. They want to play a lot. So, it's plugging in the right people. But if we could get a a longer guard and a point guard, I think I'd be great with that."



I also stated in another post regarding Roberson that she will command more $$$ and PT according to her stats and her agents will make sure she gets her fair share for it. Her PER is almost 20. Meaning PT = more $$$. We seemed to have hit a soft wall on the amt of NIL we have remaining.

Also, suspect it's not going to be easy to fill the last two spots for this exact reason. Rotational mins = more $$$. Thus, practice players are what we can expect for the NIL remaining. Which to me, it means they're going to get more of Teagan Mallegni mins and not Layla Hays mins for the remaining two spots Jan talked about.

Roberson is going to be looking to move up the food chain as she got ~900 mins her SO yr and dropped to ~500 mins last yr. With her recent shooting %s and PER, no way I see her taking practice $$$.

I'd like to be wrong about rotational vs practice players but that's what I'm understanding Jan to say. Hopefully I get surprised on this but I'm not expecting much bench production to come from any remaining adds when Jan is talking practice bodies for the whole season.
 

Jonesy5960

Heisman
Feb 1, 2023
5,955
12,254
113
Believe Jan may have said something else in regard to this. Seems practice was stated and not rotational for the two outstanding players she's trying to bring in yet.

Jan's Interview Transcript:
"[Q:] You mentioned that you guys are trying to add two more some hopefully next week. what what are the pieces that you're still looking for?
[A:] You know, we don't have a true just point guard, you know, just someone in practice that you can just sometimes that just understands a point guard role, right? Um Danny and Taylor Stremlow and Chit-Chat can handle that.

But in practice for a whole season, you just need a few more bodies in there. So, I'm hoping maybe a point guard and then a wing of any sort.

Um it's hard. I know a lot of a lot of people want us to get uh bigs. We got 6'4 and 6'5 with Layla and Ava. And we have McKenna Woliczko coming in at about a 61 6'2. Uh but those those positions size that can play the perimeter and and play with their back to the basket. They're they're harder to get with that depth. They want to play a lot. So, it's plugging in the right people. But if we could get a a longer guard and a point guard, I think I'd be great with that."



I also stated in another post regarding Roberson that she will command more $$$ and PT according to her stats and her agents will make sure she gets her fair share for it. Her PER is almost 20. Meaning PT = more $$$. We seemed to have hit a soft wall on the amt of NIL we have remaining.

Also, suspect it's not going to be easy to fill the last two spots for this exact reason. Rotational mins = more $$$. Thus, practice players are what we can expect for the NIL remaining. Which to me, it means they're going to get more of Teagan Mallegni mins and not Layla Hays mins for the remaining two spots Jan talked about.

Roberson is going to be looking to move up the food chain as she got ~900 mins her SO yr and dropped to ~500 mins last yr. With her recent shooting %s and PER, no way I see her taking practice $$$.

I'd like to be wrong about rotational vs practice players but that's what I'm understanding Jan to say. Hopefully I get surprised on this but I'm not expecting much bench production to come from any remaining adds when Jan is talking practice bodies for the whole season.

I agree with this. It would be great to bring in a PF as an insurance policy, but all of the rotational players are probably in place today.
 

iThinkiWill

Junior
Jul 17, 2025
178
336
63
Believe Jan may have said something else in regard to this. Seems practice was stated and not rotational for the two outstanding players she's trying to bring in yet.

Jan's Interview Transcript:
"[Q:] You mentioned that you guys are trying to add two more some hopefully next week. what what are the pieces that you're still looking for?
[A:] You know, we don't have a true just point guard, you know, just someone in practice that you can just sometimes that just understands a point guard role, right? Um Danny and Taylor Stremlow and Chit-Chat can handle that.

But in practice for a whole season, you just need a few more bodies in there. So, I'm hoping maybe a point guard and then a wing of any sort.

Um it's hard. I know a lot of a lot of people want us to get uh bigs. We got 6'4 and 6'5 with Layla and Ava. And we have McKenna Woliczko coming in at about a 61 6'2. Uh but those those positions size that can play the perimeter and and play with their back to the basket. They're they're harder to get with that depth. They want to play a lot. So, it's plugging in the right people. But if we could get a a longer guard and a point guard, I think I'd be great with that."



I also stated in another post regarding Roberson that she will command more $$$ and PT according to her stats and her agents will make sure she gets her fair share for it. Her PER is almost 20. Meaning PT = more $$$. We seemed to have hit a soft wall on the amt of NIL we have remaining.

Also, suspect it's not going to be easy to fill the last two spots for this exact reason. Rotational mins = more $$$. Thus, practice players are what we can expect for the NIL remaining. Which to me, it means they're going to get more of Teagan Mallegni mins and not Layla Hays mins for the remaining two spots Jan talked about.

Roberson is going to be looking to move up the food chain as she got ~900 mins her SO yr and dropped to ~500 mins last yr. With her recent shooting %s and PER, no way I see her taking practice $$$.

I'd like to be wrong about rotational vs practice players but that's what I'm understanding Jan to say. Hopefully I get surprised on this but I'm not expecting much bench production to come from any remaining adds when Jan is talking practice bodies for the whole season.

I was referring to something Kyle reported about a possible/potential ‘rotational wing’. I think Roberson fits that description. In her most recent season (2024-25), prior to her injury, her role was reduced by half to less than 14 mpg. Yet I think there is upside potential. Don’t you think Iowa could use someone like this?

Also consider, she is a grad transfer/one-and-done and has the academic credentials to be admitted/accepted to graduate school. This is likely to add to her demand/value. How much $$$ do you think she will earn? How many schools can even consider paying her those $$$. What is the chance she chooses Iowa?
 

NORTHSTAR

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2001
17,461
1,223
113
Journey was a guard in high school and I recall Jan saying something after the season that Journey would be a 3 but she needed to improve ball handling.
 

o_jedn

All-Conference
Iowa Swarm member
Jan 1, 2023
587
1,530
93
Could be wrong but a poster familiar with Journey and the North High team said she played the post position at North high school.
 

o_AMAYS

All-Conference
Jan 4, 2023
686
1,255
93
Journey was a guard in high school and I recall Jan saying something after the season that Journey would be a 3 but she needed to improve ball handling.
By the latter stages of high school she was transitioning to the guard court. But her background before that was as a post. Hence the need for continued development of her guard skills.
 

NORTHSTAR

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2001
17,461
1,223
113
Journey probably did play some post because of her size in HS, and team needs, but she mostly played guard and was recruited as one.
 

HawksGoneWild1

Sophomore
Sep 25, 2024
64
102
33
I was referring to something Kyle reported about a possible/potential ‘rotational wing’. I think Roberson fits that description. In her most recent season (2024-25), prior to her injury, her role was reduced by half to less than 14 mpg. Yet I think there is upside potential. Don’t you think Iowa could use someone like this?

Also consider, she is a grad transfer/one-and-done and has the academic credentials to be admitted/accepted to graduate school. This is likely to add to her demand/value. How much $$$ do you think she will earn? How many schools can even consider paying her those $$$. What is the chance she chooses Iowa?
1st) My reply was based on the most important fact that I think Jan wins here and not what Kyle reported a few days ago (could be shorter). You responded with Kyle's report after Jan's interview was already reported on this thread. That's exactly why I responded to your later post because at that time Kyle's report is overridden with Jan's latest interview response. Didn't want people to think Kyle's rotational report was the latest and greatest plan yet. Don't get me wrong. Kyle was probably right when he posted here but Jan probably realized recently she exhausted all her rotational options coz NIL only affords us end of bench now.

2nd) What I want and what NIL remains are two separate issues. I was shocked when Jan dropped down from DC to AW (figured there would be at a minimum another coming in between DC and AW) and even more shocked when Jan dropped down again from AW to JF.

My prior post regarding this was we needed two ~5 stars/McDAAs from the portal (recover one for Deal). DC qualifies as one of them (for me as she was a McDAA nominee but not selected to play in it in 2024) but AW doesn't come close to my 2nd one. McW would of made 3 of them. 3 is usually the minimum needed to make to the E8. Having a CC22 you can get away with one but for just normal teams without a generational talent, 3 is usually the min for E8. The further you go deeper into the Big Dance (MM) the more McDAAs are needed. The last 10 D1 women's winners avg ~6.1 McDAAs.

So if things go as normal trends, the odds of making a F4 run in the Heiden era do not favor it unless she gets a fifth yr and we find more NIL for more McDAAs along the way. Your 5 Star/McDAAs give a good indication of how far you should go in MM.

McDonald's All-American Game 2024: Breaking down the East, West girls basketball rosters
 
Last edited:

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
982
1,796
93
At this point, based upon existing personnel, I'd be surprised if she were playing the 3. It's as much about other personnel as it is about Journey. There are 3 players on the roster right now that could play the 3 in Stremlow, Whiting, and Faison. The only true 4 looks to be a freshman who hasn't yet played a college game. To the best of my knowledge, Journey is the only player on the roster today who has shown that she can compete against high level competition at that position.
Hey I know you’re Taylor’s dad and the prospect of Journey starting at the 3 means TS isn’t starting, but Journey is a legit option at the 3. More size. Should be a great competition!
 

iThinkiWill

Junior
Jul 17, 2025
178
336
63
Hey I know you’re Taylor’s dad and the prospect of Journey starting at the 3 means TS isn’t starting, but Journey is a legit option at the 3. More size. Should be a great competition!
I have a lot of faith in Journey making the transition to a more perimeter oriented role. It probably won’t matter much whether she plays the 3 or 4, (it is entirely possible that she could switch between both depending on the lineup) the roles are much more similar in 4-out than 3-out.

I believe Faison could eventually also switch between the two positions. Either Stremlow, Whiting or both are good candidates for the 3. So I think this team will have a lot of versatility and good competition at the traditional forward positions.

Finally, how do you know that Jonesy is Stremlow’s father? I think that is speculative and hard to believe.
 

IowaCityLit

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2025
982
1,796
93
I have a lot of faith in Journey making the transition to a more perimeter oriented role. It probably won’t matter much whether she plays the 3 or 4, (it is entirely possible that she could switch between both depending on the lineup) the roles are much more similar in 4-out than 3-out.

I believe Faison could eventually also switch between the two positions. Either Stremlow, Whiting or both are good candidates for the 3. So I think this team will have a lot of versatility and good competition at the traditional forward positions.

Finally, how do you know that Jonesy is Stremlow’s father? I think that is speculative and hard to believe.
The evidence is in his previous posts. The odd fixation with TS more than the rest of the team. The disparaging comments of other players.,But regardless, I think you’re right. I think the versatility is critical.
 

hawkbr

Senior
Jul 14, 2024
385
915
93
1st) My reply was based on the most important fact that I think Jan wins here and not what Kyle reported a few days ago (could be shorter). You responded with Kyle's report after Jan's interview was already reported on this thread. That's exactly why I responded to your later post because at that time Kyle's report is overridden with Jan's latest interview response. Didn't want people to think Kyle's rotational report was the latest and greatest plan yet. Don't get me wrong. Kyle was probably right when he posted here but Jan probably realized recently she exhausted all her rotational options coz NIL only affords us end of bench now.

2nd) What I want and what NIL remains are two separate issues. I was shocked when Jan dropped down from DC to AW (figured there would be at a minimum another coming is between DC and AW) and even more shocked when Jan dropped down from AW to JF.

My prior post regarding this was we needed two ~5 stars/McDAAs (recover one for Deal). DC qualifies as one of them (for me as she was a McDAA nominee but not selected to play in it in 2024) but AW doesn't come close to my 2nd one. McW would of made 3 of them. 3 is usually the minimum needed to make to the E8. Having a CC22 you can get away with one but for just normal teams without a generational talent, 3 is usually the min for E8. The further you go deeper into the Big Dance (MM) the more McDAAs are needed. The last 10 D1 women's winners avg ~6.1 McDAAs.

So if things go as normal trends, the odds of making a F4 run in the Heiden era do not favor it unless she gets a fifth yr and we find more NIL for more McDAAs along the way. Your 5 Star/McDAAs give a good indication of how far you should go in MM.

McDonald's All-American Game 2024: Breaking down the East, West girls basketball rosters
I understand your point, i also wish Iowa had as many elite players as possible, but I think 5-stars /McDAAs status is important to a certain extent, it's not an absolute truth. In the 2024 class, Ava Heiden was ranked 4 stars and #42, but she's much better than Kate Koval (#5). Chit Chat (#49) is certainly better than 5-star Avary Cain (#26) and perhaps even better than Kayleigh Heckel (#13) and the 4-star Dani Carnegie (#29) is much better than 5-star Avery Howell (#14) and Imari Berry (#19). If the 2024 class were reranked based on how each player plays today, Iowa would have four 5-star players. And I think that matters more than HS ranking status: the level that each player has today.
 
Last edited:

Zach Jump

All-Conference
Jun 24, 2022
2,945
4,989
113
1st) My reply was based on the most important fact that I think Jan wins here and not what Kyle reported a few days ago (could be shorter). You responded with Kyle's report after Jan's interview was already reported on this thread. That's exactly why I responded to your later post because at that time Kyle's report is overridden with Jan's latest interview response. Didn't want people to think Kyle's rotational report was the latest and greatest plan yet. Don't get me wrong. Kyle was probably right when he posted here but Jan probably realized recently she exhausted all her rotational options coz NIL only affords us end of bench now.

2nd) What I want and what NIL remains are two separate issues. I was shocked when Jan dropped down from DC to AW (figured there would be at a minimum another coming is between DC and AW) and even more shocked when Jan dropped down from AW to JF.

My prior post regarding this was we needed two ~5 stars/McDAAs (recover one for Deal). DC qualifies as one of them (for me as she was a McDAA nominee but not selected to play in it in 2024) but AW doesn't come close to my 2nd one. McW would of made 3 of them. 3 is usually the minimum needed to make to the E8. Having a CC22 you can get away with one but for just normal teams without a generational talent, 3 is usually the min for E8. The further you go deeper into the Big Dance (MM) the more McDAAs are needed. The last 10 D1 women's winners avg ~6.1 McDAAs.

So if things go as normal trends, the odds of making a F4 run in the Heiden era do not favor it unless she gets a fifth yr and we find more NIL for more McDAAs along the way. Your 5 Star/McDAAs give a good indication of how far you should go in MM.

McDonald's All-American Game 2024: Breaking down the East, West girls basketball rosters

What is with the initials?
 

Jonesy5960

Heisman
Feb 1, 2023
5,955
12,254
113
Hey I know you’re Taylor’s dad and the prospect of Journey starting at the 3 means TS isn’t starting, but Journey is a legit option at the 3. More size. Should be a great competition!
You never tire of embarrassing yourself with your fixation on me or Stremlow do you? As I told you previously when you got weird, I couldn't care less who starts. I'm a huge fan of Journey. I'll be surprised if she starts at the 3, but I wouldn't be surprised if she splits time between the 3 and the 4.